本文關(guān)鍵詞： 分離命題 拉德布魯赫公式 不正義論據(jù) 正確性宣稱 實(shí)證主義　出處：《新西部(理論版)》2016年16期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：阿列克西在其《法概念與法效力》一書中,從一個(gè)非實(shí)證主義者的角度探討了法概念與法效力的問題。全書針對(duì)分離命題進(jìn)行批判,從實(shí)證主義的立場、法概念到法效力逐一展開。重點(diǎn)從參與者視角對(duì)個(gè)別規(guī)范中的不正義論據(jù)進(jìn)行回應(yīng),以包容道德原則為標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行批判性論證,得出法律與道德之間具有必然的聯(lián)系,并進(jìn)而提出自己的法律定義。但在不正義論據(jù)上,阿列克西存在錯(cuò)誤�；谶@些錯(cuò)誤,展開對(duì)實(shí)證主義與分離命題的辯護(hù)。
[Abstract]:In his book the concept and validity of Law, Oleksiy discusses the concept of law and the validity of law from the point of view of a non-positivist. From the perspective of participants, the author focuses on responding to the unjust arguments in individual norms and making a critical argument based on the criterion of including moral principles, and draws the conclusion that there is an inevitable link between law and morality. And then put forward his own legal definition. But in the case of injustice, Oleksiy is wrong. Based on these mistakes, the thesis of positivism and separation is defended.
【作者單位】： 華東政法大學(xué);
【基金】：華東政法大學(xué)研究生創(chuàng)新能力培養(yǎng)專項(xiàng)資金資助項(xiàng)目(2016-4-010)《華北鄉(xiāng)村社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)、治理及法治化研究——以山東省日照市嵐山區(qū)Q村為調(diào)查對(duì)象》階段性成果之一
【分類號(hào)】：D90
，

本文編號(hào)：1493207