發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-11-18 14:38

【摘要】：近年來(lái)，隨著我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)的快速發(fā)展，機(jī)動(dòng)車保有量迅猛增加，由此帶來(lái)的酒后駕車肇事現(xiàn)象愈演烈，引起了全社會(huì)的高度關(guān)注，社會(huì)各界就如何進(jìn)一步嚴(yán)懲酒后駕車違法現(xiàn)象展開了激烈爭(zhēng)論。本文試圖透過(guò)法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的視野，將我國(guó)酒后駕駛處罰制度還原到經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)中，運(yùn)用法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的分析方法對(duì)我國(guó)酒后駕駛處罰制度進(jìn)行考察，從全新的角度對(duì)我國(guó)酒后駕駛處罰制度的變遷提供的一些有益的參考。 文章第一部分簡(jiǎn)要敘述了我國(guó)酒后駕駛的界定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及其危害性，回顧了我國(guó)酒后駕駛處罰制度的發(fā)展，考察了部分發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家的酒后駕駛處罰制度，并闡述了用法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析的方法研究酒后駕駛處罰制度的意義。 文章第二部分從法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的角度，對(duì)我國(guó)酒后駕駛處罰制度的設(shè)計(jì)進(jìn)行了分析，闡述了制度在預(yù)防和懲罰醉酒駕駛上的功能定位、酒后駕駛處罰制度設(shè)計(jì)的基本原理，詳細(xì)分析了酒后駕駛處罰制度的公平與效率問(wèn)題，使讀者對(duì)我國(guó)酒后處罰制度設(shè)計(jì)的合理性有了更進(jìn)一步的認(rèn)識(shí)。 文章第三部分運(yùn)用法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)成本效益理論，從行政處罰和刑事處罰兩個(gè)方面，對(duì)我國(guó)酒后處罰制度的運(yùn)行情況進(jìn)行了全面、詳細(xì)的分析，指出了我國(guó)現(xiàn)行酒后處罰制度存在運(yùn)行成本高、效益低的缺陷，具體表現(xiàn)在：行政處罰執(zhí)法成本高但違法行為發(fā)現(xiàn)率低、查處率低，，刑事處罰同樣存在司法成本過(guò)高，但震懾效果差且執(zhí)行難度大的缺陷。 文章第四部分著重建議從減少成本、提高效益兩個(gè)方面進(jìn)一步優(yōu)化我國(guó)現(xiàn)有的酒后駕駛處罰制度，提出了運(yùn)用法律、行政和經(jīng)濟(jì)手段增加違法成本，明確罪名、引用判例節(jié)約司法成本，簡(jiǎn)化執(zhí)法程序降低執(zhí)法成本等途徑，減少酒后處罰制度的運(yùn)行成本；采取加強(qiáng)執(zhí)法監(jiān)督、擴(kuò)大責(zé)任追究主體和強(qiáng)化社會(huì)監(jiān)管力度等方法，提高酒后駕駛處罰制度的運(yùn)行效益，為我國(guó)酒后駕駛處罰制度的變遷提供了思路和模式借鑒。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the rapid development of our country's economy and society, the number of motor vehicles has increased rapidly, and the phenomenon of drunken driving has become more and more serious, which has aroused the attention of the whole society. All walks of life on how to further punish drunk driving illegal phenomenon launched fierce debate. Through the vision of law and economics, this paper attempts to restore the penalty system of drunk driving in our country to the economic society, and to investigate the penalty system of drunk driving in our country by using the analytical method of law and economics. From a new point of view, China's drunk driving penalty system changes to provide some useful reference. The first part of the article briefly describes the definition standards and harmfulness of drunk driving in China, reviews the development of the penalty system of drunk driving in China, and examines the penalty system of drunk driving in some developed countries. And elaborated the usage economics analysis method to study the drunk driving punishment system significance. In the second part, from the angle of law and economics, the author analyzes the design of the penalty system of drunk driving in our country, and expounds the function orientation of the system in preventing and punishing drunk driving, and the basic principle of the design of penalty system for drunk driving. This paper analyzes the fairness and efficiency of drunk driving punishment system in detail, which makes readers have a better understanding of the rationality of the design of drunk driving punishment system in China. In the third part, by using the cost-benefit theory of law and economics, the author makes a comprehensive and detailed analysis of the operation of the system of drunk punishment in China from two aspects: administrative punishment and criminal punishment. This paper points out that the current system of drunk punishment in our country has the defects of high running cost and low benefit, which is manifested in the following aspects: high cost of administrative punishment, low detection rate of illegal behavior, low rate of investigation and punishment, and too high judicial cost of criminal punishment. But the deterrent effect is bad and the execution difficulty is big flaw. In the fourth part of the article, it is suggested that the existing penalty system of drunk driving should be further optimized from the aspects of reducing cost and improving efficiency, and that the legal, administrative and economic means should be used to increase the illegal cost and make clear the crime. It can save the judicial cost, simplify the law enforcement procedure, reduce the law enforcement cost, and reduce the running cost of the drunk punishment system. In order to improve the efficiency of drunk driving punishment system, we should strengthen the supervision of law enforcement, expand the subject of responsibility investigation and strengthen social supervision, and provide some ideas and models for the change of drunk driving punishment system in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D922.14;D90-059

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳斌彬;余惠林;余紹山;;論我國(guó)刑事懸賞制度的完善——從法律經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的規(guī)角[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年02期

2 郭繼;;家庭土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)設(shè)立模式的立法選擇——以法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)和法社會(huì)學(xué)交叉為視角[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年01期

3 唐茂林;;我國(guó)農(nóng)村糾紛解決方式的轉(zhuǎn)型——以糾紛解決的成本為視角[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2008年14期

4 翁孫哲;;股份公司股東表決權(quán)限縮的激勵(lì)分析[J];安徽工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年01期

5 閻武;余華;;簡(jiǎn)析合同法中的違約制度[J];安陽(yáng)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年06期

6 萬(wàn)江;;霍布斯叢林的真實(shí)模擬——秩序形成的另類邏輯[J];北大法律評(píng)論;2007年02期

7 陳愷;;民事權(quán)利證券化的法律基礎(chǔ)[J];保定學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年06期

8 沃耘;;論物權(quán)自助行為——物權(quán)自我保護(hù)與實(shí)現(xiàn)之維度[J];北方法學(xué);2010年04期

9 徐艷;王冬梅;;論企業(yè)合并反壟斷控制中的效率抗辯[J];北方經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年08期

10 于寧;;公共執(zhí)法私人化的可能、條件與前景——以討債公司為研究對(duì)象[J];北京大學(xué)研究生學(xué)志;2009年02期

本文編號(hào)：2340317