本文選題：法律空間　切入點(diǎn)：物理空間　出處：《法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展》2017年02期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：法律的空間發(fā)現(xiàn)或許是自法律的語言學(xué)轉(zhuǎn)向以來最重要的理論發(fā)展。既有的理論比較強(qiáng)調(diào)法律的時(shí)間性,卻沒有認(rèn)真對待其空間性。法律與空間關(guān)系的研究起源于物理空間與法律關(guān)系的討論,后來發(fā)展到抽象的社會(huì)空間與法律的關(guān)系研究。不過,既有看似如火如荼的法律與空間的研究將空間視為狹義的管轄范圍、動(dòng)態(tài)過程或者法律運(yùn)行的背景,呈現(xiàn)出"去空間化"的趨勢,使得法律中的"空間"日趨邊緣化。其原因在于,盡管在法律與空間的研究中引入了豐富的地理學(xué)詞匯與語境,但是并沒有本體性意義上的"空間"轉(zhuǎn)向。只有將空間的本體性特征與法律的動(dòng)態(tài)網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)相結(jié)合,才能使法律的"空間"研究回歸正途。
[Abstract]:The space of the law is perhaps the most important discovery of theory development since the steering law of linguistics. The existing theory of comparative law emphasizes the time, but did not take the space seriously. To discuss and study the legal and spatial relations originated in the physical space and the legal relationship, and later to the study of the relationship between the social space and the abstract law however, the existing research and the space law seems like a raging fire take space as the jurisdiction of the narrow, dynamic process or legal background, showing a "space" of the trend, make the law in the "space" has become increasingly marginalized. The reason is that, despite the introduction of context rich vocabulary and geography research in law and space, but there is no ontological meaning of "space" to. Only combining dynamic network structure and Legal Ontology of space, in order to make the law Study on the return to the right path "space".

【作者單位】： 上海交通大學(xué)凱原法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D901
，

本文編號：1613480