論比較法的私法面向及其超越
發(fā)布時間：2019-03-22 06:21
【摘要】：公法與私法是法律的一個基本分類。自第一屆比較法國際大會時起,蘭伯特就強(qiáng)調(diào)比較法的主要領(lǐng)域是比較私法,必須放在大學(xué)課程中的優(yōu)先位置。盡管此種觀點(diǎn)越來越受到當(dāng)代比較法學(xué)家的質(zhì)疑,但不管是從歷史因素、文化因素還是從政治關(guān)聯(lián)度的因素來看,比較私法仍然是比較法的核心領(lǐng)域。中國比較法實(shí)踐似乎也表明比較法要超越傳統(tǒng)的私法范圍并不容易,比較公法研究與實(shí)踐仍然任重道遠(yuǎn),但這并不代表公法比較沒有意義或不可行,差距多、難度大反而凸顯了比較公法理論與實(shí)踐所蘊(yùn)藏的巨大理論與實(shí)踐價值,"經(jīng)由私法而超越私法"或許是比較法的未來方向。
[Abstract]:Public law and private law are a basic classification of law. Since the first International Congress on Comparative Law, Lambert has emphasized that the main field of comparative law is comparative private law, which must be given priority in university courses. Although this view is more and more questioned by the contemporary comparative jurists, the comparative private law is still the core field of comparative law in terms of historical factors, cultural factors and political relevance factors. The practice of Chinese comparative law also seems to indicate that it is not easy for comparative law to go beyond the scope of traditional private law, and the study and practice of comparative public law still have a long way to go, but this does not mean that the comparison of public law is meaningless or not feasible, and there are many gaps. The difficulty on the contrary highlights the great theoretical and practical value contained in the theory and practice of comparative public law. "transcending private law through private law" may be the future direction of comparative law.
【作者單位】： 中國政法大學(xué)比較法學(xué)研究院;
【基金】：中國政法大學(xué)中青年優(yōu)秀教師人才支持計(jì)劃 霍英東基金項(xiàng)目“消費(fèi)者合同法研究”(編號:141088)成果之一
【分類號】：D908
，
本文編號：2445335
[Abstract]:Public law and private law are a basic classification of law. Since the first International Congress on Comparative Law, Lambert has emphasized that the main field of comparative law is comparative private law, which must be given priority in university courses. Although this view is more and more questioned by the contemporary comparative jurists, the comparative private law is still the core field of comparative law in terms of historical factors, cultural factors and political relevance factors. The practice of Chinese comparative law also seems to indicate that it is not easy for comparative law to go beyond the scope of traditional private law, and the study and practice of comparative public law still have a long way to go, but this does not mean that the comparison of public law is meaningless or not feasible, and there are many gaps. The difficulty on the contrary highlights the great theoretical and practical value contained in the theory and practice of comparative public law. "transcending private law through private law" may be the future direction of comparative law.
【作者單位】： 中國政法大學(xué)比較法學(xué)研究院;
【基金】：中國政法大學(xué)中青年優(yōu)秀教師人才支持計(jì)劃 霍英東基金項(xiàng)目“消費(fèi)者合同法研究”(編號:141088)成果之一
【分類號】：D908
，
本文編號：2445335
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2445335.html
