發(fā)布時間：2018-03-02 11:28

  本文選題：專利法　切入點：專利權保護　出處：《中國海洋大學》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：中韓兩國的貿(mào)易額持續(xù)增加,專利權的侵權案件每年都在增加。專利權侵權事件的增加使得經(jīng)濟交流受到了很大的損失,所以應該積極地準備專利權保護方案。為了準備專利權保護方案,應該先對兩國的專利權保護制度做到相互了解。這樣的工作不僅對兩國企業(yè)有益,在對準備專利權保護強化方案的準備方面也提供了好了參考資料。 中國是在專利權的保護方面實行雙重保護制度的國家�！半p軌制”即為行政保護和司法保護并存的專利權保護體制。1984年最早出臺了行政保護與司法保護并存的“雙軌制”。到專利法第三次修訂為止,對“雙軌制”進行了確立。專利權的行政保護由專利業(yè)務管理部門和海關負責。專利業(yè)務管理部門的職責是根據(jù)權利人的請求,對侵害行為下達停止侵害命令、調整損失賠償額等,同時也負責對假冒他人專利和專利虛偽標記行為進行管制。海關通過邊境措施,對侵害專利權、商標權、著作權的貨物在通關入國時進行攔阻。專利權司法保護在人民法院實行二審終審制度。專利權者在訴訟中可以申請損失賠償,也可以使用訴前財產(chǎn)保護、訴前證據(jù)保護措施及侵害行為終止制度。對于假冒專利行為可以處以刑事處分。 韓國的情況則是將知識產(chǎn)權嚴格地確立為私權的范疇。韓國的專利權保護體制原則上還只有司法保護一條途徑。韓國的專利業(yè)務管理部門不能像中國那樣對專利侵害行為采取積極的制裁措施。但是由于已經(jīng)認識到了專利權侵害行為的嚴重性,所以為了使專利業(yè)務管理部門及海關也能積極地采取保護措施,法律上正在進行修訂并對各國的相關制度進行研究。韓國的專利權司法保護制度為三級三審制度,對專利權侵害行為履行停止侵害請求、損失賠償請求、不當所得返還請求。對于刑事案件,可以向國家檢查機關提出訴訟。 如果對兩國的專利權保護規(guī)定進行比較,不能判斷哪個國家的法律好,哪個國家的法律差。對一個國家法律作出好與不好的評價主要是依據(jù)是否符合這個國家的國情。兩國專利法保護措施都要考慮到國家的具體情況,來制定專利權的保護措施。兩國為了強化專利權保護,對于不足的部分應該對兩國好的制度進行互相參考,即中國的行政保護運營了27年,韓國也參考實行行政專利保護。中國在設立知識產(chǎn)權專門法院方面,可以借鑒韓國的專利法院的運營。通過對兩國法律的相互理解,吸取相互的長處和有點,然后起到共同進步的效果。
[Abstract]:The volume of trade between China and South Korea continues to increase, and patent infringement cases are increasing every year. The increase in patent infringement incidents has caused great losses to economic exchanges. So we should actively prepare a patent protection plan. In order to prepare a patent protection plan, we should first understand each other about the patent protection system of the two countries. This kind of work is not only beneficial to the enterprises of the two countries, It also provides a good reference for the preparation of enhanced patent protection programs. China is a country where the protection of patent rights is a dual system. The "two-track system" is the patent protection system where administrative protection and judicial protection coexist. In 1984, administrative protection and judicial protection were first introduced. " Until the third revision of the Patent Law, The administrative protection of patent rights is the responsibility of the patent business administration department and the customs. The duty of the patent business administration department is to issue an order to stop the infringement at the request of the obligee. To adjust the amount of compensation for losses, and at the same time be responsible for controlling the counterfeiting of other people's patents and the false marking of patents. The Customs, through border measures, infringes upon patent rights and trademark rights. The judicial protection of patent rights shall be carried out in the people's court under the system of second instance final appeal. The patentee may apply for compensation for loss in litigation, or may use property protection before litigation, Pre-lawsuit evidence protection measures and termination of infringement system. Counterfeiting patent acts may be punished by criminal sanctions. In Korea, intellectual property rights are strictly defined as private rights. In principle, the patent protection system in Korea has only one way of judicial protection. The patent business administration in Korea cannot be as exclusive as China. Positive sanctions have been taken for infringement. However, since the seriousness of patent infringement has been recognized, Therefore, in order to enable the patent business administration and the customs to actively take protective measures, the law is being revised and the relevant systems of various countries are being studied. The judicial protection system for patent rights in Korea is a three-tier third instance system. For the infringement of patent right to fulfill the request for cessation of infringement, for compensation for loss, for the return of improper income. For a criminal case, a lawsuit may be filed with the State inspection organ. If the patent protection provisions of the two countries are compared, it is not possible to judge which country's laws are good. A good or bad assessment of a country's law is mainly based on whether it is in accordance with the national conditions of the country. Both countries' patent law protection measures should take into account the specific conditions of the country. In order to strengthen the protection of patent rights, the two countries should make mutual reference to the good systems of the two countries in order to strengthen the protection of patent rights. That is, China's administrative protection has been in operation for 27 years. South Korea also refers to the implementation of administrative patent protection. China can learn from the operation of Korean patent courts in setting up special courts for intellectual property rights. Through mutual understanding of the laws of the two countries, we can draw on each other's strengths and points. Then the effect of common progress.
【學位授予單位】：中國海洋大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D923.42;D931.26

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 吳漢東;李瑞登;;中國知識產(chǎn)權法學研究30年[J];法商研究;2010年03期

2 文漢圭;;中國專利權行政保護和司法保護制度體制[J];法制與社會;2011年06期

3 杜康;;論知識產(chǎn)權行政保護[J];傳承;2009年16期

4 吳漢東;知識產(chǎn)權保護論[J];法學研究;2000年01期

5 吳漢東;知識產(chǎn)權國際保護制度的變革與發(fā)展[J];法學研究;2005年03期

6 欒穎娜;;論加強專利權的保護[J];韶關學院學報;2009年11期

7 李泰山;;我國知識產(chǎn)權行政保護制度存續(xù)的必要性[J];蘇州教育學院學報;2009年04期

8 劉張洛;;專利權保護的現(xiàn)狀及對策[J];廈門科技;2006年05期

9 王彥輝;;論我國知識產(chǎn)權行政保護制度的完善[J];新鄉(xiāng)教育學院學報;2008年02期

10 鄧建志;;中國知識產(chǎn)權行政保護特色制度的發(fā)展趨勢研究[J];中國軟科學;2008年06期

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 陳東星;中國海關知識產(chǎn)權邊境保護現(xiàn)狀研究[D];中國政法大學;2005年

，

本文編號：1556330