本文關(guān)鍵詞： 《問刑條例》 嘉靖 祖制 大禮議　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：嘉靖《問刑條例》是在弘治十三年《問刑條例》基礎(chǔ)上修訂、增補而成的明代中后期重要刑事立法，其修訂提議在嘉靖帝在位期間數(shù)次提出，但遲至嘉靖二十七年方奉旨編修，嘉靖二十九年正式頒行，對嘉靖《問刑條例》編修工作的討論議決過程與“大禮議”等政治斗爭在時間點上有一定的對應(yīng)關(guān)系，兩者的聯(lián)系也體現(xiàn)出明代祖制及皇權(quán)對立法進程的影響。 嘉靖帝即位之前的武宗朝亂政積弊甚多，官員貪風日盛，宗室、豪強侵占民地，階級矛盾激化，明朝統(tǒng)治面臨著極為嚴重的危機，嘉靖《問刑條例》適應(yīng)了社會形勢在弘治《問刑條例》頒布半個世紀以來的劇烈變化，在內(nèi)容上具有自身的顯著特點——完善了限制、打擊宗藩勢力的相關(guān)規(guī)定和贖刑、充軍的相關(guān)規(guī)定；嚴懲官吏、軍職貪瀆犯罪，限制官吏、軍職特權(quán)；嚴格維護封建禮教；維護國家經(jīng)濟秩序；打擊各地大戶豪強勢力；限制、打擊流民活動等。 與弘治《問刑條例》相比，嘉靖《問刑條例》新增條款較多，所涉及到的法律規(guī)范更趨豐富，且立法技術(shù)也較弘治《問刑條例》有了顯著提高。嘉靖《問刑條例》的頒行，維護和加強了明代中央集權(quán)政治，，緩和了階級矛盾，對明朝社會發(fā)展及法制演進起到了一定的積極作用，可以說，嘉靖《問刑條例》較好地反映和滿足了社會現(xiàn)實和司法實踐的需要。 此外，本文對喻茂堅上疏建議修訂《問刑條例》的時間，主持修訂嘉靖《問刑條例》的官員、以及嘉靖《問刑條例》的頒布時間、條數(shù)等問題做出了一定考證。
[Abstract]:Jiajing "interrogation punishment Ordinance" was amended on the basis of Hongzhi's Thirteen years "interrogation punishment Ordinance", which was added to the important criminal legislation in the middle and late Ming Dynasty, and its amendment proposal was put forward several times during the reign of Jiajing Di. But as late as 27 years of Jiajing edict, Jiajing 29 years officially promulgated. The discussion on the editorial and revision of Jiajing's "interrogation and punishment regulations" has a certain corresponding relationship with the political struggles such as "Great Rite discussion" and so on. The connection also reflects the influence of the ancestor system and imperial power on the legislative process in the Ming Dynasty. Before Emperor Jiajing ascended the throne, Wuzong Dynasty had many problems, such as corruption of officials, imperial clan, occupation of people's land, intensification of class contradictions, and the rule of Ming Dynasty was faced with a very serious crisis. Jiajing "interrogation punishment regulations" adapted to the social situation in the Hongzhi "interrogation punishment regulations" issued half a century of drastic changes, in terms of content has its own remarkable characteristics-perfect the restrictions. The relevant provisions of attacking the forces of suzerainty and the punishment of foreclosure, the relevant provisions of retribution; Severe punishment of officials, military corruption crimes, restrictions on officials, military privileges; Strict maintenance of feudal ethics; To maintain the national economic order; Crack down on the powerful and powerful forces of large households in various places; Restrict, crack down on the activities of displaced persons, etc. Compared with Hongzhi's "interrogation and punishment regulations", Jiajing "interrogation punishment regulations" has more new provisions, and the legal norms involved are more abundant. The enactment of Jiajing "interrogation punishment regulations" safeguarded and strengthened the centralization of power in the Ming Dynasty and alleviated the class contradictions. It has played a positive role in the social development and the evolution of the legal system in the Ming Dynasty. It can be said that Jiajing "interrogation punishment regulations" reflects and meets the needs of social reality and judicial practice. In addition, this paper suggests the time of revision of the interrogation regulations, the officials who presided over the revision of Jiajing, and the time of promulgation of Jiajing. The number and other problems made a certain textual research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D929;D924

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 鄭定;閔冬芳;;論清代對明朝條例的繼承與發(fā)展[J];法學(xué)家;2000年06期

2 霍存福;張靖翊;馮學(xué)偉;;以《大明令》為樞紐看中國古代律令制體系[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2011年05期

3 懷效鋒;嘉靖新政中的法制改良[J];社會科學(xué)輯刊;1990年01期

4 牛建強;;嘉靖年間世風之遷移[J];西北師大學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2008年02期

5 曲英杰;楊一凡;;明弘治《問刑條例》考析[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1989年05期

6 楊一凡;曲英杰;;《問刑條例》與明代中后期統(tǒng)治集團的立法思想[J];學(xué)習(xí)與探索;1991年05期

7 曲英杰;楊一凡;;明代《問刑條例》的修訂[J];中外法學(xué);1990年04期

本文編號：1456583