德國侵權(quán)法上的繼發(fā)性損害類型及其啟示
發(fā)布時間:2018-04-02 14:40
本文選題:繼發(fā)性損害 切入點:整體性利益 出處:《現(xiàn)代法學(xué)》2017年03期
【摘要】:在標(biāo)的物所有權(quán)移轉(zhuǎn)后因其自身自始即存在的瑕疵,導(dǎo)致物之整體價值減少、無法使用或完全滅失的場合下,當(dāng)受害人因物之瑕疵擔(dān)保責(zé)任時效期間屆滿而無法通過合同責(zé)任主張法律救濟時,德國司法實踐為給受害人提供充分法律救濟,而通過法之續(xù)造,發(fā)展出所有權(quán)侵害的繼發(fā)性損害類型,并將之納入《民法典》第823條第1款的涵攝范疇,為受害人提供了適當(dāng)?shù)木葷桨。對中國的司法實踐而言,在中國特色社會主義法律體系已經(jīng)形成時,審慎關(guān)注德國司法實踐于此通過規(guī)范解釋路徑處理法之安全性與向社會生活開放性間之緊張關(guān)系的有益經(jīng)驗,有助于法院具體案件審理時,能在維護法之安全以及權(quán)威的同時保障具體人在法律上的充分實現(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:Where, after the transfer of title to the subject matter, there are defects that exist from the beginning of the subject matter, resulting in the reduction of the overall value of the object, it is impossible to use it or is completely lost,When the victim cannot claim legal relief through contractual liability because of the expiration of the limitation period of guarantee liability in rem, the judicial practice in Germany provides sufficient legal relief to the victim, and through the continuation of the law,The author develops the type of secondary damage of the infringement of ownership, and brings it into the scope of Article 823 (1) of the Civil Code, which provides an appropriate relief scheme for the victim.As far as China's judicial practice is concerned, when the socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics has been formed,Careful attention is paid to the beneficial experience of German judicial practice in regulating the tension between the security of the approach to interpretation and openness to social life, which is helpful to the trial of specific cases in the courts.Can safeguard the security and authority of the law while ensuring the full realization of the law.
【作者單位】: 中央財經(jīng)大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】:北京市2015年社會科學(xué)基金項目(15FXC046) 中央財經(jīng)大學(xué)2014年度中財121人才工程青年博士發(fā)展基金(QBJ1407)
【分類號】:D951.6;DD913
,
本文編號:1700879
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/1700879.html