本文選題：“鞫讞分司”　切入點：“推駁”　出處：《社會科學(xué)輯刊》2016年06期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：宋代府州一級審判一般有推勘、錄問、檢法、擬判、審核、判決六道程序。"推駁(推正、駁正)"制度是理解當(dāng)時司法程序的樞紐。法司"駁正"與錄問"駁正"針對府州鞫司的"鞫獄不當(dāng)"。鞫司針對下級機構(gòu)的"推正"和府州內(nèi)諸鞫司之間互相移推是"推正"的二種類型,宋代法律從正面直接規(guī)定了錄問官的駁正權(quán)。"定奪駁正"主要是針對"入人死罪"的情形。其上的幕職官及通判以"定奪"程序糾正"檢法不當(dāng)",而不是"別推"。"定奪駁正"是"當(dāng)職官"以程序權(quán)力"駁正"冤案。開封府幕職官以推鞫為業(yè),對刑事案件有建言權(quán)。"鞫讞分司"不排斥長官與副職參與,有長貳參與的聚議制度是長官制體制大背景所引致的必然結(jié)果,也是展示各方意見的好平臺,可供長官做最后定奪。關(guān)注鞫、讞之外的其他程序,包括錄問官與錄問程序,幕職官的角色與作用等,不忽略其他官員或機構(gòu)的存在和貢獻(xiàn),是正確、適度評價"鞫讞分司"及鞫讞雙方作用所必須堅持的立場,"鞫讞分司"是我國古代"聽""斷"合一與分立的重要體制。
[Abstract]:In the Song Dynasty, there were six procedures for prefectural first-level trials, such as inquiring, recording, examining, preparing, examining, and judging. "push (push and correct)," he said. The system is the hub of understanding the judicial process at that time. The law department "refutes the justice" and the record "refute" is directed at the "improper prison" of the prefectural department. Are two types of "pushing straight", The law of the Song Dynasty directly stipulated the right of rebuttal of the interrogators. "the decision to refute the right" is mainly aimed at the situation of "the crime of entering the death penalty". The curtain officials and the general subpoenas use the procedure of "determination" to correct the "improper examination law" instead of "don't push it". "..." decision to refute justice "is a case of" rebuttal "with procedural power. Kaifeng's office officials are engaged in pushing. Having the right to advise on criminal cases. The "division of the departments and departments" does not exclude the participation of the Chief Executive and his deputy. The system of gathering and discussion with the participation of the Chief Executive is an inevitable result resulting from the background of the system of the Chief Executive system, and it is also a good platform for showing the opinions of all parties. For the Chief Executive to make a final decision. It is correct not to overlook the existence and contribution of other officials or organizations, including the procedures of interrogators and interrogators, the role and role of screen officers, and so on. It is an important system of "listening" and "breaking up" in ancient China to properly evaluate the position which must be adhered to in the role of "division of department" and "division of departments" and the role of "division of departments" and "division of departments" in ancient China.
【作者單位】： 沈陽師范大學(xué);吉林大學(xué)法學(xué)院;沈陽師范大學(xué)法律文化研究中心;中國法律史學(xué)會;
【基金】：國家社會科學(xué)基金重大項目(14ZDC023) 遼寧省教育廳哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)重大基礎(chǔ)理論研究課題
【分類號】：D929

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 婁雨洋;;“鞫讞分司”的價值理念探析[J];商品與質(zhì)量;2012年S6期

2 張文勇;;中國傳統(tǒng)和諧思想與宋代司法的特質(zhì)[J];唐都學(xué)刊;2009年03期

3 鄒瑛;;論減刑權(quán)[J];今日南國(理論創(chuàng)新版);2008年04期

4 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 丁建軍;;論中國古代的法律誠信缺失——以宋朝為對象的考察[A];第六屆河北省社會科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會論文專輯[C];2011年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 李文靜;宋代司法審判中的鞫讞分司[N];學(xué)習(xí)時報;2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王歡;宋代審判制度中的鞫讞分司研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2015年

2 張力巾;宋代鞫讞分司制探析[D];吉林大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號：1634717