【摘要】：軸心時代之先秦時期，可謂百花燦放，眾家爭鳴，，逐形成吾國博大精深之文化遺產(chǎn)。而諸子百家中最趨近“科學(xué)思想”之墨家文化更是在先秦諸子論述中獨樹一幟，并成為當(dāng)時兩大“顯學(xué)”之一。作為墨家文化重要組成部分的“墨辯”不僅作為其“三務(wù)”之一，更是成為了中國古代邏輯發(fā)源之一。自清末以降，墨辯雖得短暫復(fù)興，但眾家所論者多為墨辯撥正而敘，少有應(yīng)用之論。此非墨家之主旨，墨家所言甚多，然中心者為“用”。職是之故，本文從“用”出發(fā)，將墨辯適用于法律之中。墨辯言推理，談類故；而法學(xué)也說推理，要類故。然現(xiàn)今法學(xué)界，言必稱泰希，詞必曰歐美。法律適用理論亦染此風(fēng)，卻不知有墨家辯學(xué)之邏輯方法。本文在論述墨辯范圍及其特征的基礎(chǔ)上，還討論墨辯何以能用于法律之中。在解決了上述問題后，本文擬介紹作為墨辯文化特色的三物論式在法律中的適用。在邏輯學(xué)界向來將其與西方的三段論相比較，各種優(yōu)劣瑕瑜，盡顯國人思維與西方人思維之不同�；仡櫮有雄E，可知曉其非常重視“用”的觀點，并追求將理論與實踐之統(tǒng)一。對于如何將墨辯邏輯應(yīng)用于司法實踐，本文簡單的列舉了幾則案例，并從古今兩面進(jìn)行考量。顯學(xué)重光，故本文試圖將墨辯應(yīng)用于我國司法活動之中，一則明以墨釋墨，以國人文化、歷史釋墨；二則拓展墨辯之研究，開闊法律適用之場域及視野。
[Abstract]:Axis era of the pre-Qin period, can be said to blossom, family contending, form our country's profound cultural heritage. The Mohist culture, which is the most close to the "scientific thought" among the hundred schools of thought, was unique in the pre-Qin school of thought and became one of the two "prominent schools" at that time. As an important part of Mohist culture, Mohism is not only one of its "three things", but also one of the origin of ancient Chinese logic. Since the end of the Qing Dynasty, Mohism has been a brief revival, but many scholars say that Mohism is correct and rarely applied. This is not the main idea of Mohism, Mohism says a lot, but the center for the "use." Therefore, this paper applies the Mohist argument to the law from the perspective of "use". Mo argument reasoning, talking about class reason, and law also said reasoning, to class reason. But now in the field of law, the word must be called Tahi, and the word must be called Europe and America. The theory of application of law also infects this trend, but does not know the logical method of Mohist argumentation. On the basis of discussing the scope and characteristics of Mohist argument, this paper also discusses why Mohist argument can be used in law. After solving the above problems, this paper will introduce the application of the three-thing theory in law as the characteristic of Mohist culture. Logic has always compared it with western syllogism, which shows the difference between Chinese thinking and Western thinking. Looking back on Mozi's practice, we can know that Mozi attaches great importance to "use" and seeks to unify theory with practice. As to how to apply Mohist logic to judicial practice, this paper simply enumerates several cases and considers them from ancient and modern aspects. Therefore, this paper tries to apply ink debate to the judicial activities of our country, one is to expound ink with ink, the other is to expand the study of ink debate and broaden the field and field of application of law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D90-051

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 胡光志;;通向人性的復(fù)興與和諧之路——民法與經(jīng)濟法本質(zhì)的另一種解讀[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2007年02期

本文編號：2267270