本文選題：主權(quán) + 羅馬法��； 參考：《中央民族大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：本論文旨在研究羅馬法對博丹提出主權(quán)概念的影響,這種影響既包括羅馬法本身的文本,也包括博丹之前的法學(xué)家圍繞著羅馬法所展開的研究和評注。任何一個理論學(xué)說的提出都有其背后的思想傳統(tǒng)為鋪墊,在這方面博丹也不例外。本文考察了羅馬法在12世紀(jì)西歐中世紀(jì)復(fù)興之后,眾多羅馬法學(xué)家,包括注釋法學(xué)家和人文主義法學(xué)家,利用羅馬法的原理和概念,對自己的政治主張和現(xiàn)實(shí)政治所作的辯護(hù),正是在這多重的理論闡釋和相互感染中,孕育出來作為現(xiàn)代政治和國家核心的主權(quán)概念。 本論文主體結(jié)構(gòu)分為五章。第一章介紹了本論文的選題意義、研究動態(tài)和研究方法。第二章對論文的整體思路和選取的論題作了說明。第三章、第四章分別介紹了注釋法學(xué)派(包括后注釋法學(xué)派)和人文主義法學(xué)派對于羅馬法的相關(guān)概念的研究成果,這種研究一方面加深了人們對羅馬法的研究和認(rèn)識,另一方面也為博丹的理論創(chuàng)新積累了文獻(xiàn),提供了眾多素材。第三章開頭提出了所有問題的由來,即洛泰爾和阿佐對于merum imperium這一羅馬法概念的解釋的爭議,這個看似技術(shù)化的解釋問題,由于牽涉到最終權(quán)力的歸屬和劃分問題,成為以后諸多法學(xué)家爭相關(guān)注并予以解決的理論難題之一。注釋法學(xué)家,尤其是以巴爾多魯為代表的后注釋法學(xué)派,認(rèn)為merum imperium是可以在不同層級的官員之間分享的政治權(quán)力,這種解釋由于適應(yīng)了當(dāng)時歐洲的封建體制,從而在一段時期之內(nèi)成為通說,同時這種解釋也成為中世紀(jì)憲政主義的經(jīng)典闡釋。但隨著兩歐君主力量的逐漸增強(qiáng),權(quán)力分散的封建體制日益讓步于權(quán)力集中的近代國家體制,伴隨著這一現(xiàn)實(shí)過程的,是法學(xué)家對merum imperium含義注釋的相應(yīng)改變,這正是法國的人文主義法學(xué)派所而臨的問題。這種問題意識經(jīng)過諸如杜摩蘭這些法學(xué)家的轉(zhuǎn)承,最終為博丹所延續(xù)和繼承,而以其主權(quán)概念的豐滿和完善為終結(jié)。 本論文使用的是文本分析和歷史分析相結(jié)合的研究方法,但以文本分析為主,只在部分地方涉及文本背后的歷史社會背景。區(qū)別于以往歷史學(xué)和政治理論、政治哲學(xué)對主權(quán)概念的分析框架,本論文基于法律一政治的視角,通過分析眾多法學(xué)家的羅馬法注釋,力圖揭示法學(xué)家以及法律對于政治的塑造作用,從而一方面間接否定了以司法為思考中心的現(xiàn)代實(shí)證主義法學(xué),另一方面力圖突破以往的成文法憲政主義視角,探尋一國的“絕對憲法"之所在。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this thesis is to study the influence of Roman law on Bodan's concept of sovereignty, which includes not only the text of Roman law itself, but also the research and commentary on Roman law carried out by former jurists. Any theory is put forward with the ideological tradition behind it, and Bodan is no exception in this respect. After the revival of Roman law in the Middle Ages of Western Europe in the 12th century, this paper examines how many Roman jurists, including annotated jurists and humanist jurists, use the principles and concepts of Roman law to defend their own political claims and realistic politics. It is in this multiple theoretical interpretation and mutual infection that the concept of sovereignty as the core of modern politics and state is conceived. The main structure of this paper is divided into five chapters. The first chapter introduces the significance of this paper, research trends and research methods. The second chapter explains the whole idea and the selected topic of the thesis. Chapter three, chapter four introduces the research achievements of the annotated school (including the post-annotating school) and the humanist school on the related concepts of Roman law. On the one hand, this kind of research deepens the research and understanding of Roman law. On the other hand, it also accumulates the literature for Bodan's theoretical innovation and provides a lot of materials. The third chapter begins with the origin of all the problems, namely, the controversy between Lothell and Azo over the interpretation of the Roman law concept of merum imperium, a seemingly technical interpretation problem, which involves the attribution and division of the ultimate power. It has become one of the theoretical problems that many jurists pay close attention to and solve. The annotated jurists, especially the post-annotation school represented by Baldoru, thought that merum imperium was a political power that could be shared among officials at different levels, an explanation adapted to the feudal system in Europe at that time. Thus it became a general theory in a period of time, and it also became a classical interpretation of medieval constitutionalism. However, with the gradual strengthening of the powers of the monarchs of the two Europe, the decentralized feudal system gradually gave way to the modern state system of centralized power, which was accompanied by a corresponding change in the interpretation of the meaning of merum imperium by jurists. This is precisely the French humanist legal school and the problem. This kind of problem consciousness was transferred by jurists such as Dumoran, and eventually continued and inherited by Bodan, and ended with the fullness and perfection of his concept of sovereignty. This thesis uses the research method of combining text analysis and historical analysis, but mainly on text analysis, only involves the historical and social background behind the text in some places. Different from the historical and political theories and the analytical framework of political philosophy to the concept of sovereignty, this paper is based on the perspective of law and politics, through the analysis of many jurists' Roman law annotations. It tries to reveal the role of jurists and law in shaping politics, thus indirectly denying the modern positivism law centered on judicature on the one hand, and trying to break through the perspective of constitutional constitutionalism in the past on the other hand. Find out where the absolute Constitution of a country lies.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中央民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D904.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 強(qiáng)世功;;中國憲法中的不成文憲法——理解中國憲法的新視角[J];開放時代;2009年12期

，

本文編號：2074374