本文選題：日本裁判員　切入點：陪審制度　出處：《蘇州大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：陪審制度因其能夠促進司法公正、民主,體現(xiàn)司法權威,對公權力的濫用起到一定的限制作用,成為近現(xiàn)代法制社會民眾直接參與國家司法活動最典型的一種形式。而日本于2004年5月21日制定了《關于裁判員參與刑事裁判的法律》,并在經(jīng)過了五年的準備和宣傳之后,于2009年5月21日起正式實施。日本的裁判員制度是旨在提高國民對司法的理解和信賴,而設計的在日本國民中選任裁判員與法官一起共同參與地方法院一審刑事訴訟程序的一項刑事訴訟制度。它作為一種日本在停止實施陪審制六十多年后又重新建立的司法改革制度,其實施原因在于它能體現(xiàn)程序正義、司法民主和司法信賴、并在一定程度上能幫助日本走出其當今司法制度的困境,即司法的過于精密和司法官僚主義。整部《關于裁判員參與刑事裁判的法律》分為八章:第一章總則介紹了制定本法的目的和意義。第二章裁判員,分為三節(jié)規(guī)定了裁判員的選任和解任資格、方式和程序。第三章裁判員參與審判的程序,包括審判準備及準備程序。第四章評議。第五章區(qū)分審理決定及審判特例。第六章裁判員等的保護措施。第七章雜則。第八章罰則及最后的附則。筆者在本文第二章重點系統(tǒng)介紹日本這部裁判員法的內(nèi)容,并通過其與大陸法系及英美法系國家的陪審制的比較和日本本國的有關爭論,對該法作出一定的理解和分析。筆者于第三章首先對日本在裁判員制度問題上表現(xiàn)出的正反意見做一個簡要介紹,在此基礎上剖析我國目前人民陪審員制度的本質(zhì)和實施現(xiàn)狀,并通過與日本裁判員法的比較,試圖探索一些對完善我國人民陪審員制度有益的經(jīng)驗,并在適用案件、人民陪審員的選任、人民陪審員的權利和義務、對人民陪審員的保護、社會環(huán)境和配套制度等方面提出一些改進和完善的構想。最后在對陪審制在世界范圍內(nèi)的運行情況和趨勢作出簡要分析后,提出我國人民陪審員制度改革的基本方向和趨勢,希望以此來使我國的人民陪審員制度能得到改善和成熟。
[Abstract]:Because of the jury system can promote judicial justice, democracy, reflecting the judicial authority, to certain restrictions on the abuse of public power has become a form of modern legal society people directly participate in the national judicial activities of the most typical. Japan was established in May 21, 2004 to participate in the law > < criminal judgment, and in after five years of preparation and propaganda, formally implemented from May 21, 2009. The Japanese National Jury system is designed to improve understanding and trust in the judiciary, a criminal litigation system and the design of the Japanese people in the selection of judges and judges together to participate in the local court of criminal proceedings. It is a kind of Japan to stop the implementation of the jury system more than 60 years after the re establishment of the judicial system reform, the reason is that it reflects the procedural justice, judicial democracy and judicial trust, And to a certain extent, can help Japan out of its current justice system dilemma, namely justice is too sophisticated and judicial bureaucracy. The whole "about jury in criminal adjudication law > is divided into eight chapters: the first chapter introduces the purpose and significance of this law. The second chapter judge, is divided into three sections the provisions of the selection and dismissal of judges qualifications, methods and procedures. The third chapter judges in the trial procedure, including trial preparation and preparation procedure. The fourth chapter review. The fifth chapter differentiates the trial decision and the trial case. The sixth chapter judges protection measures. In the seventh chapter. The eighth chapter is miscellaneous penalties and final in the annex. This method introduces the Japanese referee in the second chapter of this paper focuses on the system's content, and by the debate and comparison of jury system of civil law and common law and Japan, the method to make certain Understanding and analysis. The author in the third chapter of the pros and cons of Japan in the referee system showed on the issue made a brief introduction, based on the analysis of China's current nature of the people's jury system and the implementation of the status quo, and by comparison with the Japanese referee method, attempts to explore on improving the people's jury system in China the beneficial experience, and in the case, the selection of jurors, rights and obligations of the people's jury, protection of the people's assessors, and puts forward some ideas of improving and perfecting the social environment and supporting system and so on. At last make a brief Analysis on operation situation and trend of the jury system in the world. Put forward the basic direction and trend of China's jury system reform, hoping to make the Chinese people's assessor system can be improved and mature.

【學位授予單位】：蘇州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D931.3;DD915.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前5條

1 姚莉;;中國陪審制度的理論反思和制度重構[J];法學家;2003年06期

2 何家弘;;陪審制度縱橫論[J];法學家;1999年03期

3 章禮明;評俄羅斯刑事陪審團制度的重建[J];河北法學;2004年08期

4 劉晴;段明學;;走向精密司法——日本起訴便宜主義論析[J];樂山師范學院學報;2006年07期

5 鄭賢君;陪審制:司法民主的制度保障[J];首都師范大學學報(社會科學版);1998年04期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 劉薇;日本第三次司法改革研究[D];吉林大學;2006年

相關碩士學位論文 前3條

1 楊建華;刑事陪審制度研究[D];四川大學;2007年

2 周珂;論刑事陪審制度[D];中國政法大學;2007年

3 李琳;論中國陪審制度[D];湘潭大學;2007年

，

本文編號：1715355