毫針結(jié)合電針治療中風(fēng)后抑郁的臨床療效觀察
本文關(guān)鍵詞:毫針結(jié)合電針治療中風(fēng)后抑郁的臨床療效觀察 出處:《新疆醫(yī)科大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文
更多相關(guān)文章: 中風(fēng)后抑郁 毫針 電針
【摘要】:目的:觀察毫針結(jié)合電針治療中風(fēng)后抑郁的臨床療效,為今后臨床治療中風(fēng)后抑郁提供更多的選擇。方法:將滿足研究條件的60例中風(fēng)后抑郁的患者隨機(jī)分為針刺1組、針刺2組及藥物組,每組各20例。針刺1組、針刺2組選用不同的穴位予以普通針刺結(jié)合電針治療。每日治療1次,連續(xù)治療7日為一個療程,間隔療程之間休息1天,連續(xù)觀察兩個療程。藥物組給予鹽酸氟西汀口服治療,每日20mg,每日1次,晨服,連續(xù)服用2周,觀察三組患者治療前后漢密爾頓抑郁評分、中醫(yī)癥候評分?jǐn)?shù)值變化。結(jié)果:抑郁方面:三組患者治療前后漢密爾頓抑郁評分組內(nèi)比較均有統(tǒng)計學(xué)差異(均P0.05);組間比較:治療后三組患者進(jìn)行兩兩比較,均無統(tǒng)計學(xué)差異(均P0.05)。中醫(yī)癥候改善方面:三組患者的中醫(yī)癥候評分進(jìn)行治療前后的組內(nèi)比較,均有統(tǒng)計學(xué)差異治療(均P0.05);組間比較:針刺1組與針刺2組比較差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P0.05);針刺1組與藥物組比較差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P0.05);針刺2組與藥物組無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P0.05)結(jié)論:針刺1組、針刺2組及藥物組對于中風(fēng)后抑郁患者抑郁癥狀的改善療效相當(dāng);針刺1組改善中醫(yī)癥候方面療效優(yōu)于針刺2組、藥物組;針刺2組與藥物組療效相當(dāng)。
[Abstract]:Objective: To observe the clinical curative effect of electroacupuncture combined with acupuncture treatment of depression after stroke and provide more options for future clinical treatment of depression after stroke. Methods: 60 cases meet the conditions on the depression after stroke were randomly divided into acupuncture group 1, acupuncture 2 group and drug group, 20 cases in each group. The acupuncture group 1, acupuncture 2 groups of different points selected to be ordinary acupuncture combined with electroacupuncture. Daily for 1 times, for 7 consecutive days as a course of treatment interval of 1 days of rest, continuous observation of two courses. Drugs were given oral fluoxetine hydrochloride treatment, daily 20mg, 1 times per day, morning, for 2 weeks, the Hamilton depression score in three groups before and after treatment were observed, TCM syndrome score value changes. Results: depression: three groups of patients before and after treatment of Hamilton depression score group were statistically significant (P0.05); group comparison: after treatment three groups of patients By 22, there was no significant difference (P0.05). TCM symptom improvement: the TCM symptoms of the three groups of patients were compared before and after treatment group, there were statistically significant differences between the treatment (P0.05); comparison between groups was statistically significant in 1 groups: Acupuncture and acupuncture on the difference between the 2 groups (P0.05); a significant differences between the 1 acupuncture group and drug group (P0.05); 2 acupuncture group and drug group had no statistical significance (P0.05) conclusions: 1 acupuncture group, acupuncture group and drug group for a 2 improvement in depressive symptoms in patients with depression after stroke; acupuncture 1 group to improve the TCM syndrome better than the acupuncture group 2, drug group; acupuncture group 2 and efficacy of the drug group.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:新疆醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:R246.6
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 程俊萍;張桂波;張倩;焦志華;朱潤佳;王曄靜;林海;洪文順;查姣杰;;針刺不同組穴治療中風(fēng)后抑郁臨床研究[J];上海針灸雜志;2016年12期
2 于學(xué)平;楊才佳;張潔玉;;針刺膻中穴治療中風(fēng)后抑郁臨床療效觀察[J];針灸臨床雜志;2016年08期
3 王峰;婁曉敏;夏羅敏;錢晨;蔣新平;;針刺結(jié)合穴位注射治療缺血性中風(fēng)后抑郁癥臨床觀察[J];上海針灸雜志;2016年08期
4 李桂玉;閔寶權(quán);王文忠;李佳艷;;211例老年卒中后抑郁患病率調(diào)查及危險因素分析[J];感染、炎癥、修復(fù);2016年02期
5 費(fèi)鵬鴿;李麗平;宋景貴;;氟西汀治療腦卒中后抑郁療效的Meta分析[J];中國實用神經(jīng)疾病雜志;2016年11期
6 魏春杰;吳成吉;盛寶英;楊曉玉;姜堯佳;劉松巖;;腦卒中后抑郁與C反應(yīng)蛋白和白細(xì)胞介素-6的表達(dá)情況[J];中國實驗診斷學(xué);2016年04期
7 楊晶;王非;肖文華;李云芳;;耳穴電針結(jié)合中藥治療中風(fēng)后抑郁癥臨床觀察[J];湖北中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)學(xué)報;2016年01期
8 李偉偉;于盼盼;王鳴池;;通督調(diào)神針法聯(lián)合中藥治療中風(fēng)后抑郁的療效觀察[J];陜西中醫(yī);2015年12期
9 劉新峰;;缺血性卒中血管內(nèi)治療的新篇章[J];醫(yī)學(xué)研究生學(xué)報;2015年11期
10 王延武;王爛,
本文編號:1416985
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/zhongyixuelunwen/1416985.html