【摘要】：目前，警察圈套在我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中被大量的使用。與其他偵破手段相比，警察圈套的優(yōu)勢(shì)是更容易取得直接的犯罪證據(jù)，提高相關(guān)部門的工作效率。但是在這種無(wú)可比擬的優(yōu)勢(shì)下，卻潛藏著許多問(wèn)題，其弊端日益暴露出來(lái)。在我國(guó)的法律體系中,至今仍然沒(méi)有形成針對(duì)警察圈套的法律法規(guī)。從警察圈套抗辯事由這一方面制定相關(guān)的法律法規(guī),是希望能夠完善被告人事后的救濟(jì)制度。警察圈套抗辯事由指的是落入警察圈套的被告人以落入警察圈套為由展開(kāi)的辯護(hù)，抗辯事由在認(rèn)定落入警察圈套的被告人有罪與否,罪輕與否,起到了關(guān)鍵的作用。如果法律上明確的規(guī)定警察圈套的抗辯制度，并規(guī)定了具備可行性的細(xì)則，那么被告人在實(shí)踐中就就有法可依，而且更具操作性。制定事后的救濟(jì)制度，就是為了保證警察圈套這種偵查行為的優(yōu)勢(shì)能夠發(fā)揮出來(lái)，同時(shí)，在最大程度上減少其帶來(lái)的負(fù)面作用，體現(xiàn)我國(guó)對(duì)人權(quán)保障的重視。 首先介紹的是美國(guó)的警察圈套的相關(guān)內(nèi)容。包括了定義、特征、以及警察圈套在刑法中的意義等方面，使讀者大概了解了美國(guó)的警察圈套。其次，主要介紹了美國(guó)警察辯護(hù)事由的成立標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，美國(guó)警察圈套的抗辯都是圍繞著成立標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行的，采用什么樣的成立標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行判斷，就直接決定著被告人抗辯是否能夠成功，所以這一部分是美國(guó)關(guān)于警察圈套抗辯最重要因素。著重介紹分析其抗辯事由，對(duì)我國(guó)法律規(guī)定警察圈套抗辯這一方面是很有幫助的。最后，是對(duì)我國(guó)警察圈套抗辯制度的建構(gòu)。在這一部分中，，首先分析了警察圈套抗辯在我國(guó)適用的必要性和意義，這是建立適合我國(guó)的警察圈套抗辯制度的前提條件。在此基礎(chǔ)上結(jié)合我國(guó)的實(shí)際情況，建立警察圈套的抗辯制度體系：確定警察圈套基本的內(nèi)容（定義釋義、適用范圍和類型，成立要件等）、建立適用我國(guó)的辯護(hù)的成立標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、規(guī)定抗辯成立主體的刑事責(zé)任等等。
[Abstract]:At present, police trap is widely used in judicial practice in our country. Compared with other detection methods, the advantage of police trap is that it is easier to obtain direct evidence of crime and improve the efficiency of relevant departments. But in this kind of unparalleled superiority, but latent many problems, its malpractice is exposed day by day. In our country's legal system, there are still no laws and regulations for police trap. It is hoped that the relief system of the defendant can be perfected by making relevant laws and regulations from the police entrapment defense. The defense of police entrapment refers to the defense of the defendant who falls into the police trap on the grounds of falling into the police trap. The defense reason plays a key role in determining whether the defendant who falls into the police trap is guilty or not and whether the crime is misdemeanor or not. If the law explicitly stipulates the defense system of the police trap and the detailed rules with feasibility, then the defendant will have the law to abide by in practice, and it will be more operable. The purpose of setting up the relief system after the event is to ensure that the advantages of police entrapment can be brought into play, at the same time, to minimize its negative effects, and to reflect the importance our country attaches to the protection of human rights. First of all, it introduces the relevant contents of the police trap in the United States. Including the definition, characteristics, and the meaning of police trap in criminal law, so that the reader may understand the police trap in the United States. Secondly, it mainly introduces the establishment standard of American police defense. The defense of American police trap is carried out around the standard of establishment. What kind of standard is used to judge, which directly determines whether the defendant's defense can be successful or not. So this part is the most important factor about the police trap defense in the United States. It is very helpful to introduce and analyze the defense reasons of police entrapment in our country. Finally, the construction of police entrapment defense system in China. In this part, the author first analyzes the necessity and significance of the application of police entrapment defense in our country, which is the precondition of establishing the police trap defense system suitable for our country. On this basis, combining with the actual situation of our country, the defense system of police trap is established: the basic content of police trap (definition, scope and type of application, the elements of establishment, etc.), the establishment standard of defense applicable to our country, etc. Stipulate the criminal responsibility of the subject of the establishment of the defense and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D971.2;DD914

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 鄭金焱;;我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中的“警察圈套”問(wèn)題[J];湖北經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年02期

2 黃繼坤,田茜;美國(guó)刑法中的“警察圈套”[J];湖北廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2005年05期

3 李永升;汪潔;;陷害教唆與警察圈套的刑法學(xué)思考[J];河南司法警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

4 宛霞;;淺論警察圈套的界定及其刑法規(guī)制[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期

5 杭正亞;警察圈套怎樣才能具備合法性[J];人民公安;2001年23期

6 鎖正杰;圈套在美國(guó)的判例[J];人民公安;2001年23期

7 于改之;郭獻(xiàn)朝;;兩大法系犯罪論體系的比較與借鑒[J];法學(xué)論壇;2006年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 肖玲;美國(guó)刑法中的警察圈套制度及其對(duì)我國(guó)的借鑒意義[D];湘潭大學(xué);2007年

本文編號(hào)：2232355