本文選題：社區(qū)矯正 + 刑罰體系��； 參考：《甘肅政法學(xué)院》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：在行刑社會(huì)化、刑罰謙抑性、行刑經(jīng)濟(jì)性等理論深刻影響現(xiàn)代司法的背景下,人類刑罰理念又一次出現(xiàn)重大轉(zhuǎn)變,社區(qū)矯正順應(yīng)而生,成為了世界各國(guó)刑罰制度改革和發(fā)展的重要內(nèi)容,其一改傳統(tǒng)報(bào)應(yīng)主義刑罰過分強(qiáng)調(diào)懲罰性,轉(zhuǎn)而注重通過對(duì)罪犯的教育改造,促使其能更好的回歸社會(huì)。社區(qū)矯正歷經(jīng)長(zhǎng)期發(fā)展,漸已成熟。較之域外而言,我國(guó)的社區(qū)矯正起步較晚,自試點(diǎn)至全面施行以來,成績(jī)雖已鑄就且較為矚目,但其發(fā)展諸多方面仍亟待完善。2013年勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度在我國(guó)走向末路的同時(shí),法學(xué)理論界、實(shí)務(wù)界亦展開了社區(qū)矯正制度完備化、法制化的討論。社區(qū)矯正這種注重人權(quán)人的輕刑化處遇模式,作為我國(guó)刑事司法制度改革的一部分已被我國(guó)刑事法律條文明文規(guī)定。本文從社區(qū)矯正的基本問題為研究的切入方向,通過對(duì)其理論及其在域外國(guó)家的運(yùn)行現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行闡釋,運(yùn)用比較研究之方法,對(duì)我國(guó)存在的相關(guān)問題進(jìn)行剖析,同時(shí)總結(jié)反思社區(qū)矯正實(shí)踐困境,試從理念、立法、司法實(shí)踐等方面提出完善我國(guó)社區(qū)矯正、盡快使之形成完整制度的建議,以推動(dòng)建立符合我國(guó)實(shí)際情形的、切實(shí)可行的非監(jiān)禁刑體系。內(nèi)容上,本文在對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外司法實(shí)踐進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析的基礎(chǔ)上,發(fā)掘我國(guó)社區(qū)矯正不足之處,與此同時(shí)有針對(duì)性地提出改善建議,總體分為五個(gè)部分:首先,對(duì)課題的背景做出闡述,進(jìn)而介紹課題研究重點(diǎn)及方法、思路。其次,對(duì)于社會(huì)矯正的相關(guān)概念、性質(zhì)、特點(diǎn)、理論基礎(chǔ)等進(jìn)行厘清、闡釋,為進(jìn)一步研究課題提供理論支撐;再次,集中對(duì)域外國(guó)家社會(huì)矯正的司法實(shí)踐現(xiàn)狀、特點(diǎn)進(jìn)行闡釋,通過對(duì)之介紹、分析并此基礎(chǔ)上比照總結(jié)不同國(guó)家之異同,尋找發(fā)展我國(guó)社區(qū)矯正的實(shí)踐進(jìn)路;第四,對(duì)我國(guó)社區(qū)矯正現(xiàn)狀的法律、實(shí)踐兩個(gè)方面進(jìn)行分析、概括,當(dāng)前的諸多缺陷主要表現(xiàn)在其制度設(shè)計(jì)和司法實(shí)踐的雙重不足;最后,針對(duì)性地就如何進(jìn)一步發(fā)展我國(guó)社區(qū)矯正提出具體建議。2016年12月1日國(guó)務(wù)院法制工作辦公室正式向社會(huì)征集《中華人民共和國(guó)社區(qū)矯正法(征求意見稿)》意見,《社區(qū)矯正法》已經(jīng)列入國(guó)家立法審議序列,因此還需進(jìn)行前瞻性的思考與探索,考量相關(guān)刑罰制度與社區(qū)矯正的對(duì)接對(duì)我國(guó)刑罰體系改革進(jìn)路之影響,同時(shí)在司法實(shí)踐中克服執(zhí)行主體缺陷、相關(guān)機(jī)構(gòu)職能協(xié)作、拓展完善社會(huì)力量建設(shè)與參與機(jī)制等層面對(duì)我國(guó)社區(qū)矯正之完善提供對(duì)策。
[Abstract]:Under the background that the socialization of execution, the modesty of punishment and the economy of execution deeply influence the modern justice, the concept of human penalty has once again undergone a major change, and the community correction has complied with it. It has become an important content of the reform and development of the penalty system in various countries in the world. It has changed the traditional retribution doctrine and put too much emphasis on punitive punishment, instead, it has paid more attention to the reform of the criminals' education so as to urge them to return to the society better. After long-term development, community correction has gradually matured. Compared with the foreign countries, the community correction in our country started relatively late. Although the achievements have been cast and paid close attention to since the trial stage to the full implementation, many aspects of its development still need to be improved. At the same time, the system of reeducation through labor in 2013 is on the way to the end of our country. The discussion of the perfection and legalization of community correction system has also been carried out in the field of law theory and practice. As a part of the reform of criminal justice system, community correction, which pays attention to the light punishment of human rights people, has been explicitly stipulated in the criminal law provisions of our country. In this paper, the basic problems of community correction are considered as the research direction, through the explanation of its theory and its operation status in foreign countries, and the comparative study method, the paper analyzes the related problems existing in our country. At the same time, it sums up and reflects on the dilemma of community correction practice, tries to put forward some suggestions on perfecting the community correction in our country from the aspects of concept, legislation, judicial practice, and makes it form a complete system as soon as possible, in order to promote the establishment of the community correction in accordance with the actual situation of our A viable system of non-custodial penalties On the content, on the basis of comparative analysis of domestic and foreign judicial practice, this paper explores the deficiencies of community correction in our country, and at the same time, puts forward some suggestions for improvement, which is divided into five parts: first, This paper expounds the background of the subject, and then introduces the research emphases, methods and train of thought. Secondly, the related concepts, properties, characteristics, theoretical basis of social correction are clarified and explained, which provide theoretical support for further research. Thirdly, focus on the status quo of judicial practice of social correction in foreign countries. On the basis of introducing, analyzing and summarizing the similarities and differences of different countries, the author tries to find a way to develop the practice of community correction in our country; fourth, to analyze the law and practice of the present situation of community correction in our country. To sum up, many current defects are mainly manifested in the dual deficiency of its system design and judicial practice; finally, On December 1, 2016, the legal Affairs Office of the State Council formally solicited the opinions of the Law of the people's Republic of China on Community Correction (draft for opinions), < The Community Corrections Act has been included in the list of national legislative reviews, Therefore, it is also necessary to carry out forward-looking thinking and exploration, to consider the impact of the docking of the relevant penalty system and community correction on the reform of the penal system in China, and to overcome the defects of the executive body in the judicial practice and to coordinate the functions of the relevant institutions. Expand and perfect the social force construction and participation mechanism and provide countermeasures for the improvement of community correction in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：甘肅政法學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D926.8

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王利榮;;我國(guó)刑罰體系結(jié)構(gòu)再協(xié)調(diào)問題之思考——以《中華人民共和國(guó)刑法修正案(八)》為分析樣本[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2011年13期

2 王利榮;;我國(guó)刑罰體系結(jié)構(gòu)再協(xié)調(diào)問題之思考——以《中華人民共和國(guó)刑法修正案(八)》為分析樣本[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2011年15期

3 徐岱;中國(guó)刑名及刑罰體系近代化論綱[J];吉林大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2001年06期

4 譚光定;變革、完善我國(guó)刑罰體系的思考[J];探索;2002年02期

5 張敏;;關(guān)于我國(guó)刑罰體系若干問題之思考[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)理人;2006年09期

6 岳志堅(jiān);;論我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段刑罰體系存在的問題及完善[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年12期

7 陳鴻;;我國(guó)現(xiàn)行刑罰體系非和諧因素分析[J];中共銀川市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

8 張蓉;;論職務(wù)犯罪刑罰體系的調(diào)整——刑事政策視角下之比較研究[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2008年09期

9 洪偉;;論我國(guó)未成年人刑罰體系之完善[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年12期

10 黃曉亮;徐盛軍;;中國(guó)現(xiàn)行刑罰體系的理論反思[J];刑法論叢;2009年03期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 王中侃;;論我國(guó)刑罰體系和刑種的完善[A];論中國(guó)式的社會(huì)主義現(xiàn)代化[C];2002年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前5條

1 薛暢宇;現(xiàn)代刑罰：離不開人文關(guān)懷和倫理價(jià)值[N];長(zhǎng)春日?qǐng)?bào);2005年

2 江蘇省高級(jí)人民法院 倪祥武;完善我國(guó)刑罰體系的思考[N];人民法院報(bào);2007年

3 王俊杰;重構(gòu)刑罰體系是取消死刑的前提[N];民主與法制時(shí)報(bào);2008年

4 趙曉耕 史永麗;中國(guó)歷史上肉刑的存廢之爭(zhēng)[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2004年

5 王威;建議強(qiáng)化死緩的威懾功能[N];民主與法制時(shí)報(bào);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 岳志堅(jiān);論我國(guó)刑罰體系的完善[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2009年

2 陳麗霞;略論秦及漢初刑罰體系[D];蘭州大學(xué);2015年

3 吳敵;我國(guó)企業(yè)刑事責(zé)任實(shí)現(xiàn)路徑的探究[D];吉林財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2017年

4 武少安;我國(guó)社區(qū)矯正現(xiàn)狀、問題及其完善[D];甘肅政法學(xué)院;2017年

5 孫嘉偉;論新時(shí)代我國(guó)刑罰體系存在的問題及改革[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2008年

6 宋永輝;我國(guó)刑罰體系若干問題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年

7 蒲正春;論我國(guó)刑罰體系的缺陷及補(bǔ)正[D];西南政法大學(xué);2006年

8 邵建榮;適用于犯罪單位的刑罰體系構(gòu)想[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2001年

9 劉玉濤;我國(guó)現(xiàn)行死刑政策對(duì)我國(guó)刑罰體系結(jié)構(gòu)構(gòu)建的影響[D];蘭州大學(xué);2007年

10 相華生;貪污受賄罪的刑罰適用與我國(guó)刑罰體系的完善[D];蘇州大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1777580