發(fā)布時間：2018-04-28 01:40

  本文選題：純粹法學 + 應當　； 參考：《中國政法大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：純粹法學立基于實然與應然的兩分。這就是休謨問題:事實與價值處于不同的領域,事實命題無法推導出價值命題,價值命題也無法推導出事實命題。該問題在法律上的表述就是:法律是什么與法律應當是什么是兩個截然不同的問題。前者描述法律,是實然問題。后者評價法律,是應然問題。 “應當”是規(guī)范的中心,而規(guī)范又是純粹法學的中心。正因為凱爾森對是與應當之間做出了最徹底的區(qū)分,在其規(guī)范之中既排除了道德也排除了事實,純粹法學獨特的架構才得以構建,純之又純的規(guī)范世界才得以形成。所以“應當”在純粹法學之中有相當重要地位。 本文擬在現有凱爾森著述和中文論文的基礎上,對純粹法學中的“應當”做一梳理。同時,既然純粹法學的特點就是從結構上分析實在法。所以從規(guī)范內部結構出發(fā)對應當與存在進行研究有其無法替代的重要意義。本文也意圖貫徹此點:從規(guī)范內部結構著手分析存在與應當之間的關系。提供一個通過“應然”視角觀察純粹法學的角度。 本文結構是首先簡介純粹法學是一門獨立科學之原因,該門科學的先天條件。科學的研究對象是特定的解釋框架。而法學的解釋框架則是實在法規(guī)范。接著分析規(guī)范的架構,指出其內容是強制而形式則是應當。進而分析應當的特點。第四章內容是應當與存在的區(qū)分,凱爾森通過自然法與實在法的區(qū)分,將正義排除出法學。通過法的效力與實效之間的區(qū)分,將事實排除出規(guī)范的概念之外。通過在規(guī)范內部的區(qū)分,將命令說中的意志成分排除出規(guī)范,經過這樣三次提純,最后得出規(guī)范的概念,純粹法學得以形成。
[Abstract]:Pure law is based on both real and deserved two points. This is the question of Hume: the fact and the value are in different fields, the fact proposition can not deduce the value proposition, the value proposition can not deduce the fact proposition. The question in law is that what the law is and what the law should be are two completely different problems. The latter describes the law as a matter of fact.
"Ought" is the center of norm, and the norm is the center of pure law. It is precisely because Kelsen makes the most thorough distinction between it and it. In its norms, it excludes morality and excludes facts. The unique structure of pure jurisprudence is constructed, pure and pure standard world can be formed. So "should" There is a very important position in pure jurisprudence.
On the basis of the existing writings of Kelsen and Chinese, this article is to sort out the "ought" in the pure law. At the same time, since the characteristic of the pure law is to analyze the actual law from the structure, it has its irreplaceable significance to the study of the existence and the existence from the internal structure of the standard. This article also aims to carry out this point. From the standpoint of internal structure, we should analyze the relationship between existence and ought to provide a perspective of pure jurisprudence from the perspective of "ought to be".
The structure of this article is first to introduce the reason that pure law is an independent science, the innate condition of the science. The object of science is the specific framework of interpretation. The framework of the interpretation of law is the standard of reality. Then, the framework of the standard is analyzed, and the content is the compulsory and the form is ought to be. Fourth The content of the chapter is the distinction between the law and the existence. Through the distinction between the natural law and the real law, Kelsen excludes the justice from the law. Through the distinction between the effectiveness and the effectiveness of the law, the fact is excluded from the concept of the standard. Through the distinction between the norms, the will components in the command theory are excluded from the norms, and the three purification, finally, is the last. The concept of standard is obtained, and pure law is formed.

【學位授予單位】：中國政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D90

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前5條

1 劉葉深;;評凱爾森的法律效力理論[J];廈門大學法律評論;2007年01期

2 陳銳;論法律實證主義[J];河南師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2005年01期

3 中山龍一,周永勝;二十世紀法理學的范式轉換[J];外國法譯評;2000年03期

4 梁曉儉;試論凱爾森基礎規(guī)范理論的合理性[J];現代法學;2002年01期

5 王莉君;論凱爾森純粹法理論的基本概念[J];政法論壇;2003年06期

相關碩士學位論文 前3條

1 張書友;法律實證主義傳統中的凱爾森[D];中國政法大學;2005年

2 馬英;理解凱爾森[D];吉林大學;2005年

3 魏延娜;凱爾森的規(guī)范理論研究[D];山東大學;2010年

，

本文編號：1813222