本文選題：法治融貫 + 法治中國　； 參考：《東北師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：十八屆四中全會召開以來,“全面推進(jìn)依法治國”為我國法治中國建設(shè)規(guī)劃了系統(tǒng)的發(fā)展方向和奮斗目標(biāo),“堅(jiān)持走中國特色社會主義法治道路,建設(shè)中國特色社會主義法治體系”彰顯了法治在治國理政中的積極作用。隨著“堅(jiān)持依法治國、依法執(zhí)政、依法行政共同推進(jìn),堅(jiān)持法治國家、法治政府、法治社會一體建設(shè)”以及全面推進(jìn)依法治國的提出和踐行,研究法治問題更應(yīng)該立足于我國當(dāng)下的法治建設(shè)困境,進(jìn)行對法治理論局限的深刻反省,進(jìn)而由外而內(nèi),回歸到對法治中國各個建設(shè)部分和構(gòu)成要素的內(nèi)在關(guān)聯(lián)以及本質(zhì)特征的深入探究,才能夠使法治在促進(jìn)“四個全面”實(shí)現(xiàn)的過程中更好地發(fā)揮作用。這種內(nèi)在關(guān)聯(lián)和本質(zhì)特征表現(xiàn)為法治的融貫性。法治融貫命題的提出既出于對我國當(dāng)下法治建設(shè)困境的現(xiàn)實(shí)反思,也有著堅(jiān)實(shí)的哲學(xué)理論基礎(chǔ)和法學(xué)理論基礎(chǔ),它指的是以一種整體性的思維方式審視法治的構(gòu)成要素以及各個建設(shè)層面,各構(gòu)成要素之間相互關(guān)聯(lián)并支撐、所有構(gòu)成要素融貫于各個建設(shè)過程、所有建設(shè)部分也并非孤立存在,只有它們彼此之間信念一致、相互支撐、漸進(jìn)平衡、協(xié)調(diào)共生才能夠真正實(shí)現(xiàn)法治中國的理想和目標(biāo)。對法治融貫命題進(jìn)行合理性的價值評價,會發(fā)現(xiàn)這一命題既具有符合法治發(fā)展必然規(guī)律的合規(guī)律性,也具有符合法治中國建設(shè)目標(biāo)的合目的性,同時具有符合我國法治建設(shè)基本價值追求的合價值性,因此具有應(yīng)然與實(shí)然、歷史與現(xiàn)實(shí)、規(guī)律與價值相統(tǒng)一的合理性,是法治融貫?zāi)軌虻靡詫?shí)現(xiàn)的價值基礎(chǔ)。法治融貫命題的落實(shí)突破了國家、政府、社會之間的對立和樊籬,通過社會——國家一體化、以法治政府建設(shè)為引領(lǐng)、與中國特色社會主義法治體系的其他要素有效互動最終實(shí)現(xiàn)融貫的法治中國建設(shè),實(shí)現(xiàn)法治社會與法治國家的互補(bǔ)互動互控。當(dāng)然,追求控制權(quán)力擴(kuò)張與防止權(quán)利濫用的統(tǒng)一、追求權(quán)力與權(quán)利的平衡互動關(guān)系導(dǎo)致法治融貫性的落實(shí)將面臨諸如社會自由與權(quán)利的生長空間不足、國家權(quán)力的角色定位與職能厘清偏差、社會權(quán)力缺乏有效機(jī)制倒逼公權(quán)力進(jìn)行變革等一些新的困境,要化解這些危機(jī)需要從重塑思想觀念的價值共識和合法性認(rèn)同、完善法治建設(shè)的各項(xiàng)體制機(jī)制兩方面雙管齊下,釋放社會活力、正視新興權(quán)利訴求、培育社會治理能力、構(gòu)建與社會發(fā)展現(xiàn)實(shí)相符的體制機(jī)制,才能夠?qū)崿F(xiàn)法治國家與法治社會的有效互動和對流循環(huán),落實(shí)法治融貫理論,完成法治中國建設(shè)。
[Abstract]:Since the convening of the fourth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee, "comprehensively promoting the rule of law" has planned a systematic development direction and goal for the construction of China under the rule of law, and "adhere to the road of socialist rule of law with Chinese characteristics." The construction of socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics highlights the positive role of the rule of law in governing the country. Along with "persist in governing the country according to law, ruling according to law, administering according to law together, insisting on the country ruled by law, the government ruled by law and the construction of society under the rule of law" and the proposal and practice of comprehensively promoting the rule of law, The study of the rule of law should be based on the predicament of the construction of the rule of law in our country, and carry out a deep reflection on the limitations of the theory of the rule of law, and then from the outside to the inside. Only by going back to the deep exploration of the internal relations and essential characteristics of the various construction parts and elements of the rule of law in China, can the rule of law play a better role in the process of promoting the realization of "four all-round". This inherent relation and essential characteristic is the fusion of the rule of law. The proposition of fusion of the rule of law is put forward not only out of the realistic reflection on the predicament of the construction of the rule of law in our country, but also because of the solid theoretical basis of philosophy and the theory of law. It means to examine the constituent elements of the rule of law and each construction level in a holistic way of thinking. The elements are interrelated and supported, and all the elements are integrated into each construction process. All the construction parts do not exist in isolation. Only if they share the same beliefs, support each other, gradually balance, coordinate and symbiosis can they truly realize the ideals and goals of China ruled by law. By evaluating the rationality of the rule of law proposition, it is found that this proposition is not only consistent with the law of the rule of law, but also conforms to the goal of the construction of China under the rule of law. At the same time, it has the rationality of conforming to the pursuit of the basic value of the construction of the rule of law in our country, so it has the rationality of the unity of history and reality, the unity of law and value, which is the value foundation on which the rule of law can be realized. The implementation of the consistent proposition of the rule of law broke through the opposition and barriers among the state, government and society. Through the integration of the society and the state, the construction of the government ruled by law was the guide. The effective interaction with other elements of the socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics finally realizes the harmonious construction of China under the rule of law and the complementary interaction and mutual control between the society ruled by law and the country ruled by law. Of course, the pursuit of the unity of controlling the expansion of power and preventing the abuse of power, and the pursuit of a balanced and interactive relationship between power and rights will lead to the implementation of the consistent nature of the rule of law, which will be faced with such lack of room for growth as social freedom and rights. Some new dilemmas, such as the role orientation and function of state power, the lack of effective mechanism of social power forcing the public power to change, and so on, need to be solved by remolding the value consensus and legitimacy identity of ideology. To improve the system and mechanism of the construction of the rule of law in both ways, to release social vitality, to face up to the demands of emerging rights, to cultivate the ability of social governance, and to build an institutional mechanism consistent with the reality of social development. Only then can we realize the effective interaction and convection cycle between the country ruled by law and the society ruled by law, implement the thaw theory of the rule of law, and complete the construction of China ruled by law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D920.0

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 蔡琳;;法律論證中的融貫論[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2006年02期

2 馬長山;;“法治中國”建設(shè)的問題與出路[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2014年03期

3 卓澤淵;論法治國家[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2002年05期

4 郭道暉;;法治國家與法治社會、公民社會[J];政法論叢;2007年05期

5 孫謙;;論依法治國與提高執(zhí)政能力[J];中國法學(xué);2005年04期

6 孫笑俠,胡瓷紅;法治發(fā)展的差異與中國式進(jìn)路[J];浙江社會科學(xué);2003年04期

7 姜明安;;論法治中國的全方位建設(shè)[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2013年04期

，

本文編號：2077649