本文選題：糖尿病腎病　切入點：中醫(yī)證型　出處：《大連醫(yī)科大學》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的:對大連醫(yī)科大學附屬第二醫(yī)院住院的2型糖尿病患者及糖尿病腎病(diabetic nephropathy,DN)患者的病歷資料進行回顧性分析,研究2型糖尿病患者并發(fā)DN的危險因素,并探討糖尿病腎病中醫(yī)證型與相關指標之間的內在聯(lián)系,從而為糖尿病腎病的預防干預提供思路,為糖尿病腎病臨床辨證提供參考。方法:隨機選擇2014年3月到2015年10月在大連醫(yī)科大學附屬第二醫(yī)院內分泌科、腎內科、中醫(yī)科確診為2型糖尿病的患者共183例,其中伴有糖尿病腎病的有96例,分為DN組;不伴有糖尿病腎病的有87例,分為NDN(non diabetic nephropathy)組。將糖尿病腎病患者分為陰虛燥熱型、氣陰兩虛型、脾腎氣虛型、陰陽兩虛型4個中醫(yī)證型。對所有患者的性別、年齡、病程、體質指數、血脂(膽固醇、甘油三酯、高密度脂蛋白、低密度脂蛋白)、血壓(收縮壓、舒張壓、脈壓差)、血糖(空腹血糖、餐后2h血糖)、糖化血紅蛋白、空腹胰島素、胰島素敏感指數、胱抑素C、尿蛋白/肌酐比值進行統(tǒng)計。分析2型糖尿病并發(fā)DN的危險因素,探討糖尿病腎病各證型與上述各個指標間的相關性。觀察結果用SPSS13.0進行統(tǒng)計學分析,所有計量資料用均數±標準差(sx?)表示,符合正態(tài)分布的采用成組t檢驗,不符合正態(tài)分布的采用秩和檢驗,多組間比較采用方差分析;計數資料以百分率(%)表示,采用χ2卡方檢驗;用Logistic回歸分析分析相關危險因素。結果:1.DN組與NDN組在吸煙史、年齡、病程方面差異具有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05),DN組較NDN組吸煙患者更多,年齡更大,病程更長。兩組間在性別、飲酒史、糖尿病家族史、體質指數方面差異無統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。2.DN組與NDN組的收縮壓、脈壓差差異具有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05),DN組患者收縮壓和脈壓差水平高于NDN組;而兩組間舒張壓、血脂水平差異無統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。3.DN組空腹血糖、空腹胰島素、胱抑素C水平高于NDN組,DN組胰島素敏感指數低于NDN組,差異具有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05),兩組間餐后2h血糖、糖化血紅蛋白差異無統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。4.為明確DN發(fā)生的相關危險因素,將上述與DN發(fā)生具有顯著性差異的相關因素進行Logistic回歸分析,結果顯示:病程(OR=1.083,P=0.006)、胱抑素C(OR=2.427,P=0.037)、空腹血糖(OR=1.131,P=0.011)、空腹胰島素(OR=1.021,P=0.044)是糖尿病腎病的危險因素。5.DN各證型組間病程、胱抑素C、尿蛋白/肌酐并不完全相等(P0.05),兩兩比較結果得出,在病程方面,脾腎氣虛組和陰陽兩虛組均與陰虛燥熱組有統(tǒng)計學差異(P0.05),脾腎氣虛組和陰陽兩虛組患者病程均長于陰虛燥熱組患者;陰陽兩虛組在胱抑素C和尿蛋白/肌酐方面均較其他三個證型組高,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。DN各證型組間性別、年齡、BMI、血壓、血脂、吸煙史、飲酒史、糖尿病家族史、空腹血糖、餐后2h血糖、糖化血紅蛋白、胰島素敏感指數、胱抑素C、尿蛋白/肌酐比的差異均無統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。結論:1.年齡、病程、吸煙史、收縮壓、脈壓差、胱抑素C、空腹血糖、空腹胰島素、胰島素敏感指數與糖尿病腎病的發(fā)病有關,其中病程、空腹血糖、胱抑素C、空腹胰島素是糖尿病腎病的危險因素。病程越長、空腹血糖越高、空腹胰島素越高、胱抑素C越高,越容易并發(fā)糖尿病腎病。2.病程、胱抑素C、尿蛋白/肌酐與糖尿病腎病的中醫(yī)分型存在聯(lián)系:脾腎氣虛組和陰陽兩虛組患者病程均長于陰虛燥熱組患者;陰陽兩虛組胱抑素C、尿蛋白/肌酐比值均較其余三個證型組高,提示了陰陽兩虛型是糖尿病腎病的終末證型。
[Abstract]:Objective: to patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic nephropathy in Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University (diabetic nephropathy, DN) were analyzed retrospectively. The risk factors of DN in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and to explore the relationship between TCM Syndromes of diabetic nephropathy and related indicators, so as to provide ideas for the prevention and intervention of diabetes mellitus kidney disease, to provide reference for the clinical diagnosis of diabetic nephropathy. Methods: randomly selected from March 2014 to October 2015 in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Department of Endocrinology, Department of traditional Chinese medicine, Department of Nephrology, diagnosed with type 2 diabetes patients with a total of 183 cases with diabetic nephropathy in 96 cases, divided into the DN group; not associated with diabetic nephropathy in 87 cases, divided NDN (non diabetic nephropathy) group. The patients with diabetic nephropathy were divided into yin deficiency, Qi Yin deficiency, spleen qi deficiency, yin and yang two The 4 type of deficiency syndromes. All patients gender, age, duration, body mass index, blood lipids (cholesterol, triglycerides, high density lipoprotein, low density lipoprotein), blood pressure (systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure), blood glucose (fasting blood glucose, postprandial blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, 2H) fasting insulin, insulin sensitivity index, Cystatin C, urinary protein / creatinine ratio statistics. Analysis of type 2 diabetes risk factors associated with DN, to investigate the correlation between diabetic nephropathy syndrome type with the indexes. Results were statistically analyzed using SPSS13.0 standard deviation for all measurement data (SX?) said that accord with normal distribution using t test, does not meet the normal distribution using the rank sum test, analysis of variance was used to compare between groups; count data by percentage (%), with 2 chi square test; analysis of the related risk factors with Logistic regression analysis. Results: 1.DN group and NDN group in the history of smoking, age, course of disease was statistically significant difference (P0.05), DN group compared with NDN group, smoking patients had more older, longer duration. Between the two groups in gender, drinking history, family history of diabetes, there was no significant difference on body mass index (P0.05) of.2.DN group with the NDN group of systolic blood pressure, pulse pressure difference was statistically significant (P0.05), DN group of patients with systolic pressure and pulse pressure levels higher than the NDN group; and two groups of diastolic pressure, no significant difference of serum lipid levels (P0.05) in group.3.DN, fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin, serum cystatin C levels higher than the NDN group, DN group the insulin sensitivity index was lower than the NDN group, the difference was statistically significant between the two groups (P0.05), 2h postprandial blood glucose, no statistically significant difference in glycated hemoglobin (P0.05) specific.4. related risk factors of DN, DN and the related factors with significant difference Logistic regression analysis results showed that duration (OR=1.083, P=0.006), Cystatin C (OR=2.427, P=0.037), fasting blood glucose (OR=1.131, P=0.011), fasting insulin (OR=1.021, P=0.044).5.DN is a risk factor for diabetic nephropathy syndromes group course of cystatin C, urinary protein / creatinine (P0.05 is not completely equal 22), the results showed that in the course of disease, both spleen and kidney qi deficiency group and Yin and yang deficiency group had significant difference with the two yinxuzaore group (P0.05), spleen and kidney qi deficiency group and Yin and Yang of the two virtual group patients were longer than those of yin asthenia and heat group patients; two of yin and yang deficiency group in cystatin C and urine protein / creatinine compared with other three groups, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05.DN) the syndrome group between gender, age, BMI, blood pressure, blood fat, smoking history, drinking history, family history of diabetes, fasting blood glucose, 2h postprandial blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, insulin sensitive index, inhibition of cystine C, urine protein / creatinine ratio differences were not statistically significant (P0.05). Conclusion: 1. age, disease duration, smoking history, systolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, Cystatin C, fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin, insulin sensitivity index, the incidence of diabetic nephropathy with the course of disease, fasting blood glucose, fasting serum cystatin C insulin is a risk factor for diabetic nephropathy. The longer the duration, the higher the fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin is higher, Cystatin C is higher, more prone to diabetic nephropathy in the course of.2., Cystatin C, urinary protein / creatinine and diabetic nephropathy in TCM are linked: spleen kidney qi deficiency group and Yin and yang deficiency patients were two course longer than yinxuzaore group patients; two of yin and yang deficiency group of cystatin C, urinary protein / creatinine ratio was better than the other three groups, suggesting that the two type is the end of yin and yang deficiency syndrome of diabetic nephropathy.

【學位授予單位】：大連醫(yī)科大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：R259

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 王玉新,李大啟,李公寶,徐琴君;糖尿病腎病患者血清可溶性白細胞介素6受體檢測[J];上海免疫學雜志;2001年02期

2 宮雅南,劉冬年,熊玉冰,黃偉文,莊萬江;糖尿病足患者糖尿病視網膜病變分析[J];廣東醫(yī)學;2001年06期

3 顧芹,宋守君,李向陽,尤傳一;胰激肽原酶腸溶片對早期糖尿病腎病的防治作用[J];中國臨床藥學雜志;2001年06期

4 曹愛華 ,王瑛 ,李翔;杏丁治療早期糖尿病腎病療效觀察[J];遼寧實用糖尿病雜志;2001年03期

5 ;中藥治療糖尿病腎病新進展[J];中國中醫(yī)藥信息雜志;2001年04期

6 張桂茹;糖尿病腎病85例臨床分析[J];陜西醫(yī)學雜志;2002年02期

7 侯建明 ,林鳳輝 ,張超群;46例2型糖尿病腎病與糖尿病自主神經病變的關系分析[J];福建醫(yī)藥雜志;2002年04期

8 陳文霖;糖尿病飲食[J];醫(yī)療保健器具;2002年Z1期

9 孫力,許玲;2型糖尿病患者糖尿病足的危險因素分析[J];山東醫(yī)藥;2002年35期

10 ;糖尿病腎病診治研究進展[J];基礎醫(yī)學與臨床;2003年04期

相關會議論文 前10條

1 張星;許筠;蘇建平;張軍;程立志;翟曉麗;;糖尿病腎病的臨床療效對比觀察[A];第十九次全國中醫(yī)腎病學術交流會論文匯編[C];2006年

2 楊家茂;;糖尿病腎病防治瑣談[A];全國第二屆中醫(yī)中西醫(yī)結合腎臟病臨床進展學術研討會論文集[C];2007年

3 丁耀耿;郝桂霞;;糖尿病腎病臨床分析[A];全國第二屆中醫(yī)中西醫(yī)結合腎臟病臨床進展學術研討會論文集[C];2007年

4 張文鎧;王志伏;王雪;孫大朋;;糖尿病腎病的治療現(xiàn)狀[A];中華中醫(yī)藥學會第二十一屆全國中醫(yī)腎病學術會議論文匯編（下）[C];2008年

5 倪青;;糖尿病腎病的中西醫(yī)結合研究[A];第六屆全國中西醫(yī)結合腎臟病學術會議論文匯編[C];2000年

6 孫怡;李健紅;宗紅燕;;黃芪桂枝五物湯加味治療糖尿病腎病16例[A];第六屆全國中西醫(yī)結合腎臟病學術會議論文匯編[C];2000年

7 葉軍;;糖尿病腎病在兒童時期的早期干預[A];中華醫(yī)學會第六次全國內分泌學術會議論文匯編[C];2001年

8 杜旭昶;孫志紅;閆春芳;劉彩虹;;疏糖丹治療2型糖尿病50例臨床分析[A];第六次中國中西醫(yī)結合糖尿病學術會議論文匯編[C];2002年

9 于世家;任平;馬麗佳;李小娟;鄭曙琴;武明東;劉自力;薛麗輝;;糖尿病住院患者1344例回顧性分析[A];第六次中國中西醫(yī)結合糖尿病學術會議論文匯編[C];2002年

10 郝效槐;魏玫都;崔立俊;;中西并蓄治療糖尿病腎病[A];第七次中國中西醫(yī)結合糖尿病學術會議論文匯編[C];2004年

相關重要報紙文章 前10條

1 本報記者 向佳;糖尿病中醫(yī)藥防治項目立足社區(qū)[N];中國中醫(yī)藥報;2011年

2 特約記者 魯海燕;逾八成公眾存在糖尿病高危因素[N];家庭醫(yī)生報;2013年

3 馬明愈;現(xiàn)代生活方式導致 糖尿病發(fā)病率迅速上升[N];中國婦女報;2005年

4 省立醫(yī)院內分泌科主任醫(yī)師 侯建明;糖尿病腎病的防治[N];福建科技報;2004年

5 王文絹 范軍星;世界糖尿病日關注焦點:糖尿病并發(fā)癥[N];健康報;2003年

6 主持人 向紅丁博士;糖尿病腎病須早防早治[N];人民政協(xié)報;2002年

7 華悅;預防糖尿病，，從減肥開始[N];上海中醫(yī)藥報;2004年

8 劉冬梅;肥胖糖尿病第一誘因[N];天津日報;2004年

9 劉燕玲;首部中醫(yī)專病指南定下糖尿病治則[N];健康報;2007年

10 崔昕;中藥防治糖尿病腎病有進展[N];健康時報;2006年

相關博士學位論文 前10條

1 王曉杰;組蛋白去乙�；�4特異性促進糖尿病腎病足細胞損傷[D];山東大學;2015年

2 張永;MiR-346在抗TGF-β信號途徑介導的糖尿病腎病發(fā)生和發(fā)展中的作用機制[D];武漢大學;2015年

3 魏鳳江;高尿酸血癥、2型糖尿病及糖尿病微血管病變的群體遺傳學研究[D];天津醫(yī)科大學;2015年

4 孫士杰;胱抑素C對2型糖尿病視網膜病變預測價值研究[D];山東大學;2015年

5 魏艷紅;PKCα介導的EGFR降解在糖尿病腎病足細胞損傷中的作用及機制[D];華中科技大學;2015年

6 龍泓竹;益氣養(yǎng)陰通絡散結方防治早期糖尿病腎病的臨床及實驗研究[D];北京中醫(yī)藥大學;2016年

7 姜e

本文編號：1684355