【摘要】：法治是國(guó)家治理的基礎(chǔ)和基本方式。隨著我國(guó)法治進(jìn)程的逐步深入,作為兼具約束及激勵(lì)功能的管理工具與技術(shù)手段,法治評(píng)估愈來(lái)愈得到實(shí)務(wù)界與學(xué)術(shù)界的高度重視。隨著世界各國(guó)或地區(qū)法治進(jìn)程的不斷推進(jìn),很多區(qū)域都在探索法治量化評(píng)估的道路。各個(gè)區(qū)域通過(guò)把法治指數(shù)量化,變抽象的法治概念為具體的法治指數(shù),通過(guò)直觀數(shù)據(jù)的對(duì)比分析,以此來(lái)衡量和評(píng)價(jià)國(guó)家或地區(qū)的法治發(fā)展水平。法治量化評(píng)估作為法治研究的一種新方式,其涵蓋的范圍極其寬泛,建立一套科學(xué)的法治量化評(píng)估體系則是進(jìn)行法治量化評(píng)估的必要保障。近年來(lái),我國(guó)法治建設(shè)和法治理論研究成果顯著,關(guān)于法治量化評(píng)估的實(shí)證研究也取得了長(zhǎng)足發(fā)展。在借鑒其它國(guó)家或地區(qū)的法治評(píng)估實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)的基礎(chǔ)之上,我國(guó)的法治量化探索之路更需要立足國(guó)情,構(gòu)建具有中國(guó)特色的法治量化評(píng)估指標(biāo)體系。江蘇省是全國(guó)較早探索法治量化評(píng)估之路的省份之一,并制定了一系列具有本土特色的法治量化評(píng)估體系,并且在實(shí)踐中探索出了一套具有可操作性的考核評(píng)估方法,在全國(guó)具有可復(fù)制、可推廣的示范價(jià)值�；谥袊�(guó)的法治量化評(píng)估指標(biāo)體系的構(gòu)建和法治定量化評(píng)估仍在探索的過(guò)程中,因此,總結(jié)江蘇經(jīng)驗(yàn),發(fā)現(xiàn)其存在的問(wèn)題,完善其區(qū)域法治評(píng)估體系,以此來(lái)提升法治評(píng)估的效度與可信度。通過(guò)提升區(qū)域法治評(píng)估的實(shí)踐成效,進(jìn)而有效地推進(jìn)法治江蘇建設(shè),為法治中國(guó)建設(shè)的理論與實(shí)踐提供典型樣本。
[Abstract]:Rule of law is the foundation and basic way of national governance. With the gradual deepening of the process of rule of law in our country, as a management tool and technical means with both constraints and incentive functions, the evaluation of rule of law has been paid more and more attention by the practical and academic circles. With the advancement of the process of rule of law in many countries and regions, many regions are exploring the way of quantitative evaluation of rule of law. By quantifying the index of the rule of law and changing the abstract concept of the rule of law into the concrete index of the rule of law, each region measures and evaluates the level of the development of the rule of law in a country or region through the contrast and analysis of the intuitionistic data. As a new way to study the rule of law, the quantitative evaluation of the rule of law covers a wide range, and the establishment of a scientific system of quantitative evaluation of the rule of law is the necessary guarantee for the quantitative evaluation of the rule of law. In recent years, there have been remarkable achievements in the construction of the rule of law and the theory of the rule of law, and the empirical research on the quantitative evaluation of the rule of law has also made great progress. On the basis of drawing lessons from the practical experience of other countries or regions in the evaluation of the rule of law, it is necessary to establish a quantitative evaluation index system of the rule of law with Chinese characteristics on the basis of the national conditions and the way to explore the quantification of the rule of law in our country. Jiangsu Province is one of the provinces that explored the way of quantitative evaluation of the rule of law earlier in the country, and has formulated a series of quantitative evaluation system of the rule of law with local characteristics, and has explored a set of operable assessment methods in practice. It has the demonstration value of replicating and popularizing in the whole country. The construction of quantitative evaluation index system of rule of law and the quantitative evaluation of rule of law based on China are still in the process of exploration. Therefore, summing up the experience of Jiangsu, finding out the existing problems, perfecting its regional evaluation system of rule of law, In order to enhance the validity and credibility of the rule of law evaluation. By improving the practical effect of regional evaluation of rule of law, we can effectively promote the construction of Jiangsu under the rule of law, and provide a typical sample for the theory and practice of the construction of ruled by law in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D920.0

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 韓旭;鐘凱;;地方法治量化評(píng)估若干理論與實(shí)踐問(wèn)題研究——以S省依法行政第三方評(píng)估為例[J];河南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年02期

2 申靜;杜媛媛;;河北省法治政府評(píng)估指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建及路徑分析[J];法制與社會(huì);2016年04期

3 錢(qián)弘道;王朝霞;;論中國(guó)法治評(píng)估的轉(zhuǎn)型[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué);2015年05期

4 周尚君;彭浩;;可量化的正義:地方法治指數(shù)評(píng)估體系研究報(bào)告[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2014年02期

5 孫建;;我國(guó)法治城市評(píng)估的發(fā)展與現(xiàn)狀研究[J];中國(guó)司法;2014年03期

6 蔣立山;;中國(guó)法治指數(shù)設(shè)計(jì)的理論問(wèn)題[J];法學(xué)家;2014年01期

7 征國(guó)忠;;法治揚(yáng)州的量化評(píng)估研究[J];學(xué)理論;2013年34期

8 張保生;鄭飛;;世界法治指數(shù)對(duì)中國(guó)法治評(píng)估的借鑒意義[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2013年06期

9 侯學(xué)賓;姚建宗;;中國(guó)法治指數(shù)設(shè)計(jì)的思想維度[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2013年05期

10 王朝霞;;法治評(píng)估與法治創(chuàng)新——基于浙江余杭實(shí)踐的討論[J];廣西民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年04期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 姚建宗;;法治指數(shù)設(shè)計(jì)的思想維度[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 劉藝琳;地方政府法治指標(biāo)評(píng)估體系研究[D];東北大學(xué);2014年

2 杜明遠(yuǎn);城市法治量化評(píng)估研究[D];遼寧師范大學(xué);2013年

3 谷小娟;法治建設(shè)量化評(píng)估研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：2176487