香檳方對腰椎融合術后胃腸功能影響的臨床研究
[Abstract]:Objective: to study the changes of abdominal distension pain, bowel sound, anal exhaust and defecation, nausea and vomiting in patients after lumbar vertebrae operation on the basis of animal experiment of Champagne Fang. To clarify the effect of Champagne recipe on the recovery of gastrointestinal function after lumbar vertebra operation, to give full play to the characteristics and advantages of traditional Chinese medicine in the perioperative period of lumbar vertebrae, and to lay a foundation for the study of rapid rehabilitation of patients after spinal surgery. Methods: sixty patients with single and double segmental lumbar fusion in Guangdong traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital were randomly divided into two groups: experimental group (n = 30) and control group (n = 30). Abdominal pain and abdominal distension were recorded one day before operation. On the first day after operation, the two groups were given drugs. On the basis of routine treatment, the experimental group was treated with Champagne prescription (areca nut 10g, ginseng 9g, black medicine 10g, Amomum villosum 6g, peach kernel 10g). The control group was given placebo until 7 days after operation. Take one dose a day at 9: 00 in the morning and 16:00 in the afternoon. At 6 hours (17: 00-1: 00), on the first day (1: 00-9: 00), on the first day (9: 00-17: 00), on the first day (17: 00-1: 00), on the second day (1: 00-9: 00), The second day (9: 00-17: 00), the second day (17: 00-1: 00), the third day, the fourth day, the fifth day, the sixth day and the seventh day after the operation were recorded. The first exsufflation of anus and the time of first defecation after operation were recorded. The changes of gastrointestinal tract such as abdominal distension, nausea and vomiting were recorded, and the data were established by using the perioperative gastrointestinal function evaluation scale. The data were processed by statistical SPSS13.0 data software. Results: 1. The average recovery time of postoperative bowel sounds was 17.99 h and 25.12 h, respectively, the difference was statistically significant (p0. 000 / p0.01); 2. The mean of the first time after operation was 16.87 h and 20.42 h, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (p0.049, p0.05). The mean of the first defecation time was 60.26 h and 75.7 h, respectively, the difference was statistically significant (p0. 002 / p0.01); 4. According to the evaluation scale of postoperative gastrointestinal function in perioperative period, the average scores of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group from the first day (9: 00: 17: 00) to the 7th day after operation, and the difference was statistically significant. That is, p0.01. In the experimental group, the average score of the experimental group in the first day (9: 00: 00), (17: 00 1: 00) and the second day after operation (1: 00-9: 00) was between 6079 and 6079. The average score of the control group was lower than that of the control group, and the average score of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P0.01). On the second day after operation (9: 00 17: 00), the average score of the experimental group was higher than 80 points, while the average score of the control group was still lower than 60 points. There was a significant difference between the two groups (P0.01). From the second day after operation (17: 00 1: 00) to the fourth day after operation, the average score of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group, and the control group was still lower than 60 points. The difference between the two groups was significant (P0.01). On the 5th day after operation, the average score of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group, the average score of the experimental group was more than 90 points, and the average score of the control group was between 600.79. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P0.01). On the 6th day after operation, the average score of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group, the average score of the experimental group was more than 90 points, and the average score of the control group was higher than 80 points, the difference was statistically significant (P0.01). There were no adverse events such as headache, dizziness, rash and so on. Conclusion: Champagne prescription can promote the recovery of bowel sound and the time of anal exhaust and defecation in patients with lumbar fusion. The overall clinical effect is good and worth popularizing.
【學位授予單位】:廣州中醫(yī)藥大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2016
【分類號】:R274.9
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 丁宇;腰椎融合術[J];中國矯形外科雜志;2001年10期
2 姜曉幸,陳統(tǒng)一,張光健;腹腔鏡下腰椎融合術[J];中華骨科雜志;2002年02期
3 郭炯炯,唐天駟;微創(chuàng)腰椎融合術[J];國外醫(yī)學.骨科學分冊;2003年06期
4 譚俊銘;葉曉健;賈連順;李家順;;腰椎融合術的研究進展[J];中國脊柱脊髓雜志;2006年05期
5 彭寶淦;;腰椎融合術治療椎間盤源性下腰痛[J];頸腰痛雜志;2006年06期
6 鄭召民;李佛保;;對微創(chuàng)腰椎融合術的認識與思考[J];中國脊柱脊髓雜志;2009年05期
7 劉彥斌;賀石生;李明;;微創(chuàng)腰椎融合術的研究進展[J];中國脊柱脊髓雜志;2009年05期
8 秦彥超;馬迅;;腰椎融合術及臨床研究進展[J];中國現代藥物應用;2010年01期
9 王璐璐;陳曉亮;;腰椎融合術的研究進展[J];齊魯醫(yī)學雜志;2011年06期
10 曾昭榮;;腰椎狹窄綜合癥機理的探討[J];貴陽醫(yī)學院學報;1982年01期
相關會議論文 前10條
1 呂宏琳;周躍;;微創(chuàng)腰椎融合術的研究與進展[A];第八屆全國脊柱脊髓損傷學術會議論文匯編[C];2007年
2 白劍強;夏群;徐寶山;張繼東;苗軍;楊強;;腰椎融合術后融合率的評價[A];第七屆全國創(chuàng)傷學術會議暨2009海峽兩岸創(chuàng)傷醫(yī)學論壇論文匯編[C];2009年
3 范順武;方向前;黃悅;趙鳳東;;下腰椎融合術的相關問題[A];2005年浙江省骨科學術會議論文匯編[C];2005年
4 邢丹;馬劍雄;王杰;徐桂軍;馬信龍;宋東輝;;后外側腰椎融合術應用成骨蛋白-1與同種自體骨的系統(tǒng)評價[A];第17次全國風濕病學學術會議論文集[C];2012年
5 邢丹;馬信龍;宋東輝;馬劍雄;王杰;徐桂軍;;后外側腰椎融合術中應用成骨蛋白-1與同種自體骨的系統(tǒng)評價[A];天津市生物醫(yī)學工程學會第三十二屆學術年會論文集[C];2012年
6 陳劍;范順武;;關節(jié)突關節(jié)螺釘在腰椎融合術中的應用進展[A];2004年浙江省骨科學術會議論文匯編[C];2004年
7 陸軍;宋東輝;曾憲帆;楊杰;張蔚然;邢丹;;后外側腰椎融合術應用成骨蛋白-1與同種自體骨的系統(tǒng)評價[A];第二十屆全國中西醫(yī)結合骨傷科學術研討會、第二屆中國醫(yī)師協(xié)會中西醫(yī)結合醫(yī)師分會骨傷科學術年會、第十九屆浙江省中西醫(yī)結合骨傷科專業(yè)委員會學術年會論文匯編[C];2013年
8 任忠明;張遠;吳宏飛;;雙側小切口椎旁肌間隙入路在下腰椎融合術中應用[A];浙江省醫(yī)學會骨科學分會30年慶典暨2011年浙江省骨科學學術年會論文匯編[C];2011年
9 任忠明;吳宏飛;張遠;張玉良;張銀華;;雙側小切口椎旁肌間隙入路在下腰椎融合術中應用[A];2012年浙江省骨科學術年會論文集[C];2012年
10 蔣國強;陸繼業(yè);盧斌;羅科鋒;岳兵;樂增年;王如林;韓成鋼;;Dynesys內固定術與腰椎融合術的臨床對照研究[A];浙江省醫(yī)學會骨科學分會30年慶典暨2011年浙江省骨科學學術年會論文匯編[C];2011年
相關重要報紙文章 前1條
1 通訊員 張獻懷;解放軍總醫(yī)院第一附屬醫(yī)院治療椎間盤腰痛初顯療效[N];大眾科技報;2007年
相關博士學位論文 前1條
1 王志鋼;羊腰椎后路全椎板減壓椎弓根釘內固定與否的力學性質研究[D];天津醫(yī)科大學;2010年
相關碩士學位論文 前10條
1 付青山;兩種椎間植骨融合方式治療腰椎滑脫的臨床療效的分析[D];安徽醫(yī)科大學;2016年
2 芮澤野;香檳方對腰椎融合術后胃腸功能影響的臨床研究[D];廣州中醫(yī)藥大學;2016年
3 郜獻雷;改良微創(chuàng)小切口經椎間孔入路腰椎融合術的臨床療效[D];山東大學;2016年
4 唐杰;LLIF與TLIF在臨床及影像學上的對比研究[D];重慶醫(yī)科大學;2016年
5 陶曉銳;仿蛙泳泳姿的鍛煉法在腰椎融合術后康復的運用[D];山東大學;2013年
6 林新源;管道下腰椎融合術治療伴退變失穩(wěn)的腰椎間盤突出癥[D];廣州中醫(yī)藥大學;2015年
7 趙椰楓;腰椎融合術后骶髂關節(jié)源性下腰痛的診斷和治療[D];第二軍醫(yī)大學;2008年
8 鄭慶豐;Mast Quadrant系統(tǒng)下微創(chuàng)腰椎融合術治療下腰椎退行性疾病的近期臨床研究[D];福建中醫(yī)藥大學;2010年
9 吳寒;后路單節(jié)段腰椎融合術中不同沖洗策略對患者圍手術期預后影響的評估[D];大連醫(yī)科大學;2015年
10 周珂;PEEK棒在腰椎融合術中的近期臨床研究[D];山東大學;2012年
,本文編號:2383094
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/zhongyixuelunwen/2383094.html