本文選題：法治中國 + 指標(biāo)體系��； 參考：《浙江大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：法治評(píng)估將數(shù)據(jù)量化技術(shù)引入到法治考核領(lǐng)域,是社會(huì)治理領(lǐng)域的一次重大方法論創(chuàng)新。中共十八屆三中全會(huì)提出要"建立科學(xué)的法治建設(shè)指標(biāo)體系",這是法治建設(shè)評(píng)估第一次出現(xiàn)在最高的中央文件中。雖然法治建設(shè)評(píng)估在國內(nèi)幾個(gè)區(qū)域內(nèi)已進(jìn)行了不同的實(shí)踐,但是無論從指標(biāo)程序設(shè)計(jì)還是區(qū)域內(nèi)實(shí)施,都存在不同程度的缺陷。法治中國的評(píng)估考核,首先應(yīng)從理解"法治中國"的內(nèi)涵入手,根據(jù)法治中國建設(shè)的要求,制定全面可執(zhí)行的法治建設(shè)評(píng)估考核體系,法治中國建設(shè)評(píng)估的關(guān)鍵點(diǎn)在于如何設(shè)定可量化評(píng)估的指標(biāo),運(yùn)用統(tǒng)計(jì)量化技術(shù)得出科學(xué)的量化結(jié)論,以評(píng)估促考核,以考核促法治發(fā)展。法治中國建設(shè)評(píng)估與考核終將成為法治中國建設(shè)有力的助推器。本文的研究立足于中國法治發(fā)展的特色和發(fā)展的現(xiàn)狀,以探究建立一個(gè)全面、系統(tǒng)、科學(xué)、可執(zhí)行的法治中國建設(shè)指標(biāo)體系和考核標(biāo)準(zhǔn)為目標(biāo),從法治中國建設(shè)的內(nèi)涵要義入手,闡述法治中國評(píng)估考核的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義及應(yīng)堅(jiān)持的基本定位;第二部分論述從法治指標(biāo)的一般特征和類型,到一個(gè)完整的法治中國建設(shè)指標(biāo)體系的設(shè)計(jì),設(shè)計(jì)了法治中國建設(shè)的八個(gè)維度,分三級(jí)指標(biāo),層層遞進(jìn);第三部分是指標(biāo)體系的科學(xué)量化方法的設(shè)計(jì),包括原始數(shù)據(jù)的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化處理過程、權(quán)重賦值的方法和指標(biāo)體系運(yùn)算規(guī)則的選取,本部分以目前國內(nèi)存在的幾大區(qū)域法治評(píng)估量化方法為例,指出其法治評(píng)估設(shè)計(jì)與實(shí)施的可借鑒經(jīng)驗(yàn)和應(yīng)注意的問題;最后一部分緊扣考核主題,包括考核標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的設(shè)計(jì)和考核程序的實(shí)施兩部分,明晰法治中國建設(shè)評(píng)估的功用。
[Abstract]:It is an important methodological innovation in the field of social governance to introduce the data quantification technology into the field of rule of law assessment.The third Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee proposed "establishing a scientific index system for the construction of the rule of law", which is the first time that the evaluation of the construction of the rule of law appears in the highest central document.Although the evaluation of the construction of rule of law has been carried out in different practice in several regions of our country, there are some defects in the index program design and the implementation in the region.The evaluation and assessment of China under the rule of law should begin with the understanding of the connotation of "China under the rule of law" and establish a comprehensive and enforceable evaluation and assessment system for the construction of China under the rule of law according to the requirements of the construction of China under the rule of law.The key point of the evaluation of China's construction under the rule of law lies in how to set the quantifiable evaluation index and draw the scientific quantitative conclusion by using the statistical quantification technique, so as to evaluate and promote the development of the rule of law.The evaluation and assessment of the construction of China ruled by law will eventually become a powerful booster for the construction of China ruled by law.Based on the characteristics of the development of China's rule of law and the present situation of its development, this paper aims at exploring the establishment of a comprehensive, systematic, scientific and enforceable index system and assessment standards for the construction of China under the rule of law.Starting with the connotation of the construction of China under the rule of law, this paper expounds the realistic significance and the basic orientation of the evaluation and assessment of the rule of law in China. The second part discusses the general characteristics and types of the index of rule of law.To the design of a complete index system for the construction of China under the rule of law, eight dimensions of the construction of China under the rule of law have been designed, which can be divided into three levels of indicators, and the third part is the design of the scientific quantitative method of the index system.It includes the standardization process of raw data, the method of weight assignment and the selection of operational rules of index system. This part takes the quantitative method of evaluating the rule of law in several large regions in our country as an example.The author points out that the design and implementation of the rule of law evaluation can draw lessons from the experience and problems that should be paid attention to, and the last part is closely related to the subject of examination, including the design of the assessment standard and the implementation of the assessment procedure, so as to clarify the function of the evaluation of the construction of the rule of law in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D920.0

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄭智航;;中國量化法治實(shí)踐中的定性與定量——以地方法治評(píng)估實(shí)踐為研究對(duì)象[J];東北師大學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年06期

2 周祖成;楊惠琪;;法治如何定量——我國法治評(píng)估量化方法評(píng)析[J];法學(xué)研究;2016年03期

3 錢弘道;王朝霞;;論中國法治評(píng)估的轉(zhuǎn)型[J];中國社會(huì)科學(xué);2015年05期

4 姚頡靖;彭輝;;上海法治評(píng)估的實(shí)證分析[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2015年02期

5 汪全勝;;法治評(píng)估主體的模式探析[J];法治研究;2015年02期

6 喻中;;黨的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)是理解中國法治的鑰匙[J];現(xiàn)代人才;2014年05期

7 何東;沈費(fèi)偉;;“法治GDP”變革政績觀[J];浙江人大;2014年05期

8 徐漢明;林必恒;張孜儀;;論法治建設(shè)指標(biāo)體系和考核標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的科學(xué)構(gòu)建[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2014年01期

9 陳云良;;加快建設(shè)法治中國可走的四條捷徑[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2013年05期

10 劉紅臻;;“法治中國建設(shè)理論與實(shí)踐研討會(huì)”綜述[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2013年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：1733693