本文選題：法律規(guī)則 + 司法解釋　； 參考：《海南大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：英國(guó)人哈特(Herbert Lionel Adolphus Hart,1907年-1992年),是20世紀(jì)著名的法學(xué)家之一,他是新分析實(shí)證主義法學(xué)的開創(chuàng)者。1961年,哈特發(fā)表了著名的《法律的概念》一書,該書被視作是新分析實(shí)證主義法學(xué)產(chǎn)生的標(biāo)志哈特在該書中批判性地繼承了奧斯丁的“法律命令說(shuō)”,成功地引入日常語(yǔ)言哲學(xué),從一個(gè)全新的角度對(duì)法律的“概念”進(jìn)行闡述和梳理,建立了哈特式的法律規(guī)則體系。本文在此基礎(chǔ)上引入了語(yǔ)言學(xué)理論,從語(yǔ)言表達(dá)的局限性進(jìn)一步闡述哈特司法解釋理論的淵源�；谡Z(yǔ)言本身固有的模糊性,法律規(guī)則具有“開放結(jié)構(gòu)”,即規(guī)則都有模糊的邊緣,由此導(dǎo)致了提供法律標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的承認(rèn)規(guī)則的不確定性。司法理論中,對(duì)于規(guī)則確定性的問(wèn)題,分為形式主義法學(xué)和規(guī)則懷疑論兩種不同的理論,哈特批判了形式主義法學(xué)和規(guī)則懷疑論,并且針對(duì)這兩種理論,分別提出了“空缺結(jié)構(gòu)”與“核心地帶”的概念,闡述了自己的司法解釋理論。哈特的司法解釋理論激發(fā)了不同哲學(xué)背景的法律理論之間的論戰(zhàn),其中最有力的挑戰(zhàn)者就是德沃金。德沃金作為新時(shí)期的自然法學(xué)派的領(lǐng)軍人物,對(duì)哈特的理論進(jìn)行了批判,哈特在回應(yīng)德沃金的同時(shí)豐富完善了他的司法解釋理論,并對(duì)西方法學(xué)產(chǎn)生了廣泛的影響。我國(guó)對(duì)哈特思想的研究起步得比較晚,目前國(guó)內(nèi)對(duì)哈特思想的研究主要集中在“法律規(guī)則說(shuō)”,對(duì)其司法解釋理論的研究可謂鳳毛麟角,因此本文選取哈特思想中的司法解釋理論,從其淵源、內(nèi)容及對(duì)西方法學(xué)的影響三方面進(jìn)行論證,以期能對(duì)哈特司法解釋理論的研究盡一份綿薄之力。在我國(guó)的法治建設(shè)中,法律的確定性是基礎(chǔ),它要求法律語(yǔ)言必須精確嚴(yán)密,由于法律實(shí)踐的復(fù)雜,法律語(yǔ)言的模糊性難以避免。研究哈特的司法解釋理論,對(duì)實(shí)現(xiàn)法律語(yǔ)言的精確性,捍衛(wèi)法律的確定性有一定的啟示意義。
[Abstract]:Harbert Lionel Adolphus Hart, an Englishman from 1907 to 1992, was one of the most famous jurists of the 20th century. He was the pioneer of the new analytical positivism law. In 1961, Hart published the famous concept of Law. The book is regarded as a symbol of the emergence of New Analytical positivism in which Hart critically inherits Austen's "legal commandment" and successfully introduces the philosophy of everyday language. This paper expounds and combs the concept of law from a new angle, and establishes Hart's system of legal rules. On this basis, this paper introduces linguistic theory, and further expounds the origin of Hart's theory of judicial interpretation from the limitation of language expression. Due to the inherent fuzziness of language, legal rules have an "open structure", that is, rules have fuzzy edges, which leads to the uncertainty of recognition rules that provide legal standards. In judicial theory, there are two different theories about the certainty of rules: formalism jurisprudence and rule scepticism. Hart criticizes formalism law and rule scepticism, and aiming at these two theories, The concepts of "vacancy structure" and "core zone" are put forward, and their own theory of judicial interpretation is expounded. Hart's theory of judicial interpretation inspires controversy between legal theories with different philosophical backgrounds, among which Dworkin is the most powerful challenger. Dworkin, as the leader of the natural law school in the new era, criticized Hart's theory. Hart responded to Dworkin by enriching and perfecting his theory of judicial interpretation and exerting a wide influence on western jurisprudence. The research on Hart's thought in our country started relatively late. At present, the research on Hart's thought is mainly focused on the theory of legal rules, and the research on its theory of judicial interpretation is rare. Therefore, this article selects the judicial interpretation theory of Hart's thought, from its origin, the content and the influence to the western law carries on the demonstration, in the hope can contribute to Hart's judicial explanation theory research. In the construction of our country's rule of law, the legal certainty is the foundation, which requires the legal language to be precise and strict. Because of the complexity of the legal practice, it is difficult to avoid the ambiguity of the legal language. The study of Hart's theory of judicial interpretation has certain enlightenment significance for realizing the accuracy of legal language and defending the certainty of law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：海南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D909.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;[J];;年期

2 ;[J];;年期

3 ;[J];;年期

4 ;[J];;年期

5 ;[J];;年期

6 ;[J];;年期

7 ;[J];;年期

8 ;[J];;年期

9 ;[J];;年期

10 彭京宜;論法律語(yǔ)言的模糊性[J];法學(xué)探索.貴州省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1988年00期

，

本文編號(hào)：1849749