發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-03 01:22

  本文選題：糖尿病視網(wǎng)膜病變　切入點(diǎn)：中藥　出處：《藥物流行病學(xué)雜志》2017年03期 　論文類(lèi)型：期刊論文

【摘要】：目的:對(duì)中藥治療糖尿病視網(wǎng)膜病變的中藥組方、中成藥信息及文中報(bào)道的安全性指標(biāo)進(jìn)行概述及評(píng)價(jià)。方法:系統(tǒng)檢索Cochrane Library、Pub Med、CNKI、Sino Med、VIP和萬(wàn)方數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù),從建庫(kù)至2015年12月。納入中藥與常規(guī)治療或西藥或安慰劑比較的隨機(jī)對(duì)照試驗(yàn)。兩名作者獨(dú)立進(jìn)行文獻(xiàn)篩選、資料提取和納入研究質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià),質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)采用Cochrane協(xié)作網(wǎng)的偏倚風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估工具。應(yīng)用RevMan 5.3進(jìn)行數(shù)據(jù)分析。結(jié)果:共納入56項(xiàng)研究,4104名受試者。中藥治療方法包括37種中藥湯劑,15種中成藥。3個(gè)試驗(yàn)評(píng)價(jià)為低偏倚風(fēng)險(xiǎn),其余為高偏倚風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。14項(xiàng)試驗(yàn)報(bào)告了安全性指標(biāo),5項(xiàng)試驗(yàn)發(fā)生了不良事件。結(jié)論:雖然本研究結(jié)果顯示中藥治療組與對(duì)照組相比患者不良事件發(fā)生情況無(wú)差異,但是現(xiàn)有的臨床試驗(yàn)對(duì)藥物安全性重視程度不夠,建議今后的研究能夠完善對(duì)安全性指標(biāo)的監(jiān)測(cè)及報(bào)告,增加研究的臨床參考價(jià)值。
[Abstract]:Objective: to summarize and evaluate the traditional Chinese medicine prescription for diabetic retinopathy, the information of Chinese patent medicine and the safety index reported in this paper. From the establishment of the library to December 2015. The randomized controlled trials in which traditional Chinese medicine was compared with conventional therapy or western medicine or placebo. The two authors independently conducted literature screening, data extraction and evaluation of the quality of the study. The quality evaluation was carried out with the bias risk assessment tool of Cochrane cooperation network. The data were analyzed with RevMan 5.3. Results: a total of 4104 subjects were included in 56 studies. The therapeutic methods of traditional Chinese medicine included 37 kinds of traditional Chinese medicine decoction and 15 kinds of Chinese patent medicine. Three experiments were conducted. Evaluated as low bias risk, The other 14 trials reported adverse events in 5 trials. Conclusion: although the results of this study showed that there was no difference in the occurrence of adverse events between the Chinese medicine treatment group and the control group, there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the Chinese medicine treatment group and the control group. However, the current clinical trials do not pay enough attention to the safety of drugs. It is suggested that future studies can improve the monitoring and reporting of safety indicators and increase the clinical reference value of the research.
【作者單位】： 北京中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)循證醫(yī)學(xué)中心;
【基金】：2013年教育部新世紀(jì)優(yōu)秀人才支持計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目(編號(hào):NCET-13-0694) 2013年北京市科技新星計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目(編號(hào):Z131107000413031)
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：R259;R276.7

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 卜一珊;徐彥貴;崔桅;張麗艷;顧一凡;孫景生;;天津市部分醫(yī)療機(jī)構(gòu)輸液相關(guān)不良事件發(fā)生情況及相關(guān)因素分析研究[J];中國(guó)藥學(xué)雜志;2012年02期

2 趙立群,劉姿瑤,趙麗君;中西醫(yī)結(jié)合治療急性冠狀動(dòng)脈綜合征臨床觀(guān)察[J];中國(guó)中醫(yī)急癥;2004年03期

3 崔寒英;;個(gè)體化目標(biāo)血糖調(diào)控在腦梗死合并糖尿病治療中心臟事件發(fā)生情況觀(guān)察[J];山西醫(yī)藥雜志;2013年04期

4 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 沈龔尚;八灘工商所嚴(yán)查糧販反被封門(mén)[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2000年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 王芳;中醫(yī)院心肌梗死出院患者終點(diǎn)事件發(fā)生情況的隨訪(fǎng)研究[D];山東中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2015年

2 魏曉芬;不同劑量阿托伐他汀對(duì)冠心病患者血糖的影響[D];山西醫(yī)科大學(xué);2014年

3 趙晨;中醫(yī)院238例心肌梗死患者終點(diǎn)事件發(fā)生情況的隊(duì)列研究[D];山東中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：1558953