本文選題：犯罪心理測試　切入點：測謊　出處：《燕山大學》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 犯罪心理測試技術(shù)是一項新興的先進司法應(yīng)用技術(shù)。此項技術(shù)主要運用心理學與生理學中的“刺激——反應(yīng)”原理,通過檢測被測人有無涉案的犯罪心理痕跡,達到區(qū)分作案者與無辜者的目的。傳統(tǒng)的“測謊”假說并不科學。目前,犯罪心理測試技術(shù)主要運用于我國刑事司法領(lǐng)域,尤其在偵查階段發(fā)揮著重要作用。盡管此項技術(shù)具有一定的局限性,但其原理的科學性與結(jié)論的可靠性已得到實踐的證實。 在肯定犯罪心理測試技術(shù)價值的基礎(chǔ)上,進一步分析測試結(jié)論的證據(jù)屬性問題。犯罪心理測試結(jié)論具有證據(jù)資格,本質(zhì)上應(yīng)當屬于“鑒定結(jié)論”的范疇。就其證明力而言,犯罪心理測試結(jié)論不僅可以用來審查判斷其他證據(jù)的真實性,它同樣可以作為認定案件事實的依據(jù)。特別是當測試結(jié)論認定被測人是無辜者時,法院據(jù)此可以做出宣告被告人無罪的判決。但在認定被告人有罪方面,還需與其他證據(jù)結(jié)合起來共同認定案件事實。 由于現(xiàn)行法律的模糊與行業(yè)標準的欠缺,導致犯罪心理測試技術(shù)在司法實踐運用中出現(xiàn)混亂,此外,從犯罪心理測試主體、測試儀器、測試環(huán)境、測試程序等方面都處于一種無序狀態(tài)。針對這些問題,應(yīng)當從立法完善與技術(shù)操作角度加以規(guī)范。諸如需要立法明確犯罪心理測試結(jié)論的證據(jù)屬性,賦予測試人員與鑒定人同等的法律地位,加強測試技術(shù)行業(yè)管理等方面,從而促進此項技術(shù)早日得到規(guī)范化應(yīng)用與健康發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:Criminal psychology testing technology is a new advanced judicial application technology.This technique mainly uses the principle of "stimulus-response" in psychology and physiology to distinguish between the perpetrator and the innocent by detecting whether the person involved in the crime has criminal psychological trace or not.The traditional lie detector hypothesis is not scientific.At present, the criminal psychology test technology is mainly used in the field of criminal justice in China, especially in the phase of investigation plays an important role.Although this technique has some limitations, the scientific nature of its principle and the reliability of its conclusion have been proved by practice.On the basis of affirming the technical value of criminal psychological test, this paper further analyzes the evidence attribute of the test conclusion.The conclusion of criminal psychological test has the qualification of evidence and should belong to the category of "appraisal conclusion" in essence.As far as its proof is concerned, the conclusion of criminal psychological test can not only be used to examine and judge the authenticity of other evidence, but also as the basis for determining the facts of the case.Especially when the test concludes that the subject is innocent, the court can acquit the defendant accordingly.But in the aspect of finding the defendant guilty, it is necessary to combine with other evidence to identify the facts of the case.Due to the ambiguity of the current law and the lack of industry standards, there is confusion in the application of criminal psychology testing technology in judicial practice. In addition, from the subject of criminal psychology test, the test instrument, the test environment,Testing procedures and other aspects are in a state of disorder.In view of these problems, we should standardize them from the angle of legislative perfection and technical operation.For example, it is necessary to legislate to clarify the evidence attribute of the conclusion of criminal psychological test, to endow the testers with the same legal status as the connoisseur, to strengthen the management of the testing technology and so on, so as to promote the standardized application and healthy development of this technology as soon as possible.
【學位授予單位】：燕山大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D917

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 胡玉霞;盧小毛;;對證據(jù)制度與證明標準關(guān)系的反思——兼論證據(jù)制度的標志[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2006年01期

2 宗會霞;;論測謊結(jié)果的證據(jù)效力[J];太原城市職業(yè)技術(shù)學院學報;2006年05期

3 武伯欣;張澤民;;“測謊”結(jié)論能否作為鑒定證據(jù)——關(guān)于中國心理測試技術(shù)研究應(yīng)用及其現(xiàn)狀的思考[J];證據(jù)科學;2008年05期

4 宋英輝;關(guān)于測謊證據(jù)有關(guān)問題的探討[J];法商研究(中南政法學院學報);1999年05期

5 張澤濤;美國測謊制度的發(fā)展過程對我國的啟示[J];法商研究;2003年06期

6 蔣石平;;測謊技術(shù)法律問題透析[J];法學評論;2006年01期

7 劉洪廣;;對公安機關(guān)心理測試未來發(fā)展的思考[J];中國人民公安大學學報(社會科學版);2006年02期

8 陶楊;犯罪心理測試程序規(guī)范化研究——刑事訴訟的角度[J];河北公安警察職業(yè)學院學報;2005年01期

9 潘守信;;犯罪心理痕跡分析步驟和方法[J];江蘇警官學院學報;2007年04期

10 武伯欣;;中國犯罪心理學測試技術(shù)應(yīng)用理論[J];中國公共安全(學術(shù)卷);2005年01期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 本報特約記者 蘇麗敬;[N];北京科技報;2007年

，

本文編號：1720618