本文選題：美國(guó)專利法　切入點(diǎn)：專利間接侵權(quán)　出處：《知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)》2017年09期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：專利間接侵權(quán)行為構(gòu)成中的主觀要件是侵權(quán)判定的關(guān)鍵部分,我國(guó)最新專利法司法解釋和修訂草案對(duì)此僅作出了籠統(tǒng)的規(guī)定,導(dǎo)致操作性存在不足,學(xué)界和司法實(shí)務(wù)也缺乏主流觀點(diǎn)。上述問(wèn)題會(huì)對(duì)我國(guó)專利間接侵權(quán)制度的實(shí)際效果造成消極影響。我國(guó)專利法規(guī)中的間接侵權(quán)條款以美國(guó)專利法為藍(lán)本,而美國(guó)在主觀要件方面的司法實(shí)踐也最為豐富,具有相當(dāng)?shù)膮⒖純r(jià)值。借鑒美國(guó)經(jīng)驗(yàn),我國(guó)應(yīng)將主觀要件中的過(guò)錯(cuò)限定為故意,規(guī)定"明知"之對(duì)象包括知道專利存在和所促成之行為構(gòu)成侵權(quán)等事實(shí),并在探索"明知"的判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)時(shí)更加注重客觀行為因素的考量。
[Abstract]:The subjective elements in the constitution of patent indirect infringement act are the key part of infringement judgment. The latest patent law judicial interpretation and revision draft of our country only make general provisions, which lead to the deficiency of operation. There is also a lack of mainstream view in academic circles and judicial practice. The above problems will have a negative impact on the actual effect of the indirect patent infringement system in China. The indirect infringement clauses in our patent laws and regulations are based on the United States Patent Law. The judicial practice of the United States in subjective elements is also the most abundant, which has considerable reference value. Using the experience of the United States for reference, our country should limit the fault in the subjective elements to intentional. The object of "knowing" includes the fact that the patent exists and the act contributed to constitute infringement, and pays more attention to the consideration of objective behavior factor when exploring the criterion of "knowing".
【作者單位】： 上海財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)法學(xué)院;北京市順義區(qū)人民法院;
【分類號(hào)】：D971.2;DD913

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 王志雄;安某的行為不構(gòu)成犯罪[J];法律與生活;1994年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：1624300