論司法中的法律不確定性的法理分析
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-29 20:58
【摘要】：法律的確定性是法治的基礎。但是對于法律確定性這個問題，一直存在爭論。有的認為法律是絕對的確定的，因而適法者只是機械地把具體案件與法律規(guī)范對應起來，也有的認為法律的確定性不是絕對的，例如，法律原則的適用需要加入適法者的價值判斷。本文對法律確定性問題的不同觀點進行考察，認為法律是相對不確定的，并且這種不確定在司法過程中體現(xiàn)出來，導致司法的相對不確定。 全文分為三章，主要內(nèi)容如下： 第一章闡述從法律的確定性到法律的不確定性。法律確定性是法治的目標和要求，通過西方關于法律確定性問題的相關理論，認識法律不確定性的客觀存在，并分析這種不確定性對現(xiàn)實產(chǎn)生的影響。 第二章研究司法過程中的法律不確定性。主要是從兩個方面進行分析，一方面對司法過程中的法律不確定的表現(xiàn)加以分析，包括法律概念的不確定、法律事實認定的不確定、法律規(guī)則的不確定和裁判的不確定另一個方面分析造成司法過程中這些不確定性表現(xiàn)的原因，筆者認為主要原因在于法律語言的開放性、立法的局限、社會生活的復雜和法官本身所受到的影響。 第三章思考應對司法過程中的法律不確定性的措施。當前學界對這個問題的觀點較多，文中主要對法官自由裁量、司法解釋和引入判例的觀點進行了評述。并在前人研究的基礎上，針對造成法律不確定的因素，思考促進法律確定性的途徑，，認為當前我們可以通過完善立法、加強法律適用的程序設置、提高法官素質(zhì)、法律解釋、漏洞補充和價值衡量等措施，應對司法過程中的法律不確定。
[Abstract]:Legal certainty is the foundation of the rule of law. However, there has always been an argument about legal certainty. Some think that the law is absolutely certain, so that the fittest merely mechanically corresponds the specific case to the legal norm, and others think that the certainty of the law is not absolute, for example, The application of the principle of law needs to add the value judgment of the applicable person. This paper investigates the different viewpoints of the legal certainty, and thinks that the law is relatively uncertain, and this uncertainty is reflected in the judicial process, which leads to the relative uncertainty of the judicature. The paper is divided into three chapters. The main contents are as follows: the first chapter expounds from legal certainty to legal uncertainty. Legal certainty is the goal and requirement of the rule of law. Through the relevant theories about legal certainty in the west, the objective existence of legal uncertainty is recognized and the influence of this uncertainty on reality is analyzed. The second chapter studies the legal uncertainty in the judicial process. On the one hand, it analyzes the expression of the legal uncertainty in the judicial process, including the uncertainty of the legal concept, the uncertainty of the determination of the legal facts, The uncertainty of the legal rules and the uncertainty of the referee another aspect of the analysis of the causes of these uncertainties in the judicial process, the author believes that the main reasons are the openness of the legal language, the limitations of legislation, The complexity of social life and the impact on the judge himself. The third chapter considers the measures to deal with the legal uncertainty in the judicial process. There are many views on this issue in the academic circles. This paper mainly comments on the judges' discretion, judicial interpretation and the introduction of jurisprudence. On the basis of previous studies, the author thinks about the ways to promote legal certainty in view of the factors that cause the uncertainty of law, and thinks that at present we can improve legislation, strengthen the procedure of law application, improve the quality of judges, and explain the law. Measures such as loophole supplement and value measurement should be taken to deal with the legal uncertainty in the judicial process.
【學位授予單位】：廣州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D90
本文編號：2298807
[Abstract]:Legal certainty is the foundation of the rule of law. However, there has always been an argument about legal certainty. Some think that the law is absolutely certain, so that the fittest merely mechanically corresponds the specific case to the legal norm, and others think that the certainty of the law is not absolute, for example, The application of the principle of law needs to add the value judgment of the applicable person. This paper investigates the different viewpoints of the legal certainty, and thinks that the law is relatively uncertain, and this uncertainty is reflected in the judicial process, which leads to the relative uncertainty of the judicature. The paper is divided into three chapters. The main contents are as follows: the first chapter expounds from legal certainty to legal uncertainty. Legal certainty is the goal and requirement of the rule of law. Through the relevant theories about legal certainty in the west, the objective existence of legal uncertainty is recognized and the influence of this uncertainty on reality is analyzed. The second chapter studies the legal uncertainty in the judicial process. On the one hand, it analyzes the expression of the legal uncertainty in the judicial process, including the uncertainty of the legal concept, the uncertainty of the determination of the legal facts, The uncertainty of the legal rules and the uncertainty of the referee another aspect of the analysis of the causes of these uncertainties in the judicial process, the author believes that the main reasons are the openness of the legal language, the limitations of legislation, The complexity of social life and the impact on the judge himself. The third chapter considers the measures to deal with the legal uncertainty in the judicial process. There are many views on this issue in the academic circles. This paper mainly comments on the judges' discretion, judicial interpretation and the introduction of jurisprudence. On the basis of previous studies, the author thinks about the ways to promote legal certainty in view of the factors that cause the uncertainty of law, and thinks that at present we can improve legislation, strengthen the procedure of law application, improve the quality of judges, and explain the law. Measures such as loophole supplement and value measurement should be taken to deal with the legal uncertainty in the judicial process.
【學位授予單位】：廣州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D90
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 黃金榮;法的形式理性論——以法之確定性問題為中心[J];比較法研究;2000年03期
2 卡爾·拉倫茨 ,趙陽;論作為科學的法學的不可或缺性——1966年4月20日在柏林法學會的演講[J];比較法研究;2005年03期
3 張偉強;;審判的法律效果與社會效果——法官應該追求什么[J];法律方法;2009年00期
4 王晨光;法律運行中的不確定性與“錯案追究制”的誤區(qū)[J];法學;1997年03期
5 鄭永流;法律判斷形成的模式[J];法學研究;2004年01期
6 呂芳;穿行于理想和現(xiàn)實之間的平衡——從法律文化的視角解讀“法律效果和社會效果的統(tǒng)一”[J];法學論壇;2005年03期
7 王偉國;;從不確定中追求確定——論法官自由裁量權及其治理[J];山東審判(山東法官培訓學院學報);2006年02期
8 舒國瀅;法律原則適用的困境——方法論視角的四個追問[J];蘇州大學學報;2005年01期
9 王建;;法律語言的模糊性及準確運用[J];西南政法大學學報;2006年02期
10 郇興艷;;法的確定性與法治的實現(xiàn)[J];延邊大學學報(社會科學版);2009年06期
相關碩士學位論文 前2條
1 朱勇;法官自由裁量權的范圍和限度[D];南京師范大學;2003年
2 羅瑜;和諧語境下法律效果和社會效果統(tǒng)一的探究[D];湖南大學;2008年
本文編號：2298807
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2298807.html
