本文選題：唐律 + 正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)�。� 參考：《鄭州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：在倡導(dǎo)法治的當(dāng)下,正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)制度突顯出的打擊、威懾違法犯罪活動(dòng),保護(hù)人民合法權(quán)益,激勵(lì)人們同違法犯罪作斗爭(zhēng)的作用,愈發(fā)顯得意義非凡。實(shí)踐中,越來(lái)越多的人認(rèn)識(shí)到正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的重要性,并且有意識(shí)的援引正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)制度保障自身和他人的合法權(quán)益。其實(shí),我國(guó)正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)制度不僅可以追溯到遠(yuǎn)古的奴隸社會(huì),而且在漫長(zhǎng)的歲月中不斷吸收先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)完善發(fā)展。到了唐代,正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)制度發(fā)展到全新的高度,不僅內(nèi)容豐富,構(gòu)成嚴(yán)密,而且適用范圍擴(kuò)大,成為封建法制的閃光之處。本文立足于唐律正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)制度,綜合運(yùn)用歷史分析方法、比較分析方法、邏輯分析方法和語(yǔ)義分析方法,剖析唐律正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的主要內(nèi)容,特征及成因,價(jià)值、功能及影響。文章主要從以下幾個(gè)方面加以闡述:第一部分緒論,主要介紹了正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的司法實(shí)踐現(xiàn)狀和研究唐律正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)制度的期望,總結(jié)了前輩學(xué)者對(duì)唐律正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)制度的研究現(xiàn)狀,介紹了研究的路徑和行文結(jié)構(gòu)。第二部分正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的基本內(nèi)容,總結(jié)正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的概念,分析正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的構(gòu)成要件,介紹正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)制度的歷史進(jìn)程。第三部分唐律正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)制度的主要內(nèi)容,結(jié)合歷史案例,從正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的起因條件、時(shí)間條件、對(duì)象條件、限度條件和主觀條件加以限定剖析,總結(jié)出唐律規(guī)制的五種正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)情形,其中相互斗毆中一方持刃相逼和動(dòng)物傷人損物的正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)情形,依據(jù)刑法理論和律條上下文深度挖掘而來(lái)。第四部分唐律正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)制度的特點(diǎn)和成因,從律文在唐律中的結(jié)構(gòu)關(guān)系,防衛(wèi)主體、對(duì)象和限度,以及正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的價(jià)值層面去分析正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的特點(diǎn),從防衛(wèi)本能、復(fù)仇行為的應(yīng)對(duì)和公力救濟(jì)的滯后解析唐律正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)制度的成因。第五部分唐律正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)制度的價(jià)值、功能和影響,從秩序、正義和效率層面分析唐律正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)對(duì)其的推進(jìn)作用,從否定、保護(hù)、補(bǔ)充、激勵(lì)角度解析唐律正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的功能,從后世王朝對(duì)唐律正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的繼承和發(fā)揚(yáng)方面分析其影響。第六部分結(jié)語(yǔ),對(duì)唐律正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的總體評(píng)價(jià)和研究中的不足。
[Abstract]:At the moment of advocating the rule of law, the legitimate defense system highlights the striking, deterrence of illegal and criminal activities, protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the people, encouraging people to fight against illegal crime, it is increasingly significant. In practice, more and more people realize the importance of legitimate defense, and consciously invoke the legitimate defense system to protect the legitimate rights and interests of themselves and others. In fact, China's legitimate defense system can not only trace back to ancient slave society, but also continuously absorb advanced experience and perfect development in the long years. In the Tang Dynasty, the legitimate defense system developed to a new height, not only rich in content, strict composition, but also the scope of application expanded, become the shimmering of feudal legal system. Based on the system of legitimate defense of Tang Dynasty, this paper makes comprehensive use of historical analysis method, comparative analysis method, logic analysis method and semantic analysis method to analyze the main content, characteristics and causes, value, function and influence of the legitimate defense of Tang law. The article mainly elaborates from the following several aspects: the first part is the introduction, mainly introduced the justifiable defense judicial practice present situation and the research Tang law legitimate defense system expectation, summarized the predecessor scholar to the Tang Dynasty law justifiable defense system research present situation. This paper introduces the path and structure of the research. The second part is the basic content of justifiable defense, summarizes the concept of legitimate defense, analyzes the constitutive elements of legitimate defense, and introduces the historical process of legitimate defense system. The third part of the main content of the legitimate defense system of Tang Dynasty, combined with historical cases, from the cause of legitimate defense conditions, time conditions, object conditions, limit conditions and subjective conditions to be limited and analyzed. This paper sums up five kinds of legitimate defense situations of Tang law regulation, in which one side holds the edge in the fight and the legitimate defense situation of the animal injure object, according to the criminal law theory and the law article context depth excavates the situation. The fourth part is about the characteristics and causes of the legitimate defense system of Tang Dynasty. It analyzes the characteristics of legitimate defense from the perspective of its structure, main body, object and limit, as well as the value level of legitimate defense. The response of revenge act and the lag of public relief analyze the causes of the legitimate defense system of Tang Law. The fifth part is about the value, function and influence of the legitimate defense system of Tang Dynasty. It analyzes the function of the legitimate defense of Tang Dynasty from the aspects of order, justice and efficiency, and analyzes the function of the legitimate defense of the Tang Dynasty from the perspective of negation, protection, supplement and encouragement. This paper analyzes the influence of the later dynasties on the inheritance and development of the legitimate defense of the Tang Dynasty. The sixth part of the conclusion, the overall evaluation of the legitimate defense of the Tang Dynasty and the deficiencies in the study.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D929

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

中國(guó)期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù) 前10條

1 楊宗輝,郭澤強(qiáng);正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)制度的再思考——從刑法第20條第3款切入[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2001年04期

2 郭澤強(qiáng),賈彬;正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)制度之價(jià)值觀念層面的思考[J];云南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(法學(xué)版);2003年02期

3 勞東燕;;正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)制度的背后[J];清華法學(xué);2006年01期

4 李寶忠;;我國(guó)古代正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)制度分析[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年06期

5 徐麗;;淺談唐代正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)制度[J];湘潮(下半月);2011年05期

6 李陽(yáng);;正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)制度之價(jià)值層面的思考[J];旅游縱覽(行業(yè)版);2012年05期

7 倪華;;正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)制度利弊淺談[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年01期

8 江凌燕;;古今正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)制度比較[J];人民論壇;2013年02期

9 高景山 ,趙樹(shù)林;試論正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)制度的功能與發(fā)展問(wèn)題[J];山東法學(xué);1988年02期

10 顧土東;試論正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)制度[J];襄樊學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1999年04期

中國(guó)重要會(huì)議論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù) 前1條

1 錢泳宏;;我國(guó)的正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)制度遭遇“受虐婦女綜合癥”理論的沖擊——以受虐殺夫案為視角[A];全國(guó)外國(guó)法制史研究會(huì)學(xué)術(shù)叢書——混合的法律文化[C];2007年

中國(guó)碩士學(xué)位論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù) 前5條

1 陳勇;唐律正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)制度研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2017年

2 劉璐;張福林故意傷害案研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2016年

3 柳為為;論逆防衛(wèi)[D];山東大學(xué);2017年

4 劉剛;中國(guó)正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)制度研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2005年

5 金洪熙;中韓正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)制度比較研究[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：1789419