本文選題：規(guī)則 + 法治��； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：20世紀(jì)初以來,社會學(xué)法學(xué)、現(xiàn)實(shí)主義法學(xué)以及批判法學(xué)派,從法律規(guī)則的不足入手對法律規(guī)則進(jìn)行了猛烈地批判,法律規(guī)則作為法學(xué)的核心范疇的地位受到了沖擊,更進(jìn)一步法律的客觀性和確定性也飽受質(zhì)疑。行動中的法律,法官造法,無法司法等法律思潮,從對規(guī)則的批判開始,不斷地瓦解著法治的理論和制度基礎(chǔ)。法治的證成缺少了理論支點(diǎn),法治面臨無法實(shí)現(xiàn)的危險。尤其是,我國法治建設(shè)剛剛起步,法治賴以建立的基礎(chǔ)卻在慢慢瓦解。這就好比,一座大廈剛剛開始建設(shè),卻突然發(fā)現(xiàn)地基被人破壞了。因此,有必要喚起人們對‘規(guī)則’的尊重,認(rèn)真的對待規(guī)則,以維護(hù)法治的基石。筆者認(rèn)為在當(dāng)下中國法治建設(shè)過程中應(yīng)該強(qiáng)調(diào)規(guī)則的重要性,要‘認(rèn)真對待規(guī)則’,奉行司法克制主義,合理解釋和適用法律,使已經(jīng)制定的規(guī)則能夠得到遵守和執(zhí)行,這對于指導(dǎo)司法實(shí)踐,樹立法律至上的觀念,確立法律權(quán)威,從而形成現(xiàn)代化法治理念具有重要意義。 本文包括引言和正文兩部分。引言主要闡述本文的選題意義及研究現(xiàn)狀綜述。正文部分包括四章內(nèi)容。第一章,闡述我們?yōu)槭裁匆J(rèn)真對待規(guī)則’。第一節(jié),敘述規(guī)則的含義及其特征,意在說明本文語境所指規(guī)則的含義；第二節(jié),闡述規(guī)則作為法律的核心要素的地位,說明規(guī)則對于法律的重要性；第三節(jié),闡述規(guī)則對司法的規(guī)范作用；第四節(jié),說明規(guī)則及其確定性是法治證成的基礎(chǔ),沒有規(guī)則便沒有法治的理想。第二章,從宏觀、中觀、微觀三個層面來闡釋‘認(rèn)真的對待規(guī)則’的內(nèi)在要求。第一節(jié),‘認(rèn)真對待規(guī)則‘要求法律至上的法治理念；第二節(jié),‘認(rèn)真對待規(guī)則’要求克制的司法意識形態(tài)；第三節(jié),‘認(rèn)真對待規(guī)則’要求尊重規(guī)則的司法制度；第四節(jié),‘認(rèn)真對待規(guī)則’要求規(guī)范的選擇和適用司法方法。第三章,如何實(shí)現(xiàn)‘認(rèn)真對待規(guī)則’。第一節(jié),首先要求奉行‘認(rèn)真對待規(guī)則’的法治理念；第二節(jié),法律實(shí)施的過程也要‘認(rèn)真對待規(guī)則’,其又包括制度、主體、程序和方法等方面；第三節(jié),司法的結(jié)果也要滿足‘認(rèn)真對待規(guī)則’的要求。第四章,‘認(rèn)真對待規(guī)則’的法治意義。第一節(jié),‘認(rèn)真對待規(guī)則’體現(xiàn)法治的制度要素；第二節(jié),‘認(rèn)真對待規(guī)則’要求制度法治先行；第三節(jié),‘認(rèn)真對待規(guī)則’是法治初級階段的必然要求。
[Abstract]:Since the beginning of the 20th century, the sociological jurisprudence, realistic jurisprudence and critical law schools have criticized the legal rules violently from the deficiency of the legal rules, and the status of the legal rules as the core category of the jurisprudence has been challenged. Further legal objectivity and certainty have also been questioned. The law in action, the law made by the judge, the legal trend of thought such as the impossibility of judicature, from the critique of the rule of law, constantly disintegrate the theory and the system foundation of the rule of law. The evidence of the rule of law lacks the theoretical fulcrum, and the rule of law is in danger of being impossible to realize. In particular, the construction of rule of law in China has just started, but the foundation on which the rule of law is built is slowly disintegrating. It was like a building that had just begun construction only to discover that the foundation had been destroyed. Therefore, it is necessary to arouse respect for the rules and take them seriously in order to maintain the cornerstone of the rule of law. The author thinks that the importance of rules should be emphasized in the process of building the rule of law in China. We should take rules seriously, pursue judicial restraint, rationally interpret and apply the law, and make the rules that have been made possible to be observed and enforced. It is of great significance to guide judicial practice, establish the concept of law first, establish legal authority and form the modern concept of rule of law. This paper includes two parts: introduction and text. The introduction mainly describes the significance of this topic and the status quo of the review. The text includes four chapters. The first chapter explains why we should take rules seriously. Section I, the meaning and characteristics of the rules, is intended to explain the meaning of the rules referred to in the context of this article; section II, the status of rules as the core element of law, the importance of rules to the law; section III, The fourth section explains that the rule and its certainty are the basis of the rule of law, and that there is no rule of law without the ideal of the rule of law. The second chapter, from the macro-level, meso-level and micro-level to explain the internal requirements of "take rules seriously". Section I, "take rules seriously", calls for the rule of law to prevail; section II, "take rules seriously", a judicial ideology that requires restraint; section III, "take rules seriously", a system of justice that requires respect for rules; and section IV, 'take rules seriously' requires the choice of norms and the application of judicial methods. The third chapter, how to realize 'take rules seriously. Section I, first of all, requires the pursuit of the concept of "taking rules seriously"; section II, the process of law enforcement, which includes institutional, subject, procedural and methodological aspects; and section III, "taking rules seriously". The outcome of the administration of justice should also meet the requirements of 'take the rules seriously'. Chapter four discusses the significance of rule of law by taking rules seriously. The first section "take rules seriously" reflects the institutional elements of the rule of law; the second section "taking rules seriously" requires the system to rule by law first; the third section "taking rules seriously" is the inevitable requirement of the primary stage of rule of law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D90

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳金釗;;反對解釋的場景及主體[J];北方法學(xué);2007年01期

2 嚴(yán)存生;法的合法性問題研究[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年03期

3 趙承壽;論司法裁判的合法性[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年03期

4 陳金釗;;法治反對解釋的原則[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報);2007年03期

5 楊建軍;;“司法能動”在中國的展開[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報);2010年01期

6 王群;王卉;;法官如何思考——法官意識形態(tài)的選擇困境[J];大慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年05期

7 陳金釗;;拯救客觀性——關(guān)于法治方法的理論探索之一[J];法律方法;2002年00期

8 張偉強(qiáng);;審判的法律效果與社會效果——法官應(yīng)該追求什么[J];法律方法;2009年00期

9 秦強(qiáng);制度法治與觀念法治——論法治的結(jié)構(gòu)及其意義[J];廣東青年干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年03期

10 謝暉;論法律規(guī)則[J];廣東社會科學(xué);2005年02期

，

本文編號：1932694