本文選題：私人偵探 + 私家偵探��； 參考：《湖南大學》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 私人偵探在西方社會是發(fā)展成熟的服務類型行業(yè),因?qū)I(yè)化分工精細,從業(yè)人員素質(zhì)高而受人尊崇,其社會地位不亞于醫(yī)生與律師,是一種高風險和高利潤回報的職業(yè)。而在我國來講,私人偵探業(yè)尚屬于新生事物,雖然在民國時期業(yè)已出現(xiàn),但由于它的社會基礎和經(jīng)濟基礎都不是很成熟,加之人們的思想相對保守,以及社會糾紛和矛盾也少等種種原因,行業(yè)活動很快就陷入沉寂,直到上個世紀90年代中后期才得到長足的發(fā)展。可以說,自從行業(yè)開始出現(xiàn)至今,關于私人偵探業(yè)的存廢一直是學術界討論的焦點,一方面是私人偵探業(yè)無序發(fā)展和監(jiān)控缺失,造成了一系列的社會負面效應,國家機關因此采取了相應的審慎的處理態(tài)度,出臺了相關的禁令,進行了取締；而從另一方面來看,則是在巨大的市場需求和高額的利潤刺激下,私人偵探機構逐漸轉(zhuǎn)入了半地下的經(jīng)營。隨著社會包容力的日漸提高,人們也越來越能夠理解和支持這個行業(yè)的發(fā)展,這樣就造成了中國的私人偵探隊伍在無序中蓬勃發(fā)展壯大的一種混亂狀態(tài)。 在我國,私人偵探們的未來的將何去何從,取決于我們將采取何種態(tài)度去對待私人偵探。是因噎廢食、予以封殺還是正視現(xiàn)實、強化管理,是默示其半地下的生存狀態(tài)還是用給予其明確的合法地位,是重視打擊其帶來危害還是應該從源頭上堵截其產(chǎn)生負面效應的根源。毫無疑問,后者應當是科學的選擇,也是符合理性且思辨精神的。 正視現(xiàn)實、立足長遠、著眼未來,私人偵探的存在到底應不應該得到國家的認可,國家制定的法律又應當如何去更好的引導私人偵探業(yè)的發(fā)展,將其納入到我們社會主義法制建設的軌道上來,讓私人偵探業(yè)盡快走上理性而又有序的發(fā)展之路,這些問題值得學界認真的思考。
[Abstract]:Private detective is a mature service industry in western society. It is respected because of its fine specialization and high quality. Its social status is no less than that of doctors and lawyers. It is a profession of high risk and high profit return.In our country, the private detective industry is still a new thing. Although it appeared in the Republic of China, its social foundation and economic foundation are not very mature, and people's thoughts are relatively conservative.As well as social disputes and contradictions and other reasons, the industry quickly fell into silence, until the late 1990s to get considerable development.It can be said that since the emergence of the industry, the existence and abolition of the private detective industry has always been the focus of academic discussion. On the one hand, the disorderly development and lack of monitoring of the private detective industry have resulted in a series of negative social effects.As a result, the state organs adopted a corresponding prudent approach, issued a related ban and banned it; on the other hand, it was stimulated by huge market demand and high profits.Private detective agencies are gradually moving into semi-underground operations.With the increasing social tolerance, people are more and more able to understand and support the development of the industry, which has created a chaotic situation in which China's private detectives flourish in disorder.In our country, the future of private detectives depends on how we treat them.Is it to waste food because of choking, to block it or to face up to reality, to strengthen management, to imply its semi-underground living state or to give it a clear legal status,Whether to pay attention to the harm caused by it or to intercept the root causes of its negative effects at the source.There is no doubt that the latter should be scientific, rational and speculative.Facing up to reality, standing in the long run, looking to the future, whether the existence of private detectives should be recognized by the state or not, and how the laws formulated by the state should better guide the development of the private detective industry,Bring it into the track of our socialist legal system construction, let the private detective industry take the rational and orderly development road as soon as possible, these problems are worthy of serious consideration by the academic circles.
【學位授予單位】：湖南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D631.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 謝振輝;私人偵探業(yè)在中國的可行性[J];法學;1999年12期

2 賀紅梅;;論我國私人偵探制度的構建[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(下旬刊);2009年07期

3 王向君;;論私人偵探介入刑事訴訟的積極意義[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(下旬刊);2009年09期

4 呂緒濱;;明確地位 積極引導 促進中國私家偵探業(yè)的規(guī)范發(fā)展[J];法制與社會;2009年07期

5 黃琳;;論私家偵探的法律地位[J];法制與社會;2009年20期

6 麻愛琴;;對私家偵探相關問題的思考[J];法制與社會;2009年21期

7 孫海波,王連清;試論私人偵探在我國的可行性問題[J];公安研究;2004年10期

8 韓佩嬈;;論民事訴訟中私人偵探證據(jù)合法性[J];經(jīng)營管理者;2009年12期

9 張步文;刑事偵查權涵義多樣性初探[J];河北法學;2004年11期

10 付鳳鳴;夏烈軍;;對我國私人偵探業(yè)現(xiàn)狀的思考——從黃立榮被害案說起[J];湖北警官學院學報;2009年01期

，

本文編號：1739303