【摘要】：由于法律的缺失以及中國傳統(tǒng)的影響,晚清中國政府經(jīng)常利用民事習(xí)慣來解決涉外債務(wù)糾紛,其中最重要的是調(diào)解息訟制度。這一制度是清政府主動(dòng)提出并載入中外條約的,西方列強(qiáng)為了保證對(duì)華貿(mào)易的順利開展也有調(diào)解民事糾紛的需要,因而調(diào)解息訟在晚清中國民間涉外債務(wù)案件的解決中得到廣泛運(yùn)用。對(duì)中國政府來說,調(diào)解息訟有效地避免了處理債務(wù)訴訟的困難和麻煩,減少了中外之間的貿(mào)易和外交沖突;對(duì)涉?zhèn)娜A民與外人來說,也免除了諸多訴訟的拖累和煩擾。但這一制度也存在難以保證公正性等局限。
[Abstract]:Due to the lack of law and the influence of Chinese tradition, the Chinese government often used civil custom to solve the foreign debt disputes in the late Qing Dynasty, the most important of which was the system of interest litigation. This system was put forward by the Qing government on its own initiative and entered into treaties between China and foreign countries. In order to ensure the smooth development of trade with China, Western powers also had the need to mediate civil disputes. Therefore, mediation interest litigation was widely used in the settlement of foreign debt cases in late Qing Dynasty. For the Chinese government, the mediation effectively avoids the difficulties and troubles in handling debt litigation, reduces trade and diplomatic conflicts between China and foreign countries, and relieves the burden and annoyance of many lawsuits for Chinese citizens and outsiders involved in debt. However, the system also has some limitations, such as the difficulty of ensuring fairness.
【作者單位】： 湖南師范大學(xué)歷史文化學(xué)院;

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 本報(bào)見習(xí)記者 李瑾;廣匯能源債務(wù)糾紛升級(jí)：靜待法院判決[N];證券日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

2 董洪亮;避免因債務(wù)糾紛“封校門”[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

3 ;解決債務(wù)糾紛防止社會(huì)矛盾[N];中國企業(yè)報(bào);2009年

4 本報(bào)記者 汪s，

本文編號(hào)：2218678