論法律家長主義在我國的運(yùn)用與限制
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-04-03 16:48
【摘要】：法律家長主義，從字面上就可以看出，它是將法律和公民之間比作家長和子女的關(guān)系：法律應(yīng)當(dāng)在保護(hù)與增加公民利益的目的基礎(chǔ)上對公民進(jìn)行約束教育，而公民應(yīng)當(dāng)出于對自身利益的考慮也應(yīng)當(dāng)服從這樣一種善意的干預(yù)并因此而受益。起源于或者類似倫理理念的法律家長主義在現(xiàn)代社會(huì)并不真正涉及倫理方面，它的核心問題在于自由——只有為了自由的緣故才能限制自由。在有限的可以理所應(yīng)當(dāng)限制自由的原則中，，包含法律家長主義，能夠被證成是有限制條件的，不是任何情況下都可以。在不同的文化背景、意識(shí)形態(tài)下，我們要在概念上對法律家長主義進(jìn)行澄清，進(jìn)而全面理解它的強(qiáng)制性與引導(dǎo)性。通過家長主義式的法律提升公民利益和福祉的同時(shí)，尋求自由和法律家長主義之間的合理界限具有更重要的意義。 本文建立在西方學(xué)者對法律家長主義的研究成果之上，旨在明晰界定家長主義式的法律，闡述其存在的合理性，進(jìn)而對研究法律家長主義在我國的具體運(yùn)用與限制做好理論鋪墊。文章對法律家長主義的概念、構(gòu)成條件及歷史流變進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)闡述；分別從人是一種“有朽”的理性動(dòng)物、法律經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的效益角度及社會(huì)權(quán)發(fā)展的現(xiàn)實(shí)需要三個(gè)角度分析論證了法律家長主義存在的合理性；在此基礎(chǔ)上，研究法律家長主義在我國的具體運(yùn)用，結(jié)合我國的立法實(shí)踐，分析在我國運(yùn)用的特點(diǎn)，著重介紹限制財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)方面的家長主義式法律；最后對法律家長主義的限制進(jìn)行相關(guān)探討，使其達(dá)到存在的目的——限制公民自由的同時(shí)提升公民的利益。 對于法律家長主義的研究，有利于我國民主法治建設(shè)的開展。本文就是要在現(xiàn)階段我國法治框架下，對法律家長主義進(jìn)行簡單梳理，使其在我國的運(yùn)用掌握在合理合法的限度之內(nèi)，為我所用。
[Abstract]:Legal parentheism, as can be seen from the word, is the relationship between the law and the citizen as a parent and a child: the law should educate the citizen on the basis of the protection and the increase of the interests of the citizens, Citizens should also be subject to such a kind of good faith and benefit from the consideration of their own interests. The legal parentheism, which originated from or similar to the ethical concept, does not really involve ethics in the modern society, and its core problem is that freedom can only be restricted for freedom. The principle of limited freedom to limit freedom, including legal parentheism, can be proved to be conditional, not in any case. Under the different cultural background and ideology, we should clarify the legal parentheism in the concept, and then fully understand its mandatory and guiding principles. It is of great significance to seek the reasonable boundaries between freedom and the law of the parents while promoting the interests and well-being of the citizens through the family-oriented law. This paper is based on the research results of the western scholars on the legal parentheism, and aims to clearly define the law of the patriarchism, and to explain the rationality of the law, and to lay a theoretical foundation for the study of the specific application and the limitation of the legal parentheism in our country. The article gives a detailed description of the concept, composition and history of the legal parentheism. From the perspective of the rational animal of the "to have a hand", the benefit of the legal economics and the reality of the development of the social right, it is necessary to analyze the rationality of the existence of the legal parentheism. On the basis of this, the study of the specific application of the legal parentheism in our country, in combination with our country's legislative practice, analyses the characteristics of the application in our country, and emphatically introduces the parental-type law on the limitation of property right; and finally, the limitation of the legal parentheism is discussed. To achieve the purpose of being present _ to limit civil liberties and to promote the benefit of a citizen. The study of the legal parentheism is beneficial to the construction of the democratic rule of law in our country. This paper, under the framework of the rule of law in our country, makes a simple analysis of the legal parentheism, so that its application in our country is within a reasonable and legal limit.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D909.2
本文編號(hào)：2453370
[Abstract]:Legal parentheism, as can be seen from the word, is the relationship between the law and the citizen as a parent and a child: the law should educate the citizen on the basis of the protection and the increase of the interests of the citizens, Citizens should also be subject to such a kind of good faith and benefit from the consideration of their own interests. The legal parentheism, which originated from or similar to the ethical concept, does not really involve ethics in the modern society, and its core problem is that freedom can only be restricted for freedom. The principle of limited freedom to limit freedom, including legal parentheism, can be proved to be conditional, not in any case. Under the different cultural background and ideology, we should clarify the legal parentheism in the concept, and then fully understand its mandatory and guiding principles. It is of great significance to seek the reasonable boundaries between freedom and the law of the parents while promoting the interests and well-being of the citizens through the family-oriented law. This paper is based on the research results of the western scholars on the legal parentheism, and aims to clearly define the law of the patriarchism, and to explain the rationality of the law, and to lay a theoretical foundation for the study of the specific application and the limitation of the legal parentheism in our country. The article gives a detailed description of the concept, composition and history of the legal parentheism. From the perspective of the rational animal of the "to have a hand", the benefit of the legal economics and the reality of the development of the social right, it is necessary to analyze the rationality of the existence of the legal parentheism. On the basis of this, the study of the specific application of the legal parentheism in our country, in combination with our country's legislative practice, analyses the characteristics of the application in our country, and emphatically introduces the parental-type law on the limitation of property right; and finally, the limitation of the legal parentheism is discussed. To achieve the purpose of being present _ to limit civil liberties and to promote the benefit of a citizen. The study of the legal parentheism is beneficial to the construction of the democratic rule of law in our country. This paper, under the framework of the rule of law in our country, makes a simple analysis of the legal parentheism, so that its application in our country is within a reasonable and legal limit.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D909.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 高家偉;論德國行政法的基本觀念[J];比較法研究;1997年03期
2 赫然;亓?xí)赠i;;法律父愛主義的可能困境及保障策略[J];長白學(xué)刊;2010年05期
3 孫笑俠,郭春鎮(zhèn);美國的法律家長主義理論與實(shí)踐[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年06期
4 林來梵;針對國家享有的財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)——從比較法角度的一個(gè)考察[J];法商研究;2003年01期
5 徐國棟;;民法私法說還能維持多久——行為經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)對時(shí)下民法學(xué)的潛在影響[J];法學(xué);2006年05期
6 黃文藝;;作為一種法律干預(yù)模式的家長主義[J];法學(xué)研究;2010年05期
7 童之偉;再論法理學(xué)的更新[J];法學(xué)研究;1999年02期
8 蔡陳聰;試析西方哲學(xué)史中的價(jià)值主觀論和客觀論——兼論價(jià)值范疇的一般本質(zhì)[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)輯刊;1998年01期
9 秦前紅;論我國憲法關(guān)于公民基本權(quán)利的限制規(guī)定[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期
10 松井茂記,莫紀(jì)宏;論自己決定權(quán)[J];外國法譯評;1996年03期
本文編號(hào)：2453370
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2453370.html
