本文關(guān)鍵詞： 公共治理 財(cái)產(chǎn)規(guī)則 侵權(quán)禁令 行政管制　出處：《法制與社會發(fā)展》2017年04期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：追求公共善治需要合適的治理工具。作為事先手段的財(cái)產(chǎn)規(guī)則是轉(zhuǎn)型社會復(fù)雜博弈結(jié)構(gòu)下實(shí)現(xiàn)公共治理的最優(yōu)方式,它契合了風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會的安全訴求,能實(shí)現(xiàn)對損害預(yù)防的有效激勵(lì)。研究表明,私人是比政府更好的財(cái)產(chǎn)規(guī)則的實(shí)施者,這意味著侵權(quán)禁令是比行政管制更優(yōu)的治理路徑。在轉(zhuǎn)型中國,侵權(quán)禁令的推廣適用將在很大程度上補(bǔ)充甚至替代行政執(zhí)法,成為風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會公共治理的新動力。要利用侵權(quán)禁令來提升公共治理水平,必須進(jìn)行全方位的機(jī)制創(chuàng)新,使其更加符合公共決策的需要。
[Abstract]:The property rule as a prior means is the best way to realize the public governance under the complex game structure in the transitional society, which accords with the security demand of the risk society. Research shows that the private sector is the executor of better property rules than the government, which means that tort bans are a better way to govern than administrative regulation. The popularization and application of tort injunction will supplement or even replace administrative law enforcement to a great extent and become a new motive force for public governance in risk society. In order to improve the level of public governance by using tort injunctions, we must carry out all-round mechanism innovation. To make it more in line with the needs of public decision-making.
【作者單位】： 中山大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：2016年度中國法學(xué)會部級法學(xué)研究課題“損害賠償訴訟中的司法認(rèn)知與策略行為研究”(CLS(2016)D03) 2014年“廣東特支計(jì)劃”青年文化英才項(xiàng)目的階段性成果
【分類號】：D920.0
，

本文編號：1544287