【摘要】：主詞和謂詞在邏輯上是構(gòu)成判斷的最基本要素,而在本體論和認識論上對它們?nèi)绾味ㄎ?則成為產(chǎn)生不同哲學派別的邏輯端緒。西方哲學的每一次重大變革無不肇始于對主謂關(guān)系的重新理解,就此而言,一部西方哲學史仿佛就是主詞與謂詞的辯證歷程。馬克思的哲學變革也不例外,他正是通過批判黑格爾和青年黑格爾派的主謂顛倒,并建立起自己的主謂辯證法,才為他的哲學和整個思想打下邏輯基礎(chǔ)的。可是,自從馬克思不再談?wù)撨@個話題以來,170年間,他的這一思想幾乎湮沒無聞。后世的馬克思主義都以恩格斯和列寧的辯證邏輯作為邏輯基礎(chǔ)。不過,他們二人都未曾論述過主謂關(guān)系這種原本的邏輯問題。因此,將馬克思的主謂辯證法發(fā)掘出來,對于重新理解馬克思本人的哲學和馬克思主義哲學都具有極其重要的意義。
[Abstract]:Subject and predicate are logically the most basic elements of judgment, and how they are positioned in ontology and epistemology becomes the logical thread of different philosophical schools. Marx's philosophical change was no exception. It was by criticizing Hegel and the young Hegelians that he established his own dialectics of subject and predicate that he laid the logical foundation for his philosophy and the whole thought. However, since Marx stopped talking about this topic, his thought has been around for 170 years. Neither of them has ever discussed the original logical problem of the subject-predicate relationship. Therefore, to dig out Marx's subject-predicate dialectics is to re-understand Marx's own philosophy and Marxist philosophy. It is of great significance.
【作者單位】： 中山大學馬克思主義哲學與中國現(xiàn)代化研究所、哲學系暨實踐哲學研究中心;
【基金】：2013年度國家社科基金重點項目“馬克思主義實踐哲學的語言轉(zhuǎn)向研究”(編號13AZX003) 2013年廣東省高層次人才項目“馬(克思主義)、中(國傳統(tǒng))、西(方)實踐哲學的比較研究”的階段性成果
【分類號】：B0-0
，

本文編號：2214606