本文選題：P2P + 版權(quán)�。� 參考：《中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：P2P文件共享技術(shù)的出現(xiàn)，給世界各國(guó)的版權(quán)保護(hù)提出了前所未有的挑戰(zhàn)。在這場(chǎng)科技與法律的較量過(guò)程中，法律往往顯得落后一步。然而，最終的結(jié)果也尚未卜。由于美國(guó)對(duì)于網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下的私人復(fù)制以及版權(quán)間接侵權(quán)采用的是司法救濟(jì)的手段，本文主要以美國(guó)的P2P版權(quán)糾紛系列案為核心進(jìn)行展開。 本文第一章節(jié)系統(tǒng)地介紹P2P了文件共享的技術(shù)、工作原理及其類型，目的在于發(fā)現(xiàn)P2P技術(shù)與版權(quán)法沖突的根本原因。其中，根據(jù)開發(fā)者或運(yùn)營(yíng)者對(duì)P2P共享軟件的控制能力強(qiáng)弱，，依次可以分為混合分布式架構(gòu)、半中心化架構(gòu)和純分布式架構(gòu)。這三種類型的P2P對(duì)于各自開發(fā)者或運(yùn)營(yíng)者的版權(quán)責(zé)任有著至關(guān)重要的作用，決定了作品在P2P軟件上的上傳、服務(wù)器存儲(chǔ)（或者緩存）、下載的應(yīng)有（而實(shí)際未進(jìn)行的）使用許可流程以及運(yùn)營(yíng)者的法律地位。 本文第二部分主要分析了P2P文件共享軟件版權(quán)侵權(quán)理論及其典型案例。首當(dāng)其沖的是Sony案，盡管該案并非直接針對(duì)P2P技術(shù)，但是該案的“實(shí)質(zhì)非侵權(quán)用途”理論對(duì)于任何涉及版權(quán)的技術(shù)開發(fā)者或者運(yùn)營(yíng)者的免責(zé)事由有著普適性的作用。其次是Napster案，這是針對(duì)P2P的第一案，美國(guó)法官首次用判例法中有關(guān)幫助侵權(quán)和替代侵權(quán)的理論艱難地抵抗住P2P技術(shù)的第一次沖擊。緊隨其后的是Grokster案，美國(guó)法官大膽突破，提出引誘侵權(quán)理論試圖“后發(fā)制人”。 本文第三部分是文章重點(diǎn)，主要介紹了P2P文件共享軟件版權(quán)問(wèn)題的最新進(jìn)展。在引誘侵權(quán)這種消極方式打擊P2P所涉及的版權(quán)侵權(quán)仍不充分時(shí)，美國(guó)法官在LimeWire中明確指出其運(yùn)營(yíng)商應(yīng)當(dāng)采取而未采取當(dāng)時(shí)市面可行的過(guò)濾措施是其承擔(dān)引誘侵權(quán)責(zé)任的重要原因。然而，技術(shù)仍在發(fā)展，美國(guó)已經(jīng)意識(shí)到僅僅打擊P2P運(yùn)營(yíng)者還不足夠，開始把矛頭轉(zhuǎn)向使用者。另外，美國(guó)國(guó)會(huì)還認(rèn)為司法手段并不足以有效打擊P2P的版權(quán)侵權(quán)問(wèn)題，試圖從多方面立法解決：首先是提出規(guī)范P2P軟件運(yùn)營(yíng)者和版權(quán)內(nèi)容發(fā)布者行為的法案，其次是提出限制政府職員使用P2P軟件，再者是提出部分作品的網(wǎng)上使用應(yīng)適用法定補(bǔ)償金制度的法案。與此同時(shí)，本文還發(fā)現(xiàn)，澳大利亞版權(quán)人在iiNet案中就P2P侵權(quán)的矛頭，已經(jīng)直指網(wǎng)絡(luò)接入服務(wù)提供商。該案對(duì)于同為英美法系的美國(guó)而言，具有重要的意義——美國(guó)的版權(quán)人是否也會(huì)把P2P侵權(quán)的矛頭指向網(wǎng)絡(luò)接入服務(wù)提供商？ 文章結(jié)尾部分主要總結(jié)了美國(guó)采用司法手段解決P2P版權(quán)侵權(quán)的做法及其優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)，然后在澳大利亞的相關(guān)案例以及美國(guó)的相關(guān)立法之上，就不斷發(fā)展的P2P技術(shù)，展望未來(lái)的版權(quán)法發(fā)展方向。
[Abstract]:The emergence of P2P file-sharing technology has brought unprecedented challenges to copyright protection all over the world. In this battle between technology and law, the law often appears a step behind. The final outcome, however, is uncertain. Since the United States uses judicial remedies for private copying and indirect copyright infringement under the network environment, this paper focuses on the P2P copyright disputes series in the United States. The first chapter of this paper systematically introduces the P2P file sharing technology, working principle and types, the purpose is to find out the root cause of the conflict between P2P technology and copyright law. According to the ability of developers or operators to control P2P sharing software, it can be divided into mixed distributed architecture, semi-centralized architecture and pure distributed architecture in turn. These three types of P2P play an important role in the copyright liability of their developers or operators, which determines the upload of works on P2P software. The server stores (or caches), the download should (but actually not be) the license process and the legal status of the operator. The second part of this paper mainly analyzes the P2P file-sharing software copyright infringement theory and typical cases. The Sony case, which is not directly targeted at P2P technology, has a universal effect on any technology developer or operator involved in copyright, although it is not directly targeted at P2P technology, but the theory of "material non-infringing uses" has a universal effect on any technology developer or operator involved in copyright. Second is the Napster case, which is the first case against P2P. For the first time, American judges have used the theory of helping and replacing tort to resist the first impact of P2P technology. Closely followed by the Grokster case, American judges boldly broke through, putting forward the theory of inducement infringement in an attempt to "attack later." The third part of this paper is the focus of the article, mainly introduces the P2P file-sharing software copyright issues of the latest progress. At a time when the passive way of luring infringement is still insufficient to crack down on the copyright infringement involved in P2P, In the LimeWire, the American judge clearly pointed out that its operators should take but not take the filtering measures that were feasible at that time, which is the important reason why they bear the liability to seduce the infringement. However, technology is still evolving, and the United States has realized that it is not enough to crack down on P2P operators and is turning its finger on users. In addition, the United States Congress also considers that judicial means are not sufficient to effectively combat copyright infringement in P2P, and tries to solve the problem from various aspects of legislation: first, it proposes a bill to regulate the behavior of P2P software operators and copyright publishers. Secondly, it proposes to restrict the use of P2P software by government employees, and also proposes that the statutory compensation system should be applied to the online use of some works. At the same time, this paper also found that Australian copyright owners in the iiNet case against P2P infringement, has directly targeted network access service providers. This case is of great significance to the United States, which is also a common law system. Will the copyright owners in the United States also point the finger at the network access service providers? At the end of the article, the author summarizes the judicial approach to solve P2P copyright infringement in the United States and its advantages and disadvantages. Then, on the basis of the relevant cases in Australia and the relevant legislation in the United States, the P2P technology has been developing. Look forward to the future development of copyright law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D971.2;DD913;D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 王遷;“索尼案”二十年祭——回顧、反思與啟示[J];科技與法律;2004年04期

2 傅雷;;P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)探討[J];科技風(fēng);2008年23期

3 熊偉;謝冬青;焦炳旺;劉潔;;一種結(jié)構(gòu)化P2P協(xié)議中的自適應(yīng)負(fù)載均衡方法[J];軟件學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期

本文編號(hào)：1903551