本文選題：《歐洲憲法條約》 + 《里斯本條約》��； 參考：《南昌大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：《歐洲憲法條約》未能獲得通過,《里斯本條約》隨后取得的成功,使得憲法條約在今天的重要性和意義在大多數(shù)研究者心中有所下降。但必須注意的是,《里斯本條約》只是作為《歐洲憲法條約》的替代者和危機(jī)局面的拯救者出現(xiàn)的。在這個(gè)意義上說,《歐洲憲法條約》更為接近歐盟立法者的理想狀態(tài),而《里斯本條約》只是在現(xiàn)實(shí)政治壓力下的折衷。所以,比起《里斯本條約》,《歐洲憲法條約》的作用并不應(yīng)當(dāng)被過分低估,盡管《里斯本條約》取得了很多明顯的巨大成功。在本文中,作者將在歐洲一體化的歷史和現(xiàn)實(shí)背景中,將《歐洲憲法條約》和《里斯本條約》的努力作為一個(gè)完整的事件加以研究。 《里斯本條約》在歐盟機(jī)構(gòu)改革的成效遠(yuǎn)勝于其在象征意義上取得的作用。但《里斯本條約》的前身——《歐洲憲法條約》卻本應(yīng)完成大量的象征意義上的立法,用以培養(yǎng)歐洲公民的憲法愛國主義。歐洲集體認(rèn)同建設(shè)的缺失使得《里斯本條約》這一改革條約(《里斯本條約》原名)的改革是一個(gè)半途而廢的改革,最初的立法意圖并未實(shí)現(xiàn),在將來的歐盟立法中,培養(yǎng)憲法愛國主義和建立歐洲集體認(rèn)同的大量工作有待完成。一定程度上說,《歐洲憲法條約》為將來立法中完成憲法條約原定目標(biāo)提供了一個(gè)不算完美的范例。 綜上,《歐洲憲法條約》的研究并沒有過時(shí),這一研究對(duì)理解和預(yù)測歐盟和歐盟法的未來至關(guān)重要。本文第一部分對(duì)歐洲一體化歷史進(jìn)程進(jìn)行介紹；第二部分在分析《歐洲憲法條約》條文的基礎(chǔ)上探討其對(duì)于歐盟憲政的影響；第三部分分析《里斯本條約》之于憲法條約的繼承和倒退；最后一部分對(duì)兩個(gè)條約在憲政建設(shè)上的作用和意義進(jìn)行分析,結(jié)合憲法愛國主義理論對(duì)《歐洲憲法條約》這一模式在歐洲集體認(rèn)同構(gòu)建上的作用加以揭示。
[Abstract]:The failure of the European Constitutional Treaty and the subsequent success of the Lisbon Treaty have led to a decline in the importance and significance of the Constitutional Treaty in the minds of most researchers today. It must be noted, however, that the Lisbon Treaty only emerged as a substitute for the European Constitutional Treaty and a savior of crisis situations. In this sense, the European Constitutional Treaty is closer to the ideal state of EU lawmakers, while the Lisbon Treaty is only a compromise under realistic political pressure. So the role of the European Constitutional Treaty should not be overestimated compared to the Lisbon Treaty, which has had many notable successes. In this paper, the author will study the efforts of the European Constitutional Treaty and the Lisbon Treaty as a complete event in the historical and realistic background of European integration. The Lisbon treaty has done much better in EU institutional reform than it has done symbolically. But the predecessor of the Lisbon Treaty, the European Constitutional Treaty, was supposed to have completed a great deal of symbolic legislation to foster constitutional patriotism among European citizens. The lack of collective identity in Europe makes the reform of the Treaty of Lisbon (the original name of the Treaty of Lisbon) a half-way reform, but the original legislative intent was not realized, in future EU legislation. Much remains to be done to cultivate constitutional patriotism and build a European collective identity. To some extent, the European Constitutional Treaty provides an imperfect model for future legislation to achieve its original objectives. Overall, the study of the European Constitutional Treaty, which is crucial to understanding and predicting the future of EU and EU law, is not out of date. The first part of this paper introduces the historical process of European integration, the second part discusses its influence on the constitutionalism of the European Union on the basis of analyzing the articles of the European Constitutional Treaty. The third part analyzes the succession and retrogression of the Lisbon Treaty to the constitutional treaty, and the last part analyzes the role and significance of the two treaties in the constitutional construction. Combined with the theory of constitutional patriotism, the role of this model in the construction of European collective identity is revealed.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D95

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 楊成銘;;《歐盟憲法條約》對(duì)歐盟人權(quán)保護(hù)的影響[J];法學(xué)雜志;2006年01期

2 鄭賢君;;基本權(quán)利哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)的轉(zhuǎn)變——以社會(huì)中的人為基線的《歐盟憲法條約》之基本權(quán)利[J];長白學(xué)刊;2006年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1896787