風險控制的部門法思路及其超越
發(fā)布時間：2019-05-08 02:44
【摘要】：現(xiàn)代工業(yè)化引發(fā)的環(huán)境、健康、安全等公共風險極為特殊,風險控制已不再是純粹的私法自治議題。作為回應,不斷發(fā)展中的民法、刑法和行政法均將公共風險納入其調整范圍。但由于部門法壁壘的存在,中國"三足鼎立"的風險立法在運行層面呈現(xiàn)出"各自為政"的局面。這無助于風險控制工具之間的協(xié)調與合作。借助法經濟學的體系化解釋技術,散亂分布于各部門法的風險控制工具可被納入統(tǒng)一的分析框架。這不僅有助于打破部門法壁壘,而且能將各部門法上的風險控制工具體系化整合為"三位一體"的結構。構建這一法律結構首先要打造開放的部門法體系,其次要在部門法體系之外,借助行業(yè)單行立法搭建部門法之間的合作橋梁,風險立法由此呈現(xiàn)出部門法"分"與"合"的雙重變奏。
[Abstract]:The environment, health, safety and other public risks caused by modern industrialization are very special, and risk control is no longer a purely private law autonomy issue. In response, the evolving civil law, criminal law and administrative law all include public risk in its adjustment scope. However, due to the existence of sectoral legal barriers, China's "three-legged" risk legislation in the operational level presents a "separate government" situation. This is not conducive to coordination and cooperation among risk control tools. By means of systematized interpretation techniques of law economics, risk control tools scattered in various branches of law can be integrated into a unified analytical framework. This not only helps to break down the sectoral legal barriers, but also can systematize the risk control tools in various sectors into a "trinity" structure. To construct this legal structure, first of all, we should build an open department law system, and second, we should build a bridge of cooperation between department laws with the aid of industry single-line legislation outside the department law system. As a result, the risk legislation presents a double variation of "division" and "combination".
【作者單位】： 南京大學法學院;
【基金】：國家社會科學基金重大項目“民生視野下食品安全治理的法治化”(14ZDC028);國家社會科學基金青年項目“公共風險管控的公私法合作機制研究”(15CFX020)的前期成果
【分類號】：D910
本文編號：2471560
[Abstract]:The environment, health, safety and other public risks caused by modern industrialization are very special, and risk control is no longer a purely private law autonomy issue. In response, the evolving civil law, criminal law and administrative law all include public risk in its adjustment scope. However, due to the existence of sectoral legal barriers, China's "three-legged" risk legislation in the operational level presents a "separate government" situation. This is not conducive to coordination and cooperation among risk control tools. By means of systematized interpretation techniques of law economics, risk control tools scattered in various branches of law can be integrated into a unified analytical framework. This not only helps to break down the sectoral legal barriers, but also can systematize the risk control tools in various sectors into a "trinity" structure. To construct this legal structure, first of all, we should build an open department law system, and second, we should build a bridge of cooperation between department laws with the aid of industry single-line legislation outside the department law system. As a result, the risk legislation presents a double variation of "division" and "combination".
【作者單位】： 南京大學法學院;
【基金】：國家社會科學基金重大項目“民生視野下食品安全治理的法治化”(14ZDC028);國家社會科學基金青年項目“公共風險管控的公私法合作機制研究”(15CFX020)的前期成果
【分類號】：D910
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 翟寧娟;;部門法的成長邏輯與法的社會性趨向[J];社科縱橫;2007年08期
2 葉必豐;論部門法的劃分[J];法學評論;1996年03期
3 余俊;黃瑩;;部門法理學屬性辨析[J];甘肅社會科學;2014年01期
4 田洪生;法律體系及部門法[J];河北自學考試;1998年09期
5 王云霞;;部門法在西方的分離[J];法律文化研究;2005年00期
6 吳木鑾;;立法咋變成了“部門法”[J];中國經濟周刊;2006年45期
7 何文杰;;部門法理論革新論[J];蘭州大學學報(社會科學版);2007年04期
8 翟寧娟;;法的社會性的歷史訴求與現(xiàn)實趨向——以部門法的成長為視角[J];法制與社會;2007年11期
9 劉長秋;;論生命法的獨立部門法地位——兼對我國生命法學研究的未來展望[J];東方法學;2008年05期
10 朱翠微;;部門法理論的批判與重構[J];長春市委黨校學報;2010年05期
相關重要報紙文章 前3條
1 山東省棗莊市中級人民法院 李文;回到法理的門前[N];人民法院報;2011年
2 朱景文 中國人民大學法學院;在合與分之間[N];中國社會科學報;2009年
3 肖君擁 劉成偉;劃分法律部門不應只有一個標準[N];檢察日報;2003年
，本文編號：2471560
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2471560.html
