本文關(guān)鍵詞： 俄羅斯 精神損害賠償 著作權(quán) 法人 刑事附帶民事　出處：《黑龍江大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：現(xiàn)行俄羅斯立法中關(guān)于精神損害賠償?shù)囊?guī)定不僅立法技術(shù)高超,而且具有擴(kuò)展性,對(duì)受到侵犯的公民或法人提供較多的救濟(jì)手段,突出了對(duì)受害人所受精神損害的關(guān)注,體現(xiàn)了現(xiàn)代俄羅斯立法的嚴(yán)密性和周密性。本文首先對(duì)俄羅斯精神損害賠償?shù)膬?nèi)涵、功能和歷史沿革進(jìn)行了介紹分析;其次,分析了俄羅斯精神損害賠償?shù)臉?gòu)成要件及其適用范圍;再次,評(píng)析了俄羅斯精神損害賠償額計(jì)算的一般原則、確定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和確定方法等;最后,在對(duì)我國(guó)的精神損害賠償制度進(jìn)行評(píng)析后,本文建議我國(guó)應(yīng)借鑒俄羅斯精神損害賠償制度,確立著作權(quán)人、法人的精神損害賠償請(qǐng)求權(quán),確立刑事附帶民事精神損害賠償制度,以便更切實(shí)、廣泛地保護(hù)民事主體的合法權(quán)益。
[Abstract]:The provisions on compensation for moral damage in the current Russian legislation are not only highly skilled, but also extensible, and provide more relief means to the infringed citizens or legal persons. It highlights the attention to the mental damage suffered by the victims and reflects the strictness and thoroughness of modern Russian legislation. Firstly, this paper introduces and analyzes the connotation, function and historical evolution of the compensation for spiritual damage in Russia. Secondly, it analyzes the constituent elements and the scope of application of Russian spiritual damage compensation. Thirdly, it analyzes the general principles, criteria and methods of calculating the compensation for spiritual damage in Russia. Finally, after analyzing the system of compensation for mental damage in China, this paper suggests that China should learn from the Russian system of compensation for spiritual damage and establish the right of the copyright owner and legal person to claim for compensation for spiritual damage. In order to protect the legal rights and interests of civil subject more realistically and extensively, the system of compensation for civil mental damages attached to criminal law should be established.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：黑龍江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D951.2;DD913

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 王丹;;試論俄羅斯刑事附帶民事訴訟賠償制度[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

2 張用江;;也談精神損害賠償?shù)姆秶c關(guān)今華同志商榷[J];法學(xué)研究;1990年03期

3 馬俊駒,余延滿;試論法人人格權(quán)及其民法保護(hù)[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;1995年04期

4 申政武;;論人格權(quán)及人格損害的賠償[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué);1990年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1478029