本文選題：唐代 + 雜治　； 參考：《法律科學(西北政法大學學報)》2017年02期

【摘要】：唐代永徽以后,雜治并未被三司推事所徹底取代,反而對“三司”制度形成相當沖擊與影響,所謂“三司推事”常有名實不符之困境。究其根本,乃是雜治慣例持續(xù)起效之表征�！笆苁氯尽钡闹鸩降雠c“推事三司”之尷尬境遇,均源自傳統(tǒng)雜治慣例的強勢干預。從雜治到三司,乃至三司使的出現(xiàn),群臣雜治慣例始終是唐代詔獄會審之主流模式,御史臺在雜治規(guī)則運行中占據優(yōu)越地位。至中晚唐時期,雜治地位呈現(xiàn)下移趨勢。
[Abstract]:After the Tang Dynasty Yonghui, miscellaneous governance was not completely replaced by the "three divisions" judge, on the contrary, the "three divisions" system formed a considerable impact and influence, the so-called "three divisions" often do not agree with the plight of the name. The root of it is the symbol of the continuous effect of the rule of miscellaneous governance. The gradual fading out of the "three divisions" and the embarrassing situation of the "three divisions of judges" all stem from the strong intervention of the traditional miscellaneous rule. From miscellaneous governance to three departments, and even the emergence of the three departments, the rule of miscellaneous governance of officials has always been the mainstream mode of the imperial court in the Tang Dynasty, and the imperial court occupies a superior position in the operation of miscellaneous governance rules. To the middle and late Tang Dynasty, the status of miscellaneous governance showed a downward trend.
【作者單位】： 西北政法大學刑事法學院;
【分類號】：DF092

【相似文獻】

相關重要報紙文章 前6條

1 方寶璋;三司審計話五代[N];中國審計報;2002年

2 方寶璋;遼、金審計仿唐宋[N];中國審計報;2003年

3 方寶璋;宋代審計的特點與得失[N];中國審計報;2003年

4 朱兆龍;君子正其衣冠[N];北京日報;2014年

5 虞云國;設置變法“總樞紐”的利弊[N];東方早報;2014年

6 ;包公為何傳千古[N];檢察日報;2002年

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 黃亞娟;北宋三司使研究[D];河南大學;2006年

2 王盈;論宋代茶法的制定[D];復旦大學;2011年

，

本文編號：2113074