本文選題：自誣服　切入點：刑訊　出處：《遼寧大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：“自誣服”是存在于我國古代的一種司法現象,彰顯著我國古代審結案件的某些特點。對此類司法現象進行證據、訴訟制度、法官責任、律令規(guī)定等諸多方面的深入分析,可以豐富法律史研究,特別是對當今司法審判具有較高的借鑒反思價值。“自誣服”現象反映出冤案形成的過程和冤案平反結果。近年來,我國司法實踐中也頻發(fā)冤假錯案,這些冤假錯案給當事人造成了物質精神上的重大損失,也極大地損害了國家的司法權威,阻礙了我國法治建設的進程,也引起了較大的社會關注。對我國古代“自誣服”現象進行研究,可以幫助我們更好地分析冤假錯案的形成原因,從中汲取經驗教訓。論文梳理了我國古代“自誣服”司法現象,與疑案進行對比分析。對“自誣服”的原因進行了分析,認為我國古代適用有罪推定原則,采用刑訊制度,司法權的從屬化以及口供中心主義是造成“自誣服”的主要原因。通過梳理古代的司法制度與措施,指出中國古代對“自誣服”現象采取一系列避免措施和糾正程序。通過對“自誣服”現象司法邏輯的總結,結合現代冤假錯案,提煉一些可資借鑒的因素,從中獲得啟示。通過對“自誣服”案例的研究,得出關于這類案件的理論依據,并把理論與實踐相結合,把對“自誣服”現象的邏輯總結與分析運用到實踐中來,理論聯系實際,并且更好的運用于現代案例中,使之推動案件的發(fā)展,減少錯誤案件的產生。
[Abstract]:"self-false conviction" is a kind of judicial phenomenon in ancient China, which shows some characteristics of Chinese ancient cases.The in-depth analysis of such judicial phenomena, such as evidence, litigation system, judge's responsibility, law and order and so on, can enrich the study of the history of law, especially has a higher value of reference and reflection to the judicial trial today.The phenomenon of self-falsehood reflects the process of the formation of injustice and the result of redress.In recent years, the judicial practice of our country has also frequently resulted in false and wrong cases, which have caused material and spiritual losses to the parties, and have greatly damaged the judicial authority of the state and hindered the process of the construction of the rule of law in our country.It has also aroused greater social concern.The study of the phenomenon of "false conviction" in ancient China can help us to better analyze the reasons for the formation of unjust false and wrong cases and draw lessons from them.This paper combs the judicial phenomenon of "self-false conviction" in ancient China and makes a comparative analysis with suspected cases.This paper analyzes the reasons of "false conviction", and holds that the principle of presumption of guilt in ancient China, the system of torture, the subordination of judicial power and the doctrine of confession centralism are the main causes of "falsehood".By combing the ancient judicial system and measures, this paper points out that ancient China took a series of measures to avoid and correct the phenomenon of "false conviction".By summing up the judicial logic of the phenomenon of "false conviction" and combining with the modern case of false and false, we can extract some factors that can be used for reference and get enlightenment from it.Through the study of the case of "false conviction", the theoretical basis of this kind of case is obtained, and the theory and practice are combined, the logic summary and analysis of the phenomenon of "falsely false conviction" is applied to practice, and the theory is combined with practice.And better used in modern cases, to promote the development of cases, reduce the emergence of false cases.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D90-051

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 霍存福;;宋代“鞫讞分司”:“聽”“斷”合一與分立的體制機制考察[J];社會科學輯刊;2016年06期

2 吳海航;;中國古代如何防止冤假錯案的發(fā)生[J];人民論壇;2016年20期

3 楊東須;;論古代的刑訊逼供及對現代法治的啟發(fā)[J];佳木斯職業(yè)學院學報;2016年04期

4 朱孝清;;冤假錯案的原因和對策[J];中國刑事法雜志;2014年02期

5 田也異;;宋代法官錯案追究制的再審視——兼評我國現行錯案追究制[J];研究生法學;2014年02期

6 楊興培;;歷史上冤假錯案是怎樣釀成的[J];檢察風云;2014年06期

7 柳正權;;中國古代定罪原則的法文化分析[J];武漢大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2012年06期

8 祖?zhèn)?;中國古代證據法文化透視——以語詞“供”“證”為中心[J];遼寧大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2012年04期

9 祖?zhèn)?;中國古代“據眾證定罪”證據規(guī)則論[J];當代法學;2012年01期

10 歐陽本祺;;論我國定罪思維的傳統(tǒng)及其演化[J];法律科學(西北政法大學學報);2010年03期

，

本文編號：1710920