本文選題：明代 + 公罪�。� 參考：《貴州社會(huì)科學(xué)》2016年07期

【摘要】：公罪指官吏在行使職權(quán)過程中犯錯(cuò),并不涉及個(gè)人私利。明代公罪制度建立于前代經(jīng)驗(yàn)之上,故而頗顯完備。但過于復(fù)雜繁多的立法難免會(huì)讓官吏們有動(dòng)輒犯罪的擔(dān)心,這在一定程度上會(huì)挫傷其行事的積極性。此外,不斷增多的吏、兵兩部處分則例使得部分正直之士無所適從,亦使得部分奸詐官吏妄行引擬或移情就例,故出入人罪。公、私兩類犯罪的性質(zhì)相異,對(duì)于官吏仕途的影響截然不同,故而區(qū)分意義重大,但兩者界限的模糊性容易導(dǎo)致律法適用的不公正性。
[Abstract]:Public crime refers to the official in the exercise of power in the process of making mistakes, does not involve personal interests. The system of public crime in Ming Dynasty was based on the experience of the previous generation, so it was quite complete. But too complicated legislation will inevitably make officials have the fear of crime, which will dampen their enthusiasm to some extent. In addition, the increasing number of officials, the two rules of punishment made part of the integrity of the people at a loss, but also made some false officials to lead or empathize for example, so the crime of invading people. The nature of public crime and private crime is different, and the influence on official career is very different, so the distinction is of great significance, but the ambiguity of the two kinds of crimes can easily lead to the unfairness of the application of the law.
【作者單位】： 北方民族大學(xué);
【基金】：北方民族大學(xué)校級(jí)項(xiàng)目“明代公罪制度與現(xiàn)代官員問責(zé)制”(2014XY536)
【分類號(hào)】：D929

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 許前川;;明朝初期公罪刑罰適用利弊考究[J];蘭臺(tái)世界;2014年18期

，

本文編號(hào)：1799871