本文選題：公安機(jī)關(guān) + 群體性事件　； 參考：《上海交通大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 當(dāng)前我國(guó)正處于不斷發(fā)展的進(jìn)程中,但是群體性事件處于高發(fā)狀態(tài),成為嚴(yán)重影響社會(huì)穩(wěn)定的突出問(wèn)題。應(yīng)對(duì)、處置、治理群體性事件是黨委、政府的一項(xiàng)重要任務(wù)。然而,不少地方黨委、政府存在“輕預(yù)防、重處置,輕化解、重打擊”的錯(cuò)誤傾向,往往將公安機(jī)關(guān)作為“擋箭牌”,推到第一線。產(chǎn)生這種情況的原因是對(duì)公安機(jī)關(guān)處置群體性事件的職責(zé)定位不清,因此,深入分析研究公安機(jī)關(guān)的角色定位,并進(jìn)而提出公安機(jī)關(guān)應(yīng)對(duì)群體性事件的可行措施是十分有必要的。 作為政府部門(mén)的重要組成部分,公安機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)群體性事件的應(yīng)對(duì)處置是政府職能在公共安全領(lǐng)域的重要表現(xiàn)。對(duì)政府職能在理論層面的不同認(rèn)識(shí),導(dǎo)致了政府對(duì)社會(huì)公共事務(wù)的不同態(tài)度,這是公安機(jī)關(guān)或警察機(jī)關(guān)應(yīng)對(duì)群體性事件職能定位的邏輯起點(diǎn)。在西方國(guó)家,由于“天賦人權(quán)”思想源遠(yuǎn)流長(zhǎng),警察機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)群體性活動(dòng)較為容忍,警察職權(quán)以法律規(guī)定為限。在我國(guó),由于計(jì)劃體制的影響,政府對(duì)公安機(jī)關(guān)處置群體性事件的要求很多,甚至認(rèn)為只有警察能夠解決問(wèn)題。 公安機(jī)關(guān)的角色定位取決于三種因素:法律的規(guī)定、政府的期望以及群體性事件本身的特點(diǎn)。法律規(guī)定了公安機(jī)關(guān)可以做什么,但目前我國(guó)并沒(méi)有專門(mén)的法律規(guī)范。政府從政治層面提出公安機(jī)關(guān)需要做什么,隨著我國(guó)政府職能的轉(zhuǎn)變,公安機(jī)關(guān)必然承擔(dān)更多的職責(zé)。群體性事件是公安機(jī)關(guān)應(yīng)對(duì)處置的目標(biāo),沒(méi)有群體性事件,就沒(méi)有處置群體性事件的工作;不同性質(zhì)、特點(diǎn)的群體性事件,就要開(kāi)展不同的工作,承擔(dān)不同的角色任務(wù)。 但在實(shí)踐中,公安機(jī)關(guān)角色的運(yùn)行碰到了很多問(wèn)題。一是發(fā)生了角色沖突,如控制社會(huì)與保障權(quán)利的矛盾,剛性執(zhí)法與柔性處置的矛盾。二是角色錯(cuò)位,主要是作為維護(hù)秩序的公安機(jī)關(guān)被政府推到解決問(wèn)題的第一線。三是角色弱化,主要是情報(bào)信息搜集功能沒(méi)有貫穿群體性事件始終。四是角色缺失,在當(dāng)前形勢(shì)多變的情況下,公安機(jī)關(guān)的角色沒(méi)有得到有效的拓展和延伸。 公安機(jī)關(guān)在應(yīng)對(duì)群體性事件中,應(yīng)當(dāng)強(qiáng)化多種角色:要完善權(quán)利保護(hù)者、法律執(zhí)行者的角色;要明晰秩序維護(hù)者、輔助化解者的角色;要強(qiáng)化情報(bào)搜集評(píng)估者、政權(quán)維護(hù)者的角色,要建立網(wǎng)上管控者的角色。為此,要進(jìn)一步完善法律和行政賦權(quán),并據(jù)此采取針對(duì)的措施有效應(yīng)對(duì)群體性事件。一是建立完善覆蓋群體性事件全過(guò)程的情報(bào)信息工作機(jī)制。二是建立和完善群體性矛盾化解的聯(lián)合工作機(jī)制。三是建立完善群體性事件處置機(jī)制,及時(shí)消除群體性事件的危害。
[Abstract]:At present, China is in the process of continuous development, but mass incidents are in a high state, which has become a prominent problem seriously affecting social stability. It is an important task of the Party Committee and the government to deal with, deal with and manage mass incidents. However, many local party committees and governments have the wrong tendency of "paying little attention to prevention, handling, resolving and attacking," and often use the public security organs as a "shield" and push them to the front line. The reason for this is that the role of public security organs in dealing with mass incidents is not clearly defined. Therefore, the role of public security organs is analyzed and studied in depth. Furthermore, it is necessary to put forward feasible measures for public security organs to deal with group incidents. As an important part of government departments, the response of public security organs to mass incidents is an important manifestation of government functions in the field of public security. The different understanding of the government's function in theory leads to the different attitude of the government to the social public affairs, which is the logical starting point of the function orientation of the public security organ or the police organ to deal with the mass incident. In western countries, due to the long history of the thought of "natural human rights", the police authorities are more tolerant of group activities, and the power of the police is limited by law. In our country, due to the influence of the planning system, the government demands a lot of public security organs to deal with group incidents, and even thinks that only the police can solve the problem. The role of public security organs depends on three factors: the regulation of law, the expectations of the government and the characteristics of mass incidents. The law prescribes what the public security organs can do, but there are no special legal norms in our country. The government puts forward what the public security organs need to do from the political level. With the change of our government's functions, the public security organs are bound to assume more responsibilities. Group incident is the target of the public security organ to deal with it. Without group incident, there is no work to deal with group incident, and the group event of different nature and characteristics should carry out different work and undertake different roles and tasks. However, in practice, the role of public security organs run into a lot of problems. One is the conflict of roles, such as the contradiction between controlling society and guaranteeing rights, the contradiction between rigid law enforcement and flexible disposal. Second, role dislocation, mainly as a public security organ to maintain order by the government to solve the problem. Third, the role of weakening, mainly intelligence information collection function has not been through the group events. Fourth, the lack of role, in the current situation, the role of public security organs has not been effectively expanded and extended. In dealing with mass incidents, the public security organs should strengthen many kinds of roles: to perfect the role of the protector of rights and the executor of the law; to clarify the role of the defender of order and assist in the dissolving; and to strengthen the person who collects and assesses the information. The role of regime defenders, to establish the role of online regulators. Therefore, we should further improve the legal and administrative empowerment, and take measures to effectively deal with group incidents. The first is to establish and improve the information work mechanism covering the whole process of group events. Second, establish and perfect the joint working mechanism of resolving group contradictions. Third, establish and perfect the handling mechanism of group incidents and eliminate the harm of group incidents in time.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D631.4

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 張盛林;我國(guó)群體性事件中警察角色問(wèn)題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

2 路洪濤;公安機(jī)關(guān)處置群體性事件對(duì)策研究[D];山東大學(xué);2011年

3 陳志宏;武警部隊(duì)參與群體性事件處置研究[D];中南大學(xué);2011年

4 任浩;群體性事件處置中刑事技術(shù)依法使用研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1784446