【摘要】：復(fù)仇起源于原始時(shí)期,在法律產(chǎn)生之后,法律對(duì)于復(fù)仇基本上是以禁止為主,但是也有一定的寬容性。在中國古代,很多思想家都對(duì)復(fù)仇行為提出了自己的見解,中國古代復(fù)仇思想也從單純地由討論具體復(fù)仇個(gè)案的處理結(jié)果發(fā)展到對(duì)于復(fù)仇案件處理程序的設(shè)計(jì)。中國古代復(fù)仇思想可以說是禮法結(jié)合的一個(gè)縮影,在禮法結(jié)合的過程中,中國古代復(fù)仇思想由于受到儒家思想的影響較大,很難從根本上反對(duì)復(fù)仇行為。儒家思想通過復(fù)仇思想對(duì)于復(fù)仇案件和有關(guān)復(fù)仇的法律規(guī)定都產(chǎn)生了一定的影響,復(fù)仇案件的數(shù)量隨著禮法之間的不斷調(diào)整而變化,但是復(fù)仇現(xiàn)象始終沒有消失。 本文主要從下面四個(gè)章節(jié)進(jìn)行論述：第一章主要介紹復(fù)仇的概念,這一章主要是對(duì)復(fù)仇相關(guān)概念和起源的界定。第二章主要介紹中國古代復(fù)仇思想史,分為漢朝之前、漢朝至唐朝、唐朝和唐朝以后時(shí)期四個(gè)時(shí)間段進(jìn)行介紹。第三章分析了儒家思想對(duì)復(fù)仇思想的影響,主要分析了儒家重禮輕法思想、“孝”的思想、“德主刑輔”和“原心定罪”思想原則對(duì)于復(fù)仇法律思想的影響。第四章分析了復(fù)仇法律思想產(chǎn)生的影響,是從復(fù)仇思想對(duì)立法和司法的影響、對(duì)主流價(jià)值觀的影響、對(duì)復(fù)仇行為的影響三個(gè)方面展開分析的。 本文主要是對(duì)歷史上的復(fù)仇思想做出分析,不僅試圖對(duì)復(fù)仇思想的產(chǎn)生、發(fā)展的歷史做出一定梳理,同時(shí)也試圖從儒家思想對(duì)復(fù)仇思想的影響和復(fù)仇思想產(chǎn)生的影響等問題做出分析和梳理。
[Abstract]:Revenge originated from the primitive period, after the emergence of the law, the law is basically prohibited for revenge, but there is also a certain degree of tolerance. In ancient China, many thinkers put forward their own views on revenge, and the thought of revenge in ancient China developed from simply discussing the results of specific revenge cases to designing the procedure for dealing with revenge cases. The revenge thought in ancient China can be said to be a microcosm of the combination of etiquette and law. In the process of combining etiquette and law, it is difficult to fundamentally oppose revenge because of the great influence of Confucianism on revenge in ancient China. Confucianism has a certain influence on revenge cases and the legal provisions on revenge through revenge thought. The number of revenge cases changes with the continuous adjustment between etiquette and law, but the revenge phenomenon has never disappeared. This paper mainly discusses from the following four chapters: the first chapter mainly introduces the concept of revenge, this chapter mainly defines the concept and origin of revenge. The second chapter mainly introduces the history of revenge thought in ancient China, which is divided into four periods: before the Han Dynasty, from the Han Dynasty to the Tang Dynasty, from the Tang Dynasty to the Tang Dynasty. The third chapter analyzes the influence of Confucianism on revenge thought, mainly analyzes the influence of Confucian thought of emphasizing propriety over law, filial piety, the principle of "moral principle and punishment auxiliary" and "original conviction" on revenge legal thought. The fourth chapter analyzes the influence of revenge legal thought from three aspects: the influence of revenge thought on legislation and judicature, the influence on mainstream values and the influence on revenge behavior. This paper mainly analyzes the revenge thought in history, and not only tries to sort out the emergence and development history of revenge thought. At the same time, it also tries to analyze and sort out the influence of Confucianism on revenge thought and revenge thought.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：青島大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D909.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 孫云;張學(xué)玲;;復(fù)仇法的遺留與任俠者的產(chǎn)生[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年02期

2 趙曉耕;;血親復(fù)仇與傳統(tǒng)的禮法沖突[J];法律與生活;2006年11期

3 王福友;;古代復(fù)仇對(duì)于侵權(quán)法功能的啟示[J];哈爾濱商業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年01期

4 楊士泰;;中國古代法律中的復(fù)仇問題研究[J];河北職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

5 蘇力;復(fù)仇與法律——以《趙氏孤兒》為例[J];法學(xué)研究;2005年01期

6 桂萍;;論中西文學(xué)復(fù)仇主題的文化傳承及嬗變[J];南京師范大學(xué)文學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

7 龍大軒;和諧思想與中國傳統(tǒng)法律的價(jià)值選擇[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2005年06期

8 張玉光;儒家孝義思想對(duì)傳統(tǒng)中國國家司法主義的影響——以“復(fù)仇”制度為論域的思考[J];西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期

9 孫光妍;;傳統(tǒng)法律文化與法治現(xiàn)代化的對(duì)接路徑[J];學(xué)術(shù)交流;2006年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 宣閣;中國古代復(fù)仇制度研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2006年

2 陳娜;中國古代司法中的情理探析[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2477421