【摘要】：作為司法機(jī)關(guān)依法對案件實(shí)體部分作出的法律判斷,判決結(jié)果能否得到判決受眾的接受是衡量司法判決質(zhì)量的重要標(biāo)準(zhǔn),而判決受眾主要包括法律職業(yè)共同體、當(dāng)事人和社會公眾。司法領(lǐng)域“唯一正解”命題的破產(chǎn)凸顯了司法共識在糾紛解決過程中的關(guān)鍵作用,司法判決在司法共識邏輯起點(diǎn)的基礎(chǔ)上才能導(dǎo)向案結(jié)事了的實(shí)踐終點(diǎn)。在權(quán)威維度向社會維度轉(zhuǎn)向的過程中,‘個人因素在法哲學(xué)領(lǐng)域不斷得到彰顯,并在立法、司法與個人的關(guān)系演進(jìn)過程中得以體現(xiàn)。新修辭學(xué)法學(xué)促進(jìn)了判決可接受性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的確立,并分別將聽眾理論和修辭論證作為分析框架和實(shí)現(xiàn)方式。司法判決可接受性理念要求法官采取實(shí)用主義審判方式,進(jìn)行后果主義推理,奉行價值多元主義。在實(shí)體層面,司法判決向可接受性的趨近需要在判決事實(shí)、判決理由和判決論證三個方面作出努力。在程序?qū)用?司法判決向可接受性的趨近需要在權(quán)能配置、受眾監(jiān)督和程序說理三個方面進(jìn)行完善。司法與民意的關(guān)系問題一直都是學(xué)界和司法界面臨的一個重大難題,司法民主化理論為這一問題的解決提供了較為明晰的努力方向。
[Abstract]:As the legal judgment made by the judicial organs on the substantive part of the case according to law, whether the judgment result can be accepted by the judgment audience is an important criterion to measure the quality of the judicial judgment, and the judgment audience mainly includes the legal professional community. The parties and the public. The bankruptcy of the proposition of "only positive solution" in the judicial field highlights the key role of judicial consensus in the process of dispute resolution. Judicial decision can lead to the end of the case on the basis of the logical starting point of judicial consensus. In the process of turning from the authority dimension to the social dimension, the personal factor is constantly displayed in the field of legal philosophy, and is reflected in the evolution of the relationship between the legislation, the judiciary and the individual. The new rhetoric law promotes the establishment of the criterion of admissibility of judgment, and takes the theory of audience and the rhetorical argumentation as the analytical framework and the way of realization respectively. The concept of acceptability of judicial decision requires judges to adopt pragmatic trial mode, to carry out consequence reasoning and to pursue value pluralism. At the substantive level, the approach of judicial decision to acceptability needs to make efforts in three aspects: the fact of judgment, the reason of judgment and the proof of judgment. At the procedural level, the approach of judicial decision to acceptability needs to be perfected in three aspects: power allocation, audience supervision and procedural reasoning. The relationship between justice and public opinion has always been a major problem faced by scholars and judicial circles. The theory of judicial democratization provides a clear direction for the solution of this problem.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D90-055

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 孫光寧;武興偉;;民法解釋的特征及其運(yùn)作[J];湖北社會科學(xué);2008年10期

2 陳林林;;基于法律原則的裁判[J];法學(xué)研究;2006年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 孫光寧;可接受性：法律方法的一個分析視角[D];山東大學(xué);2010年

2 陳金木;判決可接受性的實(shí)證研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 鮑然;論司法判決的可接受性[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

2 劉蕾;論判決的可接受性[D];廈門大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號：2164442