中日行政指導(dǎo)比較研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-16 10:42
【摘要】：本文采用比較研究的方法,在仔細研讀前人關(guān)于行政指導(dǎo)比較研究著作的基礎(chǔ)上,對中國和日本兩個國家的行政指導(dǎo)制度就其產(chǎn)生的背景、理論知識基礎(chǔ),兩國對行政指導(dǎo)概念以及性質(zhì)的相關(guān)觀點、以及行政指導(dǎo)在中國和日本兩國各自的立法實踐活動和具體指導(dǎo)活動,進行了一個相對細致的對比分析。在此基礎(chǔ)上對兩國學(xué)術(shù)界就行政指導(dǎo)相關(guān)理論的異同進行了一些總結(jié)工作,并對有所爭議的部分提出了一些自己的看法,認為研究的立場不應(yīng)拘泥于過于絕對的角度,要有統(tǒng)籌全局的目光,來對具體問題進行具體分析。同時對我國行政指導(dǎo)制度的完善,從行為依據(jù)、程序設(shè)計、法律責(zé)任、救濟制度等幾個方面,來進行具體的闡述,希望可以為我國行政指導(dǎo)制度的完善提供一些思路。
[Abstract]:On the basis of careful study of the previous works on comparative research of administrative guidance, this paper uses the method of comparative study to analyze the background and theoretical knowledge of the administrative guidance system of China and Japan. The two countries make a comparative analysis of the concept and nature of administrative guidance, as well as their respective legislative practice and specific guidance activities in China and Japan. On this basis, this paper summarizes the similarities and differences of the relevant theories of administrative guidance between the academic circles of the two countries, and puts forward some views on the controversial parts, and thinks that the research position should not be confined to the angle of too absolute. Must have the overall plan overall situation vision, carries on the concrete analysis to the concrete question. At the same time, the perfection of our country's administrative guidance system, from the behavior basis, the procedure design, the legal responsibility, the relief system and so on several aspects, carries on the concrete elaboration, hopes to provide some ideas for our country's administrative guidance system consummation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：長春理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D931.3;D922.1
本文編號：2185741
[Abstract]:On the basis of careful study of the previous works on comparative research of administrative guidance, this paper uses the method of comparative study to analyze the background and theoretical knowledge of the administrative guidance system of China and Japan. The two countries make a comparative analysis of the concept and nature of administrative guidance, as well as their respective legislative practice and specific guidance activities in China and Japan. On this basis, this paper summarizes the similarities and differences of the relevant theories of administrative guidance between the academic circles of the two countries, and puts forward some views on the controversial parts, and thinks that the research position should not be confined to the angle of too absolute. Must have the overall plan overall situation vision, carries on the concrete analysis to the concrete question. At the same time, the perfection of our country's administrative guidance system, from the behavior basis, the procedure design, the legal responsibility, the relief system and so on several aspects, carries on the concrete elaboration, hopes to provide some ideas for our country's administrative guidance system consummation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：長春理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D931.3;D922.1
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條
1 莫于川;行政指導(dǎo)比較研究[J];比較法研究;2004年05期
2 李杰;日本行政指導(dǎo)在產(chǎn)業(yè)政策中的運用及對我國的啟示[J];涪陵師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年06期
3 肖陸軍;中外行政指導(dǎo)比較研究初探[J];四川師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2002年06期
4 肖陸軍;;行政指導(dǎo)概論[J];廣西教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年05期
5 秦鐵錚;法治視野中的日本行政指導(dǎo)[J];日本研究;2005年02期
6 尚秋謹;;日本行政指導(dǎo)及其對我國的啟示[J];北京行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年06期
7 上海市人民政府行政法制研究所“行政指導(dǎo)”課題組;中國行政指導(dǎo)的實踐與理論研究(上)[J];政治與法律;2003年03期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 朱中一;法治視野中的中國行政指導(dǎo)[D];蘇州大學(xué);2004年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 譚鐵索;試論我國行政指導(dǎo)制度的完善[D];湖南大學(xué);2007年
2 錢焰青;我國行政指導(dǎo)的法律救濟制度研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2007年
3 盧婧;行政指導(dǎo)的比較法學(xué)透視[D];南京師范大學(xué);2007年
，本文編號：2185741
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2185741.html
