本文關(guān)鍵詞： 著作權(quán) 姓名權(quán) 反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng) 假冒他人署名　出處：《湖南大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：假冒作者姓名，是一種出現(xiàn)頻率越來(lái)越高的侵權(quán)行為，但以現(xiàn)行《著作權(quán)法》又不能完全認(rèn)定其侵犯著作權(quán)并規(guī)制之。這種行為既損害作者的聲譽(yù)（人格），又損害作者的財(cái)產(chǎn)利益，實(shí)際上是利用了作者姓名所具有的商業(yè)聲譽(yù),是對(duì)作者姓名的商品化的權(quán)利或利益的侵害：既不是純粹的人格利益（姓名權(quán)），也不是單一的經(jīng)濟(jì)利益（不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)），而是兩者的結(jié)合——人格利益的商品化。 湖南王躍文訴河北王躍文侵犯著作權(quán)案就屬于這類行為的典型案例。河北一位原名王立山的人在將名字改為王躍文后，其作品小說(shuō)《國(guó)風(fēng)》得到了出版和發(fā)行，在該書(shū)的作者簡(jiǎn)介和宣傳資料中存在虛假內(nèi)容，導(dǎo)致消費(fèi)者產(chǎn)生與湖南知名作家王躍文的聯(lián)想，湖南王躍文遂起訴河北王躍文及出版社、發(fā)行公司侵犯其著作權(quán)。關(guān)于該案件，存在著兩個(gè)爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)，一是《國(guó)風(fēng)》是否是假冒他人署名的侵犯著作權(quán)的作品，二是發(fā)行《國(guó)風(fēng)》是否是不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為。通過(guò)具體分析著作權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任與一般侵權(quán)責(zé)任的區(qū)別，可以判斷，依據(jù)現(xiàn)行法律，該書(shū)并不是侵犯著作權(quán)的作品。假冒他人署名存在著不同的情況，針對(duì)不同的情況有不同的規(guī)制方法，主要包括姓名權(quán)、著作權(quán)中的署名權(quán)和反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)。關(guān)于這三種調(diào)整方法，司法實(shí)踐中存在著一定的分歧，目前還沒(méi)有定論。本案最后的判決結(jié)果認(rèn)定被告存在不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為，承擔(dān)賠償責(zé)任，這說(shuō)明盡管反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法既存在著聯(lián)系也有區(qū)別，但反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)起到了一種兜底性保護(hù)的作用。在未來(lái)，做好著作權(quán)法和反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法的修法工作，擴(kuò)大著作權(quán)向知名權(quán)的引申，防止著作權(quán)的濫用，，加強(qiáng)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)的救濟(jì)措施，尤其是完善姓名權(quán)、署名權(quán)和反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)假冒他人署名的調(diào)整方式并能夠綜合利用，都是更好的保護(hù)著作權(quán)可行的手段。
[Abstract]:Impersonating the author's name is a kind of infringing act which appears more and more frequently, but the current copyright Law can not completely confirm its infringing copyright and regulate it. This kind of behavior not only damages the author's reputation (personality). Damage to the property interests of the author, in fact, is the use of the commercial reputation of the author's name, is the commercialization of the name of the right or interests of the infringement: neither purely personal interests (name right). Nor is it a single economic interest (unfair competition, but the combination of the two-the commercialization of personality interests. " The case of Wang Yue-wen of Hunan Province v. Wang Yue-wen of Hebei Province is a typical case of such an act. A former name of Wang Li-shan in Hebei Province was changed to Wang Yue-wen after his name was changed to Wang Yue-wen. The novel "Guofeng" has been published and published, and there are false contents in the author's brief introduction and propaganda materials, which leads to the association of consumers with Wang Yue-wen, a famous writer in Hunan Province. Hunan Wang Yuewen sues Hebei Wang Yuewen and the publishing house, the distribution company infringes its copyright. There are two controversial points about the case, one is whether "Guofeng" is a copyright infringing work that impersonates another person's signature. The second is whether the issue of "Guofeng" is an act of unfair competition. Through the specific analysis of the difference between copyright tort liability and general tort liability, we can judge, according to the current law. The book is not an infringement of copyright works. There are different situations of impersonating others' signatures, and there are different regulation methods for different situations, including the right to name. The right of authorship and anti-unfair competition in copyright. There are some differences in judicial practice about these three adjustment methods. At present, there is no final conclusion. The final judgment of this case found that the defendant was guilty of unfair competition and assumed liability for compensation, which shows that although there are links and differences between anti-unfair competition law and intellectual property law. However, anti-unfair competition law has played a role in protecting intellectual property rights. In the future, we should do a good job in amending copyright law and anti-unfair competition law, and expand the extension of copyright to well-known rights. To prevent the abuse of copyright, to strengthen the relief measures of copyright infringement, especially to improve the right of name, the right of signature and anti-unfair competition to fake other people's signature adjustment and comprehensive utilization. It is a better way to protect copyright.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41;D920.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 錢(qián)玉林;禁止權(quán)利濫用的法理分析[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2002年01期

2 費(fèi)安玲;;論防止知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的制度理念[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2008年03期

3 趙燕敏;;簡(jiǎn)論著作權(quán)的合理使用與侵權(quán)行為認(rèn)定[J];赤峰學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(漢文哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年11期

本文編號(hào)：1464430