本文選題：法律與文學(xué) + 相關(guān)性��； 參考：《中國政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：法律與文學(xué)運(yùn)動(dòng)作為一個(gè)“跨學(xué)科”研究,其理論基礎(chǔ)、理論構(gòu)成,乃至最終目的皆是為了闡明“法律”與“文學(xué)”這兩個(gè)貌似完全無關(guān),又似乎存在著千絲萬縷的聯(lián)系的學(xué)科之間,到底在何種程度上,何種意義上,具有哪些聯(lián)系。本文就是試圖從“相關(guān)性”的角度,對(duì)“法律與文學(xué)”運(yùn)動(dòng)進(jìn)行檢視。通過這場學(xué)術(shù)運(yùn)動(dòng)既有的學(xué)術(shù)史的梳理及學(xué)術(shù)框架的歸納,比較清晰地勾勒出這一學(xué)術(shù)運(yùn)動(dòng)在“相關(guān)性”層面上已有的研究成果及現(xiàn)有研究中所存在的問題。 與此同時(shí),本文著重關(guān)注了當(dāng)代研究者在“相關(guān)性”角度上提出的,可能對(duì)這一學(xué)術(shù)運(yùn)動(dòng)的理論基礎(chǔ)產(chǎn)生動(dòng)搖的重要批評(píng),同時(shí)從理論和實(shí)踐的不同角度對(duì)上述批評(píng)進(jìn)行了評(píng)論和回應(yīng)。 最后,本文試圖通過對(duì)“法律與文學(xué)”研究中對(duì)于法律與文學(xué)相關(guān)性問題的新理論的探討,提出筆者所認(rèn)為的一條可行的“法律與文學(xué)”研究路徑,即發(fā)生在具體司法過程中的“法律”與“文學(xué)”的關(guān)聯(lián),并且研究其對(duì)于具體司法的影響。筆者通過2001年著名的“張學(xué)英訴蔣倫芳遺囑繼承案”對(duì)筆者上述的理論框架進(jìn)行了具體案例文本上的實(shí)踐。 本文試圖在深刻理解、梳理前人研究成果,并且在對(duì)于這些成果的檢視、論辯的基礎(chǔ)上,為這一學(xué)術(shù)運(yùn)動(dòng)在“確定性”方面提供些許新的思路。
[Abstract]:As a "interdisciplinary" study, the theoretical foundation, the Theoretical Constitution and the ultimate aim of the movement of law and literature are to elucidate the two seemingly completely irrelevant and seemingly inextricable links between the "law" and "Literature". To what extent, in what sense, and in relation to it, what is the relationship between them. It is an attempt to examine the movement of "law and literature" from the angle of "relevance". Through the combing of the academic history of this academic movement and the induction of the academic framework, the existing research achievements and existing problems in the "relevance" level of this academic movement are clearly outlined.
At the same time, this paper focuses on the "relevance" of contemporary researchers, which may be critical to the theoretical basis of this academic movement, and reviews and responds to the above criticism from different angles of theory and practice.
Finally, this paper attempts to propose a feasible path for the study of "law and literature", that is, the relevance of "law" and "Literature" in the specific judicial process, and to study the specific judicature through the study of the new theory of law and literature on the relevance of law and literature in the study of law and literature. Influenced by the famous "Zhang Xueying v. Jiang Lunfang's will succession" in 2001, the author carried out a concrete case text practice on the author's theoretical framework.
This article attempts to understand the achievements of previous studies in a profound understanding and to provide some new ideas for this academic movement in the "certainty" on the basis of the examination and debate of these achievements.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D90-05

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 鄭戈;;法學(xué)是一門社會(huì)科學(xué)嗎?——試論“法律科學(xué)”的屬性及其研究方法[J];北大法律評(píng)論;1998年01期

2 馮象;;法律與文學(xué)(《木腿正義:法律與文學(xué)論集》代序)[J];北大法律評(píng)論;1999年02期

3 沈明;;法律與文學(xué):可能性及其限度[J];中外法學(xué);2006年03期

4 楊昂;;當(dāng)代法律思想史上的潛流——論中國后現(xiàn)代法學(xué)的興起[J];中山大學(xué)研究生學(xué)刊(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年01期

5 信春鷹;后現(xiàn)代法學(xué):為法治探索未來[J];中國社會(huì)科學(xué);2000年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉星顯;“法律與文學(xué)”的后現(xiàn)代之維[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1864161