本文選題：集體自衛(wèi)權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：國際法　出處：《東北師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：2014年7月及2015年9月,日本相繼解禁了集體自衛(wèi)權(quán)和通過了新安保法案。集體自衛(wèi)權(quán)的解禁,標(biāo)志著日本“專守防衛(wèi)”政策的質(zhì)變,其軍事行動(dòng)力將呈現(xiàn)擴(kuò)大化的趨勢(shì);而新安保法案的頒布實(shí)施,則為這一擴(kuò)大化趨勢(shì)提供了穩(wěn)固的法律保障。對(duì)于國內(nèi)政治由否認(rèn)侵略歷史的保守勢(shì)力來主導(dǎo)的日本來說,這些動(dòng)向無疑是會(huì)引起周邊鄰國及國際社會(huì)的高度關(guān)注及警惕的。本文立足于法理與實(shí)情,全面地就集體自衛(wèi)權(quán)在國際法與(日本)國內(nèi)法上的法律性質(zhì),以及在日本戰(zhàn)后歷史上的展開與推進(jìn)進(jìn)行了探討與分析。這既具有分析日本集體自衛(wèi)權(quán)的法律特點(diǎn)、行使目的、實(shí)施方式等理論上的意義,又具有從日本解禁集體自衛(wèi)權(quán)來分析國際關(guān)系的現(xiàn)實(shí)性意義。文章分為四個(gè)部分。第一章闡述與分析了集體自衛(wèi)權(quán)的法理問題。本章首先從國際法和日本憲法的角度分別對(duì)集體自衛(wèi)權(quán)進(jìn)行了解讀,并在最后證明了禁止行使集體自衛(wèi)權(quán)的日本憲法與承認(rèn)國家享有集體自衛(wèi)權(quán)的國際法,在本質(zhì)上是不沖突的。第二章探討了歷史視角下日本集體自衛(wèi)權(quán)的發(fā)展情況。本章首先探討了日本充實(shí)集體自衛(wèi)權(quán)行使基礎(chǔ)的五個(gè)階段,隨后就對(duì)這以上發(fā)展階段起推動(dòng)作用的內(nèi)、外部?jī)晒闪α窟M(jìn)行了分析。第三章對(duì)安倍內(nèi)閣解禁集體自衛(wèi)權(quán)的相關(guān)問題進(jìn)行了分析。該章從三個(gè)層次對(duì)安倍解禁集體自衛(wèi)權(quán)的目標(biāo)指向進(jìn)行了解讀,并駁斥了安倍內(nèi)閣以“限定容忍”的觀點(diǎn)來謀求解禁集體自衛(wèi)權(quán)的手法,最后就集體自衛(wèi)權(quán)在新安保法案中的呈現(xiàn)特點(diǎn)以及集體自衛(wèi)權(quán)在實(shí)施中的靈活性進(jìn)行了解讀。第四章分析了日本解禁集體自衛(wèi)權(quán)的影響。該章從法律層次上批判了安倍內(nèi)閣解禁集體自衛(wèi)權(quán)的方式以及其在解禁過程中采取的某些行為對(duì)法律秩序造成的破壞,并從現(xiàn)實(shí)層面上認(rèn)為集體自衛(wèi)權(quán)的解禁既會(huì)為日本開啟“發(fā)展盟友模式”,推動(dòng)日本軍工產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展,也會(huì)不利于維護(hù)東北亞以及南海區(qū)域的安全與穩(wěn)定。面對(duì)日本解禁集體自衛(wèi)權(quán)可能引發(fā)的擔(dān)憂,一方面我們期待日本能持續(xù)地珍視和平,另一方面我們?cè)谕ㄟ^對(duì)話與合作的方式爭(zhēng)取日本在和平的道路上持續(xù)前行的同時(shí),也應(yīng)保持著有理、有力、有節(jié)的斗爭(zhēng)。
[Abstract]:In July 2014 and September 2015, Japan lifted the right of collective self-defense and passed the new security law. The lifting of the right of collective self-defense marked the qualitative change of Japan's "special defense" policy, and its military action will show a trend of expansion. The promulgation and implementation of the new security bill provides a firm legal guarantee for this trend of expansion. For Japan, which is dominated by conservative forces that deny its history of aggression, There is no doubt that these trends will arouse great concern and vigilance from neighboring countries and the international community. This article, based on legal theory and facts, comprehensively deals with the legal nature of the right of collective self-defence in international law and (Japan) domestic law. It also discusses and analyzes the development and promotion of Japan's postwar history, which has the theoretical significance of analyzing the legal characteristics, the purpose and the mode of implementation of the right of collective self-defence in Japan. The article is divided into four parts. The first chapter expounds and analyzes the legal principle of collective self-defence. From the perspective of collective self-defense, the right to collective self-defense is interpreted, And finally proved that the Constitution of Japan, which prohibits the exercise of the right to collective self-defence, and the international law which recognizes the right of the State to collective self-defence, The second chapter discusses the development of Japan's right to collective self-defence from the historical perspective. This chapter first discusses the five stages of Japan's enrichment of the basis of the exercise of the right to collective self-defence. And then within the context of these stages of development, The third chapter analyzes the issues related to Abe's cabinet's right to lift the ban on collective self-defense. This chapter interprets the goal of Abe's right of collective self-defense from three levels. And refuted Abe's cabinet's approach of seeking the lifting of the right to collective self-defence with the view of "limited tolerance", Finally, the paper interprets the characteristics of collective self-defence right in the new security act and the flexibility of collective self-defence right in the implementation. Chapter 4th analyzes the influence of the right of collective self-defense in japan. This chapter criticizes the right of collective self-defense from the legal level. The manner in which Abe's cabinet lifted the right to collective self-defence and the damage to the law and order caused by certain acts it has taken in the process of lifting the ban, And from a realistic level, it is believed that the lifting of the right to collective self-defence will not only open the "model of developing allies" for Japan, but also promote the development of Japan's military industry. It will also be detrimental to the maintenance of security and stability in Northeast Asia and the South China Sea. In the face of concerns that may arise from Japan's right to lift its ban on collective self-defence, on the one hand, we expect Japan to continue to cherish peace. On the other hand, while we strive for Japan's sustained progress on the road of peace through dialogue and cooperation, we should also maintain a rational, vigorous and disciplined struggle.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D931.3;DD912.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳開敏;;小布什政府時(shí)期美國對(duì)日政策探析[J];日本研究;2016年03期

2 劉江永;;朝鮮半島局勢(shì)與東北亞可持續(xù)安全[J];東北亞論壇;2016年03期

3 金燦榮;孫西輝;;安倍政府解禁集體自衛(wèi)權(quán)及對(duì)東亞和平的影響[J];東北亞學(xué)刊;2016年01期

4 劉衛(wèi)東;;“可控性解禁”:美國在日本解禁集體自衛(wèi)權(quán)問題上的政策評(píng)析[J];現(xiàn)代國際關(guān)系;2015年04期

5 羅國強(qiáng);;日本解禁集體自衛(wèi)權(quán)之國際違法性分析[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2014年06期

6 徐萬勝;;日本安倍內(nèi)閣解禁集體自衛(wèi)權(quán)評(píng)析[J];南京政治學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年05期

7 張曉磊;;憲法視野下的日本“行使集體自衛(wèi)權(quán)”問題[J];日本學(xué)刊;2014年04期

8 趙學(xué)功;;冷戰(zhàn)時(shí)期美國東亞政策的演變[J];南開學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年06期

9 吳懷中;;日本“集體自衛(wèi)權(quán)”問題的演變和影響[J];日本學(xué)刊;2007年05期

10 童之偉,姜光文;日本的違憲審查制及其啟示[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2005年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1627581