本文選題：看守所 + 人權(quán)��； 參考：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 本文所要探討的主要問題是目前看守所工作中在在押人員合法權(quán)益保障方面存在的不足。 結(jié)合監(jiān)所工作實(shí)際,本文通過文件資料檢索、中外監(jiān)所管理比較、數(shù)據(jù)統(tǒng)計(jì)分析、問卷調(diào)查、個(gè)案訪談等方法展開研討。 論文重點(diǎn)探討以下幾個(gè)方面: 一是看守所不同性質(zhì)在押人員合法權(quán)益保障中的共性問題。例如“牢頭獄霸”的打擊防范不力,在押人員被體罰、虐待、被強(qiáng)迫參加勞動生產(chǎn),在押人員的行動權(quán)、休息權(quán)、受教育權(quán)、娛樂權(quán)受限過多等。 二是未決在押人員合法權(quán)益保障中存在的問題。按照無罪推定的原則,看守所內(nèi)羈押的犯罪嫌疑人、被告人等未判刑的對象應(yīng)被視為無罪,但是實(shí)際管理中由于這類對象思想情緒變化大,出于安全的考慮往往對這部分未決對象采取更為嚴(yán)格的管理手段,他們被長時(shí)間羈押、超期羈押,會見親屬更是不可能,對未決在押人員的這些嚴(yán)格管理措施與法律關(guān)于公民權(quán)利的規(guī)定是否相符? 三是拘役罪犯合法權(quán)益保障中存在的問題。拘役罪犯在看守所內(nèi)服刑,但是看守所所能給予的關(guān)注度和教育矯治方面所花的精力十分有限,即使在“回家探親”權(quán)被明確規(guī)定之后,不僅拘役罪犯本身,甚至監(jiān)管民警也不清楚拘役犯與徒刑犯的差別何在、拘役罪犯回家探親如何操作。 最后是筆者對完善看守所在押人員合法權(quán)益保障的思考。
[Abstract]:The main problem to be discussed in this paper is that there are some shortcomings in the protection of the legal rights and interests of the detainees at present .



Combined with the work of the monitor , this paper discusses the methods of document data retrieval , management comparison between Chinese and foreign monitors , data statistical analysis , questionnaire survey and case interview .



The thesis focuses on the following aspects :



First , it is a common problem in the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the security guards . For example , the fight against the " prison wardens " is not sufficient , and the detainees are subject to corporal punishment , ill - treatment , forced participation in labour production , the right to action of the detainees , the right to rest , the right to education and the limited right of entertainment .



Second , there are some problems in the safeguard of the legitimate rights and interests of the detainees . In the light of the principle of presumption of innocence , the non - sentenced objects such as the suspect and the defendant in custody are regarded as innocent , but because of the great change in the ideological and emotional change of such objects in the actual management , it is not possible to take longer custody , prolonged detention and meeting with relatives , and whether the strict management measures of the outstanding detainees are in conformity with the provisions of the law on civil rights ?



Third , there is a problem in the protection of the lawful rights and interests of criminal detention criminals . Although criminal detention criminals are serving their sentences within the prison , the attention paid by the guards is very limited . Even after the " home visit " right is clearly defined , not only the criminal itself but also the supervisory civilian police are not clearly aware of the difference between the criminal detention and the prison sentence , and how to operate the criminal detention offender home .



At last , the author thinks about the perfection of the safeguard of the legal rights and interests of the guards .

【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：D631.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 岑颯,王文利;我國拘役刑制度演變[J];社會科學(xué)家;2004年03期

2 趙運(yùn)恒;罪犯權(quán)利論[J];中國刑事法雜志;2001年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 呂成光;對監(jiān)獄罪犯“同居會見”的理性思考[D];山東大學(xué);2007年

2 劉明光;罪犯勞動的若干問題研究[D];山東大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：1852658