本文選題：工傷賠償 + 人身?yè)p害賠償　； 參考：《湖南大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：吳運(yùn)升、康響良兩原告1988年2月28日在譚家銻礦從事掘進(jìn)工作被炸傷,2007年2月7日原告以勞動(dòng)爭(zhēng)議(工傷賠償)糾紛為由,向冷水江市人民法院提起訴訟,要求被告支付拖欠的工資、傷殘賠償金、精神損害賠償金50余萬(wàn)元。2008年1月10日,冷水江市人民法院作出民事判決：駁回兩原告賠償訴訟請(qǐng)求。判決書(shū)發(fā)生法律效力后,吳運(yùn)升、康響良以不服判決為由向檢察機(jī)關(guān)申訴,婁底市中級(jí)人民法院決定將該案提審,后裁定撤銷(xiāo)一審生效判決；發(fā)回重審。冷水江法院在重審該案時(shí),將該案分成勞務(wù)合同糾紛及人身?yè)p害賠償中特殊類(lèi)別——雇員受害賠償糾紛兩案分別審理。重審一審判決被告賠償原告吳運(yùn)升殘疾賠償金、護(hù)理費(fèi)、鑒定費(fèi)、被撫養(yǎng)人生活費(fèi)93225元,賠償原告康響良?xì)埣操r償金、鑒定費(fèi)23308元；此案例前后兩次審理的結(jié)果,產(chǎn)生了鮮明的對(duì)比,原審中原告沒(méi)有得到一分錢(qián)的賠償,在再審程序中,原告變更案由和訴訟請(qǐng)求,得到了10萬(wàn)余元的補(bǔ)償,原審和重審結(jié)果相差巨大。 本案例反映出工傷賠償與人身?yè)p害賠償競(jìng)合、訴訟時(shí)效是否過(guò)期、賠償內(nèi)容和模式等方面的問(wèn)題,工傷賠償與人身?yè)p害賠償是有區(qū)別的,當(dāng)前理論界處理競(jìng)合有不同模式,司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)于競(jìng)合亦有不同的處理方法,其根本原因在于工傷賠償與人身?yè)p害賠償競(jìng)合相關(guān)立法缺失,因此,必須完善立法,以協(xié)調(diào)社會(huì)保障制度與民事賠償制度,使受害人的權(quán)利真正得到保護(hù)。
[Abstract]:Wu Yunsheng, Kang Xiangliang, two plaintiffs, were injured in the excavation work of Tan Jia antimony Mine on February 28, 1988. On February 7, 2007, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit with the people's Court of Lengshuijiang City on the grounds of labor dispute (industrial injury compensation) dispute. On January 10, 2008, the people's Court of Lengshuijiang City made a civil judgment: to reject the two plaintiffs' claims for compensation. After the legal effect of the judgment, Wu Yunsheng and Kang Xiangliang appealed to the procuratorial organs on the grounds of disagreeing with the judgment. The Loudi Intermediate people's Court decided to arraigne the case, and then ruled that the effective judgment of the first instance should be revoked; When the court of Lengshuijiang retried the case, it was divided into two cases: the dispute of labor contract and the dispute of compensation for personal injury. The defendant was awarded compensation for the plaintiff Wu Yunsheng's disability compensation, nursing fee, appraisal fee, dependant's living expenses of 93225 yuan, and compensation for the plaintiff Kang Xiangliang's disability compensation of 23308 yuan. The result of the two trials before and after this case, In sharp contrast, the plaintiff did not receive a penny of compensation in the original trial. In the retrial procedure, the plaintiff changed the cause of the case and the suit request and received more than 100000 yuan of compensation. The difference between the original trial and the retrial result is huge. This case reflects that the compensation for injury at work and the compensation for personal injury are competing, whether the limitation of action is expired, the content and mode of compensation for compensation, and so on, are different from the compensation for personal injury. At present, there are different modes of handling competition and cooperation in the theoretical circle, and there are different ways of dealing with competition and cooperation in judicial practice. The fundamental reason lies in the lack of legislation related to the competition of compensation for injury at work and compensation for personal injury. Therefore, it is necessary to perfect the legislation. In order to coordinate the social security system with the civil compensation system, the victims' rights can be really protected.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D920.5;D922.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄧秋柳;劉海珍;;完善我國(guó)農(nóng)民工工傷保險(xiǎn)制度的思考[J];財(cái)經(jīng)理論與實(shí)踐;2008年05期

2 楊波;;工傷保險(xiǎn)與工傷預(yù)防相結(jié)合初探[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)理人;2006年13期

3 陳現(xiàn)杰;《最高人民法院關(guān)于審理人身?yè)p害賠償案件適用法律若干問(wèn)題的解釋》的若干理論與實(shí)務(wù)問(wèn)題解析[J];法律適用;2004年02期

4 石婷婷;;論工傷保險(xiǎn)賠償與侵權(quán)賠償?shù)母?jìng)合[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年18期

5 張照東;;工傷案件賠償請(qǐng)求權(quán)競(jìng)合問(wèn)題研究[J];河北法學(xué);2007年03期

6 黃維娜;段海風(fēng);胡輝;;試論現(xiàn)行立法中人身?yè)p害賠償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的缺陷及其完善[J];湖北經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年02期

7 余桔云;匡小平;;我國(guó)工傷保險(xiǎn)預(yù)防機(jī)制的研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問(wèn)題探索;2007年12期

8 喻承躍;;工傷賠償與民事侵權(quán)賠償?shù)年P(guān)系——從司法審判的角度審視[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年04期

9 黃維娜;胡輝;;侵權(quán)行為法中人身?yè)p害賠償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)問(wèn)題初探[J];理論觀察;2008年01期

10 林嘉;馬特;;工傷賠償請(qǐng)求權(quán)競(jìng)合問(wèn)題研究[J];法學(xué)論壇;2008年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1994314