本文選題：歐盟 + 成員國�。� 參考：《社會(huì)科學(xué)論壇》2014年08期

【摘要】：轉(zhuǎn)嫁抗辯與間接購買者的訴訟地位問題,是歐盟反托拉斯損害賠償訴訟統(tǒng)一協(xié)調(diào)立法中無法回避的問題。該文對(duì)歐盟主要成員國處理該問題的現(xiàn)行立法及實(shí)踐進(jìn)行了比較。歐洲法院在判例中確認(rèn)了遭受反托拉斯損害的"任何人"提起損害賠償訴訟的權(quán)利,但將轉(zhuǎn)嫁抗辯問題留給了各成員國自行解決。在白皮書中,歐盟委員會(huì)針對(duì)間接購買者的訴訟地位以及轉(zhuǎn)嫁抗辯問題,提出了具體建議措施。這些措施立足于歐盟法律文化及傳統(tǒng),從政治層面尊重了各成員國的傳統(tǒng)民事法律秩序,但也同時(shí)存在一定的技術(shù)性缺陷。
[Abstract]:The question of the litigation status of the transferee and the indirect buyer is an unavoidable problem in the unified and coordinated legislation of the EU antitrust damages litigation.This paper compares the existing legislation and practice of EU member states in dealing with this problem.In its jurisprudence, the European Court of Justice affirmed the right of "any person" who had suffered antitrust damage to sue for damages, but left the question of the transfer of defences to the member States themselves.In the white paper, the European Commission proposes specific measures to address the litigation status of indirect purchasers and the transfer of defences.These measures are based on the legal culture and tradition of the European Union and respect the traditional civil legal order of the member states from the political level, but at the same time there are some technical defects.
【作者單位】： 山東政法學(xué)院經(jīng)貿(mào)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：山東政法學(xué)院科研發(fā)展計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目《經(jīng)營者之間合作的反壟斷分析》的階段性研究成果,課題編號(hào)為2014F07B 山東省“十二五”重點(diǎn)學(xué)科經(jīng)濟(jì)法學(xué)建設(shè)項(xiàng)目資助成果
【分類號(hào)】：D95;DD912.29
，

本文編號(hào)：1734853