發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-31 22:08

  本文選題：唐律 + 別籍異財(cái)�。� 參考：《安徽大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：唐朝處于中國封建社會(huì)發(fā)展的頂峰,其完備而先進(jìn)的法律是宋元明清學(xué)習(xí)借鑒的主要依據(jù),也是日本等國家遠(yuǎn)渡重洋來華取經(jīng)的動(dòng)力,更是今天我們研究中國古代法律的藍(lán)本和傳承中華民族璀璨文化的驕傲。《唐律》為現(xiàn)今尚存于中國最完善之一部法典,其內(nèi)容上承戰(zhàn)國《法經(jīng)》以降諸律,下啟宋元明清之制,儼然為中華固有法系之代表作。且流風(fēng)所及,影響周邊東亞諸國法制之發(fā)展。縱觀中國傳統(tǒng)法律,與家庭有關(guān)之條文,多半于唐朝完成法制化之歷程,且為后世封建社會(huì)奠定基礎(chǔ)。 禁止別籍異財(cái)是中國封建社會(huì)統(tǒng)治者規(guī)范家族財(cái)產(chǎn)、維護(hù)家族制度、實(shí)現(xiàn)國家對(duì)家族控制的一項(xiàng)重要舉措。在唐朝之前,立法中并未出現(xiàn)類似規(guī)定,與之相應(yīng)的表述是秦朝的“異子之科”,即秦朝通過“商鞅變法”在全國強(qiáng)制推行父子分異,迫使家庭成年之子與父親分家。直至曹魏時(shí)期,正式從法律上廢除“異子之科”。但是,從國家立法的層面直接禁止別籍異財(cái)?shù)囊?guī)定首創(chuàng)于唐朝。唐高宗永徽年間,正式頒布《唐律》,嚴(yán)禁親在別籍異財(cái)之家庭情形,并對(duì)違犯之人重刑科罪。 本文選取了唐朝這一典型封建王朝,以別籍異財(cái)為主題,圍繞《唐律疏議·戶婚律》之“子孫別籍異財(cái)條”、“居父母喪生子條”以及《唐律疏議·名例律》之“十惡”條、“免所居官條”等相關(guān)律文,在挖掘史料的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合當(dāng)代刑法犯罪構(gòu)成理論對(duì)別籍異財(cái)罪進(jìn)行分析和探討。家是社會(huì)的細(xì)胞,是國家的基本組成單元,家庭和睦是社會(huì)和諧的應(yīng)有之義,今日之家庭觀念與封建社會(huì)的家存在天壤之別,但家的背后所折射的文化內(nèi)涵卻是相通的,希望通過本文的撰寫,能對(duì)當(dāng)今和諧社會(huì)之建構(gòu)有所啟發(fā)。
[Abstract]:The Tang Dynasty was at the pinnacle of the development of China's feudal society. Its complete and advanced laws were the main basis for learning and learning from the Song, Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties, and were also the driving force for Japan and other countries to travel across the oceans to learn from China. It is also the pride of our study of the blueprint of ancient Chinese law and the inheritance of the resplendent culture of the Chinese nation today. "Tang Law" is one of the most perfect codes that still exist in China today. Its content inherits the laws of the warring States and the Ming and Qing dynasties, and begins with the system of Song, Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties. It is the representative work of the Chinese legal system. And the current wind affects the development of the legal system in the surrounding East Asian countries. Throughout the Chinese traditional law, most of the articles related to the family were completed in the Tang Dynasty, and laid the foundation for later feudal society. It is an important measure for the rulers of Chinese feudal society to regulate the family property, maintain the family system and realize the state control over the family. Prior to the Tang Dynasty, there were no similar provisions in the legislation, and the corresponding expression was the "branch of the different sons" of the Qin Dynasty, that is, the Qin Dynasty enforced the separation of father and son in the whole country through the "Shang Yang Reform", forcing the adult son of the family to separate his family from his father. Until the period of the Cao Wei Dynasty, the law was formally abolished. However, from the level of national legislation, the direct prohibition of exotic wealth was first established in the Tang Dynasty. Tang Gao Zong Yonghui years, officially promulgated "Tang Law", prohibited relatives in the family situation, and the violator of heavy punishment. This paper selects the typical feudal dynasty of the Tang Dynasty, taking the special books and other wealth as the theme, and revolves around the "different wealth rules of the descendants", the "rules for the loss of their parents' lives", and the "ten evil" articles for the "Tang Law of sparing the Law on Hukou Marriage", "the rules for the death of their parents", and the "Ten evils" for "the laws of the Tang Dynasty." On the basis of excavating historical data and combining with the theory of criminal constitution of contemporary criminal law, this paper analyzes and probes into the crime of different kinds of property. Home is the cell of the society and the basic unit of the country. Family harmony is the proper meaning of social harmony. There is a great difference between the family concept today and the home of the feudal society, but the cultural connotations behind it are similar. Hope through the writing of this article, can inspire the construction of a harmonious society today.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D929

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 楊威;傳統(tǒng)家庭倫理的近代轉(zhuǎn)型及其動(dòng)因[J];理論探討;2005年06期

2 張國剛;唐代家庭形態(tài)的復(fù)合型特征[J];歷史研究;2005年04期

3 邢鐵;唐代的遺囑繼產(chǎn)問題[J];人文雜志;1994年05期

4 雷巧玲;唐人的居住方式與孝悌之道[J];陜西師大學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1993年03期

5 馬建興,鄭定;論中國古代守喪制度的法律化[J];思想戰(zhàn)線;2005年01期

6 孫翊剛;;中國古代稅收思想中的以人為本[J];中國稅務(wù);2008年07期

7 包偉民;尹成波;;宋代“別籍異財(cái)法”的演變及其原因闡析[J];浙江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年03期

8 麻國慶;分家:分中有繼也有合——中國分家制度研究[J];中國社會(huì)科學(xué);1999年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 竇亞菲;論家長(zhǎng)權(quán)力在《唐律疏議》中的體現(xiàn)[D];蘭州大學(xué);2010年

2 徐爽;別籍異財(cái)罪研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1961464